- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT02487771
Kansas University DHA Outcome Study (KUDOS) Follow-Up
29. Januar 2018 aktualisiert von: Susan Carlson, PhD
This is a continuation study to KUDOS (NCT00266825).
The purpose of this study is to follow-up with participants on the original study to determine if the effects of increasing DHA intake during pregnancy increase cognitive development in 2 to 6 year-old children.
Studienübersicht
Status
Abgeschlossen
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Numerous trials show benefits of postnatal DHA supplementation for visual acuity.
There are also numerous observational(not intervention)studies that link higher maternal DHA status during pregnancy to higher cognitive function.
Intervention studies that increase DHA exposure during fetal life and that measure cognitive development of infants are lacking; and no study to date has systematically followed children whose mothers were randomly assigned to DHA supplementation to school age with regular 6 month assessments of age-appropriate assessments of cognitive development.
The absence of such studies is a serious limitation because there is evidence that differences in cognitive function due to such interventions do not become robust until around age 4 years.
Women in the US consume low amounts of DHA compared to other world populations, and this likely means less DHA transfer to the fetus than in many other populations.
Prenatal DHA exposure may be more important than postnatal exposure, because animal studies show critical windows for brain DHA accumulation in relation to effects on neurotransmitters such as serotonin, dopamine and GABA.
Studientyp
Interventionell
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
190
Phase
- Phase 3
Kontakte und Standorte
Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.
Studienorte
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, Vereinigte Staaten, 66160
- University of Kansas Medical Center
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
16 Jahre bis 35 Jahre (Kind, Erwachsene)
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Nein
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Weiblich
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant females 16.0-35.0 years of age (inclusive) at 8-20 weeks gestation at enrollment (date/ultrasound)
- Agree to consume study capsules from enrollment until delivery
- Agree to return to the study center for delivery
- BMI < 40
- No serious illnesses (e.g., cancer, diabetes, lupus, hepatitis, sexually transmitted diseases, not HIV positive)
- Available by telephone
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than 16 or greater than 35 years of age
- BMI < 40
- Serious illness such as cancer, lupus, hepatitis, sexually transmitted disease or HIV positive
- Expecting multiple infants
- Diabetes or gestational diabetes at baseline
- Elevated blood pressure due to any cause
- Not planning to return to the study center for delivery
- Gestational age at baseline < 8 weeks or >20 weeks
- Unable or unwilling to agree to consume capsules until delivery
- Unable to provide informed consent in English
Studienplan
Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Behandlung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Doppelt
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Placebo-Komparator: Placebo-Kapsel
|
600 mg of Soybean Oil and Corn Oil, which does not contain any DHA
|
|
Experimental: DHA Capsule
|
600 mg DHA capsule
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Full Scale IQ
Zeitfenster: 36 Months
|
The Full Scale IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's general intellectual ability based upon assessments of verbal, cognitive, and performance domains.
At three years the Full Scale IQ score has a range of 41 (poorest performance) to 155 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 40 to 160.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
36 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Full Scale IQ
Zeitfenster: 48 Months
|
The Full Scale IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's general intellectual ability based upon assessments of verbal, cognitive, and performance domains.
At three years the Full Scale IQ score has a range of 41 (poorest performance) to 155 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 40 to 160.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
48 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Full Scale IQ
Zeitfenster: 72 Months
|
The Full Scale IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's general intellectual ability based upon assessments of verbal, cognitive, and performance domains.
At three years the Full Scale IQ score has a range of 41 (poorest performance) to 155 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 40 to 160.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
72 Months
|
|
Cognitive Function Score - Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
Zeitfenster: 60 Months
|
The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, 3rd Edition provides a standardized assessment of a person's receptive vocabulary.
The Standard Score can range from 40 (poorest performance) to 160 (best performance) and has been normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
60 Months
|
|
Cognitive Function Score - Test of Preschool Early Literacy
Zeitfenster: 42 Months
|
The Test of Preschool Early Literacy provides a standardized Early Literacy Index score, a measure of general, early literacy skills that relate to later reading and writing skill acquisition.
The score is based on assessments of vocabulary, print knowledge, and phonological awareness.
The score can range from 40 (poorest performance) to 144 (best performance) and has been normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
42 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Verbal IQ
Zeitfenster: 36 Months
|
The Verbal IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's verbal ability based upon assessments of vocabulary, general knowledge, and reasoning.
At three years the Verbal IQ score has a range of 49 (poorest performance) to 150 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 46 to 155.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
36 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Verbal IQ
Zeitfenster: 48 Months
|
The Verbal IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's verbal ability based upon assessments of vocabulary, general knowledge, and reasoning.
At three years the Verbal IQ score has a range of 49 (poorest performance) to 150 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 46 to 155.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
48 Months
|
|
Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition; Verbal IQ
Zeitfenster: 72 Months
|
The Verbal IQ score from the Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 3rd Edition is a standardized measure of a child's verbal ability based upon assessments of vocabulary, general knowledge, and reasoning.
At three years the Verbal IQ score has a range of 49 (poorest performance) to 150 (best performance).
For the older ages the score can range from 46 to 155.
For all ages the assessment is normed to a Mean = 100, St Dev = 15.
|
72 Months
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Zeitfenster: 36 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
36 Months
|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Zeitfenster: 48 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
48 Months
|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Zeitfenster: 60 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
60 Months
|
|
Adaptive Regulation Assessment
Zeitfenster: 72 Months
|
The Parent Rating Scales of the Behavior Assessment System for Children 2nd Edition measures different aspects of a child's behaviors as reported by a parent.
Externalizing Problems is a measure of Aggression and Hyperactivity.
Internalizing Problems is a measure of Anxiety, Depression, and Somatization.
The Behavioral Symptoms Index is a more global measure of behavior problems and combines Externalizing Problems with the measure of Depression from Internalizing Problems, and additional measures of Atypicality, Withdrawal, and Attention Problems.
Adaptive Skills is a measure of Adaptability, Social Skills, Activities of Daily Living, Functional Communication, and at age 6 years Leadership.
All scores are derived from the general, combined sex normative tables of T-Scores.
For Adaptive Skills higher T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
For all other measures lower T-Scores reflect a more optimal outcome.
All T-Scores were standardized with a Mean = 50, St Dev = 10.
|
72 Months
|
Andere Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 3 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Weight-for-age
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually child weight was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 kg on an electronic scale (Cardinal Detecto 8430, Webb City, MS, USA).
|
6 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 3 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Height-for-Age
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually child stature was measured one time standing without shoes and in the lightest layer of clothing to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall mounted statiometer (Health O Meter® Professional, McCook IL, USA).
Braids, ponytails or other hair artifacts were removed or subtracted when needed.
|
6 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 3 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Body Mass Index-for-age
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually child body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the standard equation: BMI = kg/m^2.
|
6 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
2 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 2.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 3 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
3 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 3.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
4 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Anthropometrics: Head Circumference-for-age
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually child head circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard technique (tape positioned just above the eyebrows, above the ears and around the biggest part of the back of the head; tape pulled snuggly to compress hair and underlying soft tissue).
Braids, ponytails, glasses or other artifacts were removed whenever possible.
|
6 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 2 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
2 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 2.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
2.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 3 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
3 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 3.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
3.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
4 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Dietary Intake
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually a registered dietitian assessed child diet by a standardized 24 hour dietary recall with three-pass approach.
When necessary both the parent and child participated in the recall process to increase overall reliability.
Recalls were entered into Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R versions 2006-2016, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and were checked for accuracy by a second dietitian.
Reliability and caloric intake data are presented here.
Reliability is defined as the dietitian's subjective assessment of the family's ability to recall the majority of food items consumed during the 24 hour period and within reasonable serving sizes.
Caloric intake is the mean kcal per day from reliable recalls only.
|
6 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
6 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually child blood pressure was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
6 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: 4 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: 4.5 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
4.5 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: 5 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: 5.5 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
5.5 years
|
|
Heart Rate
Zeitfenster: 6 years
|
Biannually child heart rate was measured in triplicate using an automatic pressure cuff (GE Carescape V100, Chicago, IL, USA) while children were seated in a resting state.
Raw averages are reported here, including outliers.
Not all subjects participated in triplicate measures.
|
6 years
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.
Sponsor
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Susan E Carlson, PhD, University of Kansas Medical Center
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Colombo J, Shaddy DJ, Gustafson K, Gajewski BJ, Thodosoff JM, Kerling E, Carlson SE. The Kansas University DHA Outcomes Study (KUDOS) clinical trial: long-term behavioral follow-up of the effects of prenatal DHA supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 May 1;109(5):1380-1392. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz018.
- Kerling EH, Hilton JM, Thodosoff JM, Wick J, Colombo J, Carlson SE. Effect of Prenatal Docosahexaenoic Acid Supplementation on Blood Pressure in Children With Overweight Condition or Obesity: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Feb 1;2(2):e190088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0088.
Nützliche Links
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
1. Juli 2008
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
1. Mai 2016
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
1. Mai 2016
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
18. Juni 2012
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
30. Juni 2015
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
1. Juli 2015
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
7. Februar 2018
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
29. Januar 2018
Zuletzt verifiziert
1. Januar 2018
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- 11406
- 1R01HD047315 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Ja
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Nein
Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird
Nein
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .
Klinische Studien zur Placebo Capsule
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnbekanntAkute Bronchitis | Akute Infektion der oberen AtemwegeKorea, Republik von
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)AbgeschlossenCannabiskonsumVereinigte Staaten
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyAbgeschlossenMännliche Probanden mit Typ-II-Diabetes (T2DM)Deutschland
-
CellmedisMedical Network Sp. z o.o.Noch keine Rekrutierung
-
Texas A&M UniversityNutraboltAbgeschlossenGlukose- und Insulinreaktion
-
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario...Creaciones Aromáticas Industriales, S.A. (CARINSA)Abgeschlossen
-
Soroka University Medical CenterAbgeschlossen
-
Regado Biosciences, Inc.AbgeschlossenGesunder FreiwilligerVereinigte Staaten
-
LifeMine TherapeuticsRekrutierung