Sikkerhet, tolerabilitet, farmakokinetikk, farmakodynamikk og effekt av SAR442501 hos pediatriske deltakere med akondroplasi (upreACH-2)
1. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Sanofi
En fase 2, åpen, multisenter, 2-trinns sekvensiell kohort, doseeskaleringsstudie for å vurdere sikkerhet, tolerabilitet, farmakokinetikk, farmakodynamikk og effektivitet av subkutan SAR442501 hos pediatriske deltakere med akondroplasi
Dette er en fase 2, åpen, multisenter, studie for å evaluere sikkerhet, tolerabilitet og effekt av SAR442501 hos barn fra fødsel til 12 år med Achondroplasia.
Studieoversikt
Detaljert beskrivelse
Inntil ca. 275 uker: 3 uker Screening + 52 uker primærbehandlingstid + inntil ca. 216 uker utvidet behandlingsperiode + 4 ukers oppfølging.
Studietype
Intervensjonell
Registrering (Faktiske)
16
Fase
- Fase 2
Kontakter og plasseringer
Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.
Studiesteder
-
-
Victoria
-
Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052
- Investigational Site Number : 0360001
-
-
-
-
Lombardy
-
Milan, Lombardy, Italia, 20122
- Investigational Site Number : 3800002
-
-
Roma
-
Rome, Roma, Italia, 00168
- Investigational Site Number : 3800001
-
-
-
-
-
Shanghai, Kina, 200120
- Investigational Site Number : 1560002
-
Wuhan, Kina, 430030
- Investigational Site Number : 1560001
-
-
-
-
Basque Country
-
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spania, 01008
- Investigational Site Number : 7240002
-
-
Catalunya [Cataluña]
-
Esplugues de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña], Spania, 08950
- Investigational Site Number : 7240001
-
-
-
-
Seoul-teukbyeolsi
-
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, Sør -Korea, 03080
- Investigational Site Number : 4100001
-
Seoul, Seoul-teukbyeolsi, Sør -Korea, 06351
- Investigational Site Number : 4100002
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Barn
Tar imot friske frivillige
Nei
Beskrivelse
Inklusjonskriterier:
- Deltakerne må ha ACH med en bekreftet mutasjon i FGFR3-genet
- Deltakere og/eller foreldre eller juridiske representanter må være villige og i stand til å utføre alle studieprosedyrene etter beste evne.
- Foreldre eller juridiske representanter som er i stand til å gi signert informert samtykke og deltakere som er i stand til å gi samtykke når det er aktuelt.
Ekskluderingskriterier:
- Har hypokondroplasi (eller N540K-mutasjonen) eller annen kortvokst tilstand enn ACH (f.eks. trisomi 21, pseudochondroplasi)
- Deltakerne har mottatt en hvilken som helst dose med medisiner eller undersøkelsesprodukt, inkludert humant veksthormon, beregnet på å påvirke deltakernes statur eller kroppsproporsjoner innen 6 måneder etter påmelding (uke 0/dag 1/besøk 2).
- Har en historie med lukking av vekstplate.
- Langt benbrudd innen 3 måneder etter registrering (uke 0/dag 1/besøk 2)
- Aktuelle bevis på hornhinne- eller retinal lidelse/keratopati.
- Deltakerne har hatt en tidligere kirurgisk intervensjon som involverte foramen magnum (kun stadium 2).
- Hyperfosfatemi.
Informasjonen ovenfor er ikke ment å inneholde alle hensyn som er relevante for en potensiell deltakelse i en klinisk studie.
Studieplan
Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Sekvensiell tildeling
- Masking: Ingen (Open Label)
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentell: Kohort 1
|
Injeksjonsvæske, oppløsning; Subkutan injeksjon
|
|
Eksperimentell: Kohort 2
|
Injeksjonsvæske, oppløsning; Subkutan injeksjon
|
|
Eksperimentell: Kohort 3
|
Injeksjonsvæske, oppløsning; Subkutan injeksjon
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Tidsramme: From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug.
An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to study drug or not) that at any dose: resulted in death; or was life-threatening; or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; or resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was an important medical event.
An AESI was an AE (serious or nonserious) of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the Investigator to the Sponsor was required.
The TEAEs were defined as events that were newly reported or reported to worsen in severity after the start of study drug up to 5 days post last dose of the study drug.
|
From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Growth Velocity Z-Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
Post-treatment annualized growth velocity (AGV) was calculated from height measurements collected during the study.
AGV was calculated as: AGV (centimeter per year)= (Height at Date 2 - Height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25,
where interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1+1).
Z scores were calculated using LMS methods (Box Cox power L, Median M and Variation S), where appropriate: If L≠ 0: Z= [(AGV/M)^L-1]/(LxS); If L= 0: Z= ln(AGV/M)/S.
A Z score of 0 represents the mean AGV of the reference achondroplasia (ACH) population.
For AGV Z scores in children with ACH: Higher Z scores represent better outcomes, meaning faster linear growth relative to age and sex matched reference populations.
Lower Z scores represent worse outcomes, indicating slower growth compared to reference norms.
Baseline value was defined as last available pre dose height measurement meeting statistical analysis plan specified time interval definitions.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Annualized Growth Velocity
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The AGV was defined as follows: (Height at Date 2 - height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25,
where the interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1 +1) days.
The post-treatment AGV was calculated from height measurements collected during the study.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Height Z-Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
Post-treatment AGV was calculated from height measurements collected during the study.
AGV was calculated as: AGV (centimeter per year)= (Height at Date 2 - Height at Date 1) divided by interval length in days x 365.25,
where interval length in days was calculated as (Date 2 - Date 1+1).
Z scores were calculated using LMS methods (Box Cox power L, Median M and Variation S), where appropriate: If L≠ 0: Z= [(AGV/M)^L-1]/(LxS); If L= 0: Z= ln(AGV/M)/S.
A Z score of 0 represents the mean AGV of the reference population (ACH).
For AGV Z scores in children with ACH: Higher Z scores represent better outcomes, meaning faster linear growth relative to age and sex matched reference populations.
Lower Z scores represent worse outcomes, indicating slower growth compared to reference norms.
Baseline value was defined as last available pre dose height measurement meeting statistical analysis plan specified time interval definitions.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Body Segment Ratio
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The upper to lower body segment ratio was calculated by (standing height or total length - lower body segment length) divided by lower body segment length.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper to Lower Extremity Ratio
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The upper to lower extremity ratio was calculated by (upper arm + forearm length) divided by (upper leg + lower leg length).
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Sitting to Standing Height Ratio
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The sitting to standing height ratio was calculated by sitting height divided by standing height, or crown to rump length divided by total length.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Arm Span to Height Ratio
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The arm span to height ratio was calculated by arm span divided by standing height, or arm span divided by total length.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Arm to Forearm Length Ratio
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The upper arm to forearm length ratio was calculated by upper arm length divided by forearm length.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Upper Leg to Lower Leg Ratio
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The upper leg to lower leg length ratio was calculated by upper leg length divided by lower leg length.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Head Circumference to Height Ratio
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The head circumference to height ratio was calculated by head circumference divided by standing height, or head circumference divided by total length.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 2: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Brainstem, Skull, and Spine Morphometric and Volumetric Parameters
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
|
The magnetic resonance imaging was planned to be collected to measure foramen magnum and other brainstem, skull, and spine morphometric parameters in Stage 2 participants.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Social Score, Emotional Score, and School Functioning Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The pediatric quality of life (PedsQL) Generic Core Scales assesses pediatric health related quality of life (HRQOL) across functioning domains.
Items use a 5-point scale (0=Never to 4=Almost Always).
Responses are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0→100, 1→75, 2→50, 3→25, 4→0), where higher scores indicate better quality of life (fewer problems).
Domain scores for Social, Emotional, and School Functioning are calculated from the transformed item scores.
If more than 50% of items in a domain are missing, the domain score is not computed.
If at least 50% are completed, the domain score equals the mean of the non missing transformed item scores.
All domain scores range from 0 (almost always) to 100 (never), with higher scores indicate better HRQOL.
Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Psychosocial Health Summary Score, Physical Health Summary Score, and Total Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The PedsQL core scale was a brief, standardized, generic instrument that was used to measure HRQOL in various pediatric conditions.
Psychosocial health summary scores were the meaning of item scores in emotional, social, and school functioning scales; and Physical health summary scores were the meaning of item scores in physical scale.
Total score was the mean of all the item scores in all scales.
Psychosocial and physical health summary scores and total scores each ranged from 0 (almost always) to 100 (never).
Higher scores indicate better HRQOL.
For participants aged 5 to 7, only parents completed the questionnaire.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Mobility Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The screening tool for everyday mobility and symptoms (STEMS) was completed by clinicians for participants 5 years of age and older.
The STEMS captures mobility, use of mobility aides, and impact of pain and/or fatigue at the end of the day across 3 environments: home, school/work and community.
Mobility aides were recorded using numeric 5-point rating scale, score ranged from 1 to 5, where 1= independent on all surfaces including stairs, 2= use of sticks, 3= use of crutches, 4= use of wheeled walking device, and 5= use of wheelchair or mobility scooter.
Lower score indicated the better outcome.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Participants Reported Symptoms
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The STEMS was completed by clinicians for participants 5 years of age and older.
The STEMS captures mobility, use of mobility aides, and impact of pain and/or fatigue at the end of the day across 3 environments: home, school/work and community.
Participant reported symptoms were recorded using letters where A= no pain or fatigue, B1= pain only, B2= fatigue and C= pain and fatigue.
This was completed for each of the 3 environments resulting in 3 scores, whereby the numeric rating reflects the use of mobility aides and the letter reflects the symptoms.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Only participants with a Baseline response of "A" were included in the "A to A," "A to B1," and "A to missing" categories at each time point.
Similarly, only participants with a Baseline response of "B1" were included in the "B1 to A" and "B1 to missing" categories at each time point.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in General Fatigue, Sleep/Rest Fatigue and Cognitive Fatigue Scores and Total Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale measures fatigue across 3 subscales:General Fatigue, Sleep/Rest Fatigue and Cognitive Fatigue.
Items are rated on a 5 point scale (0=Never to 4=Almost Always).
Responses are reverse scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale (0→100, 1→75, 2→50, 3→25, 4→0), with higher scores indicate less fatigue and better functioning.
Subscale scores are calculated as mean of transformed item scores within each subscale.
A Total Score was calculated as mean of all transformed items across subscales.
If more than 50% of items are missing within a subscale or across total scale, corresponding score is not computed.
If at least 50% are completed, scores are calculated as mean of non missing transformed items.
All scores range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain), with higher scores indicate less fatigue.
Baseline was defined as last available value prior to first dose of study drug.
For participants aged 5-7 years, only parent proxy report was completed.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Current Pain and Worst Pain Rating (PPQ) Score
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
The PedsQL PPQ assesses current pain and worst pain intensity in the last week using a visual analog scale as well as pain location using a body map.
Current and worst pain were scored separately, and scoring was based on the line length to the nearest 0.5 centimeter (5 millimeter).
The score ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain), where higher scores indicated greater levels of pain intensity.
The PedsQL PPQ was only administered in participants ages 5 years of age and older using both self-report (ages 8 and older) and parent proxy report (ages 5 and older) forms in all countries.
For participants aged 5 to 7, only parents completed the questionnaire.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 2: Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Achievement of Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Communication, and Feeding Milestones
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
|
For Stage 2 participants, achievement of developmental milestones was planned to be assessed using the ACH developmental recording form.
This form allows developmental milestones to be recorded and was not a formalized screening tool or assessment.
The form measures the domains of gross motor function, fine motor function, communication and feeding via participant reports to the Investigator.
The form depicts the cumulative percentage distributions for children with ACH for each item as well as norms for reference based on the Denver II test, where available.
Data collected via this form was planned to be evaluated descriptively to explore the age at which participants in this study achieve developmental milestones.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 52
|
|
Stage 1: Plasma Concentration of SAR442501
Tidsramme: Pre-dose and 6, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
Blood samples are collected to determine plasma concentration of SAR442501.
|
Pre-dose and 6, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
|
Stage 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of SAR442501
Tidsramme: Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
Blood samples are collected to determine Cmax of SAR442501.
The Cmax of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.
|
Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
|
Stage 1: Time to Reach the Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of SAR442501
Tidsramme: Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
Blood samples are collected to determine tmax of SAR442501.
The tmax of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.
|
Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
|
Stage 1: Area Under the Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours After Study Drug Administration (AUC0-tau) of SAR442501
Tidsramme: Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
Blood samples are collected to determine AUC0-tau of SAR442501.
The AUC0-tau of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.
|
Pre-dose and 3, 6, 12, 24 and 72 hours post dose on Day 57
|
|
Stage 1: Minimum Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of SAR442501
Tidsramme: Pre-dose on Days 8, 29, 57, 92, 183, 274, 365 and 449
|
Blood samples are collected to determine Ctrough of SAR442501.
The Ctrough of SAR442501 was calculated using non-compartmental method.
|
Pre-dose on Days 8, 29, 57, 92, 183, 274, 365 and 449
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Collagen X Biomarker (CXM) Level
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 26
|
Serum samples were collected to assess the change in CXM level with study drug.
The CXM was also named PRO-C10 because the biomarker assay used was aimed to target the recognition of the C terminus of the NC1 domain of type X collagen.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
Change from baseline in CXM level has been reported.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Week 26
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Osteocalcin Level
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
Serum samples were collected to assess the change in osteocalcin level with study drug.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase Level
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
Serum samples were collected to assess the change in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase level with study drug.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Procollagen Type 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) Level
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
Serum samples were collected to assess the change in P1NP level with study drug.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Collagen-Type 1 C-Telopeptide (CTX) Level
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
Serum samples were collected to assess the change in CTX level with study drug.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
|
Stage 1: Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to SAR442501
Tidsramme: From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)
|
Serum samples were collected to assess the antibodies to SAR442501.
Samples were screened and then confirmed for antibodies binding to SAR442501 and the titer of confirmed positive samples were reported.
Positive ADA refers to pre-existing ADA at the pre-dose assessment on Day 1.
|
From the first dose of study drug administration (Day 1) up to early termination of the study, approximately 58 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose A) and 46 weeks (Stage 1: SAR442501 Dose B)
|
|
Stage 2: Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to Weeks 26 and 52 in Neurological Examination Findings
Tidsramme: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
A complete neurological examination included assessment of mental status, motor function and balance, sensory exam, newborn and infant reflexes, muscle stretch reflexes in the older children and evaluation of the cranial nerves.
The baseline value was defined as the last available value before the first dose of study drug.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 26 and 52
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.
Sponsor
Etterforskere
- Studieleder: Clinical Sciences & Operations, Sanofi
Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker
Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.
Hjelpsomme linker
Studierekorddatoer
Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
10. oktober 2023
Primær fullføring (Faktiske)
12. februar 2025
Studiet fullført (Faktiske)
12. februar 2025
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
20. september 2023
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
28. september 2023
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
4. oktober 2023
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
25. juni 2026
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
1. juni 2026
Sist bekreftet
1. mai 2026
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- DRI16646
- U1111-1280-5374 (Registeridentifikator: ICTRP)
- 2023-503677-37 (Registeridentifikator: CTIS)
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
JA
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Kvalifiserte forskere kan be om tilgang til data på pasientnivå og relaterte studiedokumenter, inkludert den kliniske studierapporten, studieprotokollen med eventuelle endringer, blankt case-rapportskjema, statistisk analyseplan og datasettspesifikasjoner.
Data på pasientnivå vil anonymiseres og studiedokumenter vil bli redigert for å beskytte personvernet til forsøksdeltakerne.
Ytterligere detaljer om Sanofis kriterier for datadeling, kvalifiserte studier og prosess for å be om tilgang finner du på: https://vivli.org
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Ja
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Nei
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .