Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Comparison of Cosmetic Outcome and Patient Satisfaction Between Staples and Suture Technique for Wound Closure Following Upper Limb Surgeries

3. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Rohit Shrestha, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences

A Comparative Study of Wound Outcome and Patient Satisfaction Between Incisions Closed With Staples and Sutures Following Elective Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgeries

Surgical wound closure is an essential component of postoperative care that influences wound healing, infection rates, cosmetic appearance, and patient satisfaction. Sutures are conventionally used for skin closure following orthopedic procedures; however, surgical staples have gained popularity because of their rapid application, secure fixation, and potentially superior cosmetic outcomes. Despite their widespread use, there remains limited evidence comparing cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction between staple and suture techniques in upper limb surgeries in the local setting.

This study aims to compare the cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between staples and sutures for wound closure following upper limb surgeries at Dhulikhel Hospital. Secondary objectives include comparing wound infection rates and duration of hospital stay between the two techniques.

A prospective comparative study is conducted among adult patients undergoing upper limb surgeries. Patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria are recruited consecutively during the study period. Following completion of surgery, wound closure is performed either with interrupted sutures or surgical staples according to the operative plan. Wounds are to be evaluated on postoperative day 2, day 7, and day 14, with further follow-up at 30 days and 6 weeks.

Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction are assessed using a 5-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Pain assessment, wound complications including infection, and duration of hospital stay are also documented and compared between the two groups. The findings of this study can help identify the optimal skin closure method for upper limb surgeries and contribute to improved postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction.

HYPOTHESES OF THE STUDY Null hypothesis (Ho): there is no difference in cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between sutures and staple technique for wound closure following upper limb surgeries.

Alternative hypothesis (H1): there is difference in cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction between sutures and staple technique for wound closure following upper limb surgeries

Hence, Ho : (Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Suture group = Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Staples group H1 : (Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Suture group ≠ (Cosmetic and Patient satisfaction score) in Staples group

Studieoversikt

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

80

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

    • Bagmati
      • Dhulikhel, Bagmati, Nepal, 45200
        • Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (> 18 years and above)
  • Any wound more than two centimeters in length
  • All closed fracture of upper limb requiring open reduction and internal fixations
  • All implant removal and benign tumor excision of upper limb

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Open upper limb fracture
  • Known metal allergy(nickel, titanium)
  • Active infection
  • Malignant tumor excision
  • Tendon repair
  • Closed Reduction Percutaneous Pinning

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Skin Closure with Suture Group
Following completion of the upper limb surgical procedure, skin closure is performed using interrupted non-absorbable skin sutures under aseptic precautions. Skin closure is mattress as it allows for inversion or eversion of the repaired tissue, greater repair strength, and provides a greater area of soft tissue apposition to bone.
Eksperimentell: Skin Closure with Staple Group
Following completion of the upper limb surgical procedure, skin closure is performed using sterile surgical skin staples under aseptic precautions.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by 5-Point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Tidsramme: 1 year
Cosmetic outcome following wound closure with staples or sutures will be assessed at 30 days and 6 weeks using a 5-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates excellent cosmetic appearance and 5 indicates very poor cosmetic appearance. Lower scores indicate better cosmetic outcome.
1 year
Patient Satisfaction Assessed by 5-Point Satisfaction Scale
Tidsramme: 1 year
Patient satisfaction regarding wound closure will be assessed at 30 days and 6 weeks using a 5-point satisfaction scale. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates extremely satisfied and 5 indicates extremely dissatisfied. Lower scores indicate greater patient satisfaction.
1 year

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Postoperative Pain Assessed by 5-Point Pain Scale
Tidsramme: 1 year
Postoperative pain at the wound site will be assessed during follow-up visits using a 5-point pain scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates no pain and 5 indicates very severe pain. Lower scores indicate less postoperative pain.
1 year
Surgical Site Infection
Tidsramme: 1 year
Surgical site infection will be assessed clinically during postoperative follow-up visits on day 2, day 7, day 14, and day 30. Infection will be reported as presence or absence of clinical signs including redness, swelling, discharge, or wound tenderness.
1 year
Length of Hospital Stay
Tidsramme: 1 year
Length of hospital stay will be measured in days from the date of surgery until discharge from hospital. Shorter hospital stay indicates improved postoperative recovery.
1 year

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. november 2022

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

30. mai 2024

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

30. mai 2024

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

24. mai 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

3. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

8. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

8. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

3. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. mai 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere