Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Acute Pain Management in Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures

14. september 2026 oppdatert av: Mohamed Elsayed Ali Ibraheim, Assiut University

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block for Acute Pain Management in Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study

Traumatic rib fractures cause severe chest wall pain that can impair normal breathing, coughing, and lung function. While systemic opioids are commonly used to treat traumatic pain, their side effects, such as sedation and respiratory depression, can complicate recovery. Regional nerve blocks like the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) offer targeted pain relief while minimizing opioid requirements.

The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the analgesic efficacy and respiratory outcomes of adding dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone to bupivacaine during an ultrasound-guided ESPB in emergency department patients with acute traumatic rib fractures.

Participants aged 18 to 65 years presenting within 24 hours of rib injury will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

  • Dexmedetomidine Group: Receives an ultrasound-guided ESPB with bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine.
  • Dexamethasone Group: Receives an ultrasound-guided ESPB with bupivacaine plus dexamethasone.

The primary outcome is the duration of analgesia, measured as the time to the first request for rescue pain medication. Secondary outcomes include pain scores at rest and during coughing/deep breathing, total 24-hour opioid consumption, diaphragmatic motion evaluated by ultrasound, respiratory recovery, and the incidence of adverse events over a 24-hour follow-up period.

Studieoversikt

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Antatt)

100

Fase

  • Fase 2
  • Fase 3

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years
  • Both sexes
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II
  • Acute traumatic rib fractures confirmed by appropriate imaging
  • Flail-chest patients who are hemodynamically and respiratory stable to undergo erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and reliable assessment
  • Spontaneously breathing patients or patients receiving supplemental oxygen/non-invasive respiratory support without an immediate indication for intubation
  • Ability to report pain using a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
  • Presentation within 24 hours of trauma
  • Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to participate
  • Immediate need for endotracheal intubation or invasive mechanical ventilation prior to randomization or block placement
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring immediate resuscitation or vasopressor support precluding safe regional anesthesia
  • Cardiorespiratory arrest or peri-arrest status
  • Severe associated traumatic brain injury or other injuries preventing reliable clinical evaluation
  • Major associated injury requiring immediate emergency operative or interventional procedures that prevent protocol completion
  • Coagulopathy or any contraindication to regional anesthesia
  • Local infection at the anticipated block needle insertion site
  • Known allergy to amide local anesthetics, dexmedetomidine, or dexamethasone
  • Significant bradyarrhythmia, high-grade atrioventricular block, or contraindication to dexmedetomidine
  • Chronic opioid consumption or chronic pain syndromes requiring regular analgesic therapy
  • Prior regional anesthesia performed for the current trauma
  • Inability to cooperate with the procedure or pain evaluation

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Firemannsrom

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Dexmedetomidine Group
Participants receive an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) following local skin infiltration with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine.
Ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) administered deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process (typically T4-T6) using bupivacaine supplemented with dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) following local skin infiltration with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine.
Aktiv komparator: Dexamethasone Group
Participants receive an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with bupivacaine plus dexamethasone (4 mg) following local skin infiltration with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine.
Ultrasound-guided thoracic erector spinae plane block (ESPB) administered deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process (typically T4-T6) using bupivacaine supplemented with dexamethasone (4 mg) following local skin infiltration with 5 mL of 2% lidocaine.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Time to First Rescue Analgesic Request
Tidsramme: Up to 24 hours post-block
Time (in minutes) from the completion of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block until the patient's first request for rescue analgesia (or when the Numeric Rating Scale score is 4 or greater).
Up to 24 hours post-block

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Antatt)

1. oktober 2026

Primær fullføring (Antatt)

1. oktober 2027

Studiet fullført (Antatt)

1. november 2027

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

14. september 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

14. september 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

18. september 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

18. september 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

14. september 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. september 2026

Mer informasjon

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere