Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Comparison of Two Quantitative EMG Monitors for Deep Neuromuscular Block in Laparoscopic/Robotic and VATS Surgery

9 lipca 2026 zaktualizowane przez: Boris Mraovic, Ohio State University

Comparison of Two Quantitative Electromyography Monitors for Deep Neuro Muscular Block in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Laparoscopic/Robotic or Thoracic Video-Assisted (VATS) Surgeries

The main objective of the study is to compare the frequency of intraoperative spontaneous diaphragmatic movements and breath-initiation efforts in participants undergoing robotic and/or thoracic surgery under deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB), using either the TetraGraph or TwitchView applied to the dominant hand. These events will serve as objective indicators to evaluate each device's ability to monitor and maintain adequate deep NMB.

Przegląd badań

Status

Rekrutacyjny

Warunki

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

This study is a prospective intraoperative device comparison trial evaluating neuromuscular blockade monitoring using two quantitative EMG-based devices, the TetraGraph (Senzime) and TwitchView (Blink), during elective laparoscopic, robotic, or video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) abdominal surgeries requiring neuromuscular blockade. Participants will be assigned to receive both monitoring devices simultaneously, placed on opposite upper extremities, allowing each subject to serve as their own control. Standard anesthesia care will be maintained throughout the procedure, including volatile anesthetic titration, opioid administration as needed, mechanical ventilation targeting normocapnia, temperature regulation, and routine neuromuscular blockade management with rocuronium and reversal with sugammadex per institutional practice. Neuromuscular function will be continuously assessed using train-of-four (TOF), train-of-four ratio, and post-tetanic count (PTC) measurements, with data recorded at predefined intraoperative time points including baseline, post-paralytic administration, maintenance, reversal, and prior to extubation. Additional data will include dosing of neuromuscular blocking agents, physiologic parameters, and intraoperative clinical observations relevant to depth of blockade and recovery. Provider usability and workflow integration will be evaluated postoperatively through brief standardized surveys assessing device usability, signal quality, and overall satisfaction. All collected data will be derived from device outputs and routine perioperative clinical documentation without altering standard patient care.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Szacowany)

35

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Kontakt w sprawie studiów

Kopia zapasowa kontaktu do badania

Lokalizacje studiów

  • Stany Zjednoczone
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, Stany Zjednoczone, 43201
        • Rekrutacyjny
        • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
        • Kontakt:

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Tak

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years old.
  • Patients undergo elective abdominal laparoscopic/robotic or thoracic video-assisted (VAT) surgeries requiring general anesthesia for greater than 3 hours at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
  • Able to provide a signed, written informed consent.
  • Able to speak, read, and write in English.
  • ASA physical status I-III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who require emergency surgery or an emergent intervention.
  • Any documented cognitive or psychological disorders that, in the investigator's opinion, can interfere with the patient's pain perception.
  • Vulnerable populations: pregnant females, prisoners, breastfeeding.
  • Presence of any medical condition that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, should exclude the patient from the study (patients with pre-existing neuromuscular diseases.
  • Allergy or contraindications to any of the anesthetics, NMB agents, or sugammadex.
  • Patients with anatomical abnormalities of the hands or arms that prevent proper placement of the sensors for nerve stimulation.
  • Limited access to the monitoring area due to surgical positioning.
  • Patients with peripheral vascular disease, since it may affect measurement accuracy.

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Diagnostyczny
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Podwójnie

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: TetraGraph (Senzime) Dominant Hand
Participants will have the TetraGraph (Senzime) electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the dominant hand and the TwitchView (Blink) EMG neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the non-dominant hand. The device placed on the dominant hand will be used to guide intraoperative neuromuscular blockade management, while measurements from both devices will be collected for comparison of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring performance.
Urządzenie: TetraGraph (Senzime)-Guided Neuromuscular Monitoring (Dominant Hand)
The TetraGraph (Senzime) quantitative electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device will be applied to the participant's dominant hand after induction of general anesthesia and prior to neuromuscular blocking agent administration. Surface electrodes will be placed over the ulnar nerve per manufacturer instructions, and the device will be calibrated to obtain baseline Train-of-Four (TOF) measurements. Following rocuronium administration, the device will continuously monitor neuromuscular function, recording TOF approximately every 15 seconds and post-tetanic count (PTC) every 5 minutes when TOF count is zero. As the dominant-hand monitor, its readings will guide rocuronium redosing to maintain deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 0-3) and assess recovery. During emergence, it will guide reversal, with extubation at TOF ratio ≥0.9.
Eksperymentalny: TwitchView (Blink) Dominant Hand
Participants will have the TwitchView (Blink) electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the dominant hand and the TetraGraph (Senzime) EMG neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the non-dominant hand. The device placed on the dominant hand will be used to guide intraoperative neuromuscular blockade management, while measurements from both devices will be collected for comparison of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring performance.
Urządzenie: TwitchView (Blink)-Guided Neuromuscular Monitoring (Dominant Hand)
The TwitchView (Blink) quantitative electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device will be applied to the participant's dominant hand after induction of general anesthesia and prior to administration of neuromuscular blocking agents. Surface electrodes will be placed over the ulnar nerve per manufacturer instructions, and the device will be calibrated to obtain baseline Train-of-Four (TOF) measurements. Following rocuronium administration, neuromuscular function will be continuously monitored, with TOF recorded approximately every 15 seconds and post-tetanic count (PTC) every 5 minutes when TOF count is zero. As the dominant-hand device, its measurements will guide rocuronium redosing to maintain deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 0-3) and assess recovery. During emergence, it will guide reversal, with extubation at TOF ratio ≥0.9.

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Incidence of intraoperative diaphragmatic movement during deep neuromuscular blockade
Ramy czasowe: During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.
The number of spontaneous diaphragmatic movement events observed during maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade will be recorded and compared between participants monitored with the TetraGraph (Senzime) and TwitchView (Blink) electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring devices.
During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.
Incidence of spontaneous breath-initiation efforts during deep neuromuscular blockade
Ramy czasowe: During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.
The number of spontaneous breath-initiation efforts observed during maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade will be recorded and compared between participants monitored with the TetraGraph (Senzime) and TwitchView (Blink) EMG neuromuscular monitoring devices.
During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score
Ramy czasowe: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Intubation difficulty will be assessed using the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS), a composite score ranging from 0 upward, where 0 represents easy intubation and higher scores indicate greater intubation difficulty.
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Incidence of patient movement or bucking during intubation
Ramy czasowe: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Percentage of participants with patient movement or bucking during tracheal intubation, assessed as a clinical indicator of inadequate neuromuscular blockade.
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Cormack-Lehane grade of vocal cord visibility during intubation
Ramy czasowe: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Vocal cord visibility will be assessed during tracheal intubation using the Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic grading system (Grades I-IV), where Grade I indicates the best glottic view and Grade IV indicates the poorest view.
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Vocal cord movement during intubation
Ramy czasowe: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Vocal cord movement will be assessed during tracheal intubation using the predefined study classification (e.g., open, moving, closing, or closed) as an indicator of intubating conditions.
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
Post-tetanic count (PTC)
Ramy czasowe: Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
Post-tetanic count (PTC), reported as the number of muscle responses (count), will be measured using the TetraGraph and TwitchView neuromuscular monitoring devices and compared for agreement and correlation.
Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
Train-of-four (TOF) count
Ramy czasowe: Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
Train-of-four (TOF) count, reported as the number of twitch responses (0-4), will be measured using the TetraGraph and TwitchView devices and compared for agreement and correlation.
Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
Time to recovery of train-of-four ratio >0.9
Ramy czasowe: During emergence from anesthesia, from administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent until extubation.
Time, in minutes, from administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent to achievement of a train-of-four (TOF) ratio >0.9, as measured by the TetraGraph and TwitchView devices.
During emergence from anesthesia, from administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent until extubation.
Train-of-four ratio before extubation
Ramy czasowe: Immediately before extubation following completion of surgery and recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
Train-of-four (TOF) ratio, reported as a decimal value from 0 to 1.0 (or percentage), measured immediately before extubation using the TetraGraph and TwitchView devices. Higher values indicate greater recovery of neuromuscular function.
Immediately before extubation following completion of surgery and recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Ramy czasowe: Immediately after completion of the intraoperative procedure and device use.
Anesthesia care providers will evaluate device usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS), which ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability.
Immediately after completion of the intraoperative procedure and device use.
Leiden Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS) score
Ramy czasowe: At completion of the surgical procedure, prior to emergence from general anesthesia.
Surgeon-rated surgical conditions will be assessed using the Leiden Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS), a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates extremely poor surgical conditions and 5 indicates optimal surgical conditions. Higher scores indicate better surgical conditions.
At completion of the surgical procedure, prior to emergence from general anesthesia.

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Sponsor

Ohio State University

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Publikacje ogólne

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

9 lutego 2026

Zakończenie podstawowe (Szacowany)

9 lutego 2028

Ukończenie studiów (Szacowany)

9 sierpnia 2028

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

14 maja 2026

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

9 lipca 2026

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

15 lipca 2026

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

15 lipca 2026

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

9 lipca 2026

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 maja 2026

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • STUDY20252768

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

NIEZDECYDOWANY

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Tak

produkt wyprodukowany i wyeksportowany z USA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj