- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07706504
Comparison of Two Quantitative EMG Monitors for Deep Neuromuscular Block in Laparoscopic/Robotic and VATS Surgery
9 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Boris Mraovic, Ohio State University
Comparison of Two Quantitative Electromyography Monitors for Deep Neuro Muscular Block in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Laparoscopic/Robotic or Thoracic Video-Assisted (VATS) Surgeries
The main objective of the study is to compare the frequency of intraoperative spontaneous diaphragmatic movements and breath-initiation efforts in participants undergoing robotic and/or thoracic surgery under deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB), using either the TetraGraph or TwitchView applied to the dominant hand.
These events will serve as objective indicators to evaluate each device's ability to monitor and maintain adequate deep NMB.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Reclutamiento
Condiciones
Descripción detallada
This study is a prospective intraoperative device comparison trial evaluating neuromuscular blockade monitoring using two quantitative EMG-based devices, the TetraGraph (Senzime) and TwitchView (Blink), during elective laparoscopic, robotic, or video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) abdominal surgeries requiring neuromuscular blockade.
Participants will be assigned to receive both monitoring devices simultaneously, placed on opposite upper extremities, allowing each subject to serve as their own control.
Standard anesthesia care will be maintained throughout the procedure, including volatile anesthetic titration, opioid administration as needed, mechanical ventilation targeting normocapnia, temperature regulation, and routine neuromuscular blockade management with rocuronium and reversal with sugammadex per institutional practice.
Neuromuscular function will be continuously assessed using train-of-four (TOF), train-of-four ratio, and post-tetanic count (PTC) measurements, with data recorded at predefined intraoperative time points including baseline, post-paralytic administration, maintenance, reversal, and prior to extubation.
Additional data will include dosing of neuromuscular blocking agents, physiologic parameters, and intraoperative clinical observations relevant to depth of blockade and recovery.
Provider usability and workflow integration will be evaluated postoperatively through brief standardized surveys assessing device usability, signal quality, and overall satisfaction.
All collected data will be derived from device outputs and routine perioperative clinical documentation without altering standard patient care.
Tipo de estudio
Intervencionista
Inscripción (Estimado)
35
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Alberto Uribe, MD
- Número de teléfono: 6142933559
- Correo electrónico: alberto.uribe@osumc.edu
Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio
- Nombre: Elvia Vera, MD
- Número de teléfono: 6142933559
- Correo electrónico: Elvia.VeraMiquilena@osumc.edu
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 43201
- Reclutamiento
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
-
Contacto:
- Alberto Uribe, MD
- Número de teléfono: 614-293-0775
- Correo electrónico: alberto.uribe@osumc.edu
-
-
Criterios de participación
Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Sí
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years old.
- Patients undergo elective abdominal laparoscopic/robotic or thoracic video-assisted (VAT) surgeries requiring general anesthesia for greater than 3 hours at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
- Able to provide a signed, written informed consent.
- Able to speak, read, and write in English.
- ASA physical status I-III.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who require emergency surgery or an emergent intervention.
- Any documented cognitive or psychological disorders that, in the investigator's opinion, can interfere with the patient's pain perception.
- Vulnerable populations: pregnant females, prisoners, breastfeeding.
- Presence of any medical condition that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, should exclude the patient from the study (patients with pre-existing neuromuscular diseases.
- Allergy or contraindications to any of the anesthetics, NMB agents, or sugammadex.
- Patients with anatomical abnormalities of the hands or arms that prevent proper placement of the sensors for nerve stimulation.
- Limited access to the monitoring area due to surgical positioning.
- Patients with peripheral vascular disease, since it may affect measurement accuracy.
Plan de estudios
Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Diagnóstico
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: TetraGraph (Senzime) Dominant Hand
Participants will have the TetraGraph (Senzime) electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the dominant hand and the TwitchView (Blink) EMG neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the non-dominant hand.
The device placed on the dominant hand will be used to guide intraoperative neuromuscular blockade management, while measurements from both devices will be collected for comparison of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring performance.
|
The TetraGraph (Senzime) quantitative electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device will be applied to the participant's dominant hand after induction of general anesthesia and prior to neuromuscular blocking agent administration.
Surface electrodes will be placed over the ulnar nerve per manufacturer instructions, and the device will be calibrated to obtain baseline Train-of-Four (TOF) measurements.
Following rocuronium administration, the device will continuously monitor neuromuscular function, recording TOF approximately every 15 seconds and post-tetanic count (PTC) every 5 minutes when TOF count is zero.
As the dominant-hand monitor, its readings will guide rocuronium redosing to maintain deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 0-3) and assess recovery.
During emergence, it will guide reversal, with extubation at TOF ratio ≥0.9.
|
|
Experimental: TwitchView (Blink) Dominant Hand
Participants will have the TwitchView (Blink) electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the dominant hand and the TetraGraph (Senzime) EMG neuromuscular monitoring device placed on the non-dominant hand.
The device placed on the dominant hand will be used to guide intraoperative neuromuscular blockade management, while measurements from both devices will be collected for comparison of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring performance.
|
The TwitchView (Blink) quantitative electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring device will be applied to the participant's dominant hand after induction of general anesthesia and prior to administration of neuromuscular blocking agents.
Surface electrodes will be placed over the ulnar nerve per manufacturer instructions, and the device will be calibrated to obtain baseline Train-of-Four (TOF) measurements.
Following rocuronium administration, neuromuscular function will be continuously monitored, with TOF recorded approximately every 15 seconds and post-tetanic count (PTC) every 5 minutes when TOF count is zero.
As the dominant-hand device, its measurements will guide rocuronium redosing to maintain deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC 0-3) and assess recovery.
During emergence, it will guide reversal, with extubation at TOF ratio ≥0.9.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of intraoperative diaphragmatic movement during deep neuromuscular blockade
Periodo de tiempo: During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.
|
The number of spontaneous diaphragmatic movement events observed during maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade will be recorded and compared between participants monitored with the TetraGraph (Senzime) and TwitchView (Blink) electromyography (EMG) neuromuscular monitoring devices.
|
During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.
|
|
Incidence of spontaneous breath-initiation efforts during deep neuromuscular blockade
Periodo de tiempo: During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.
|
The number of spontaneous breath-initiation efforts observed during maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade will be recorded and compared between participants monitored with the TetraGraph (Senzime) and TwitchView (Blink) EMG neuromuscular monitoring devices.
|
During maintenance of deep neuromuscular blockade throughout the surgical procedure, from achievement of deep neuromuscular blockade after induction of general anesthesia until completion of surgery prior to emergence.
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score
Periodo de tiempo: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
Intubation difficulty will be assessed using the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS), a composite score ranging from 0 upward, where 0 represents easy intubation and higher scores indicate greater intubation difficulty.
|
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
|
Incidence of patient movement or bucking during intubation
Periodo de tiempo: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
Percentage of participants with patient movement or bucking during tracheal intubation, assessed as a clinical indicator of inadequate neuromuscular blockade.
|
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
|
Cormack-Lehane grade of vocal cord visibility during intubation
Periodo de tiempo: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
Vocal cord visibility will be assessed during tracheal intubation using the Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic grading system (Grades I-IV), where Grade I indicates the best glottic view and Grade IV indicates the poorest view.
|
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
|
Vocal cord movement during intubation
Periodo de tiempo: During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
Vocal cord movement will be assessed during tracheal intubation using the predefined study classification (e.g., open, moving, closing, or closed) as an indicator of intubating conditions.
|
During tracheal intubation following induction of general anesthesia and administration of neuromuscular blockade, prior to surgical incision.
|
|
Post-tetanic count (PTC)
Periodo de tiempo: Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
|
Post-tetanic count (PTC), reported as the number of muscle responses (count), will be measured using the TetraGraph and TwitchView neuromuscular monitoring devices and compared for agreement and correlation.
|
Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
|
|
Train-of-four (TOF) count
Periodo de tiempo: Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
|
Train-of-four (TOF) count, reported as the number of twitch responses (0-4), will be measured using the TetraGraph and TwitchView devices and compared for agreement and correlation.
|
Throughout the intraoperative period during maintenance of neuromuscular blockade, from induction of general anesthesia until initiation of emergence from anesthesia.
|
|
Time to recovery of train-of-four ratio >0.9
Periodo de tiempo: During emergence from anesthesia, from administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent until extubation.
|
Time, in minutes, from administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent to achievement of a train-of-four (TOF) ratio >0.9, as measured by the TetraGraph and TwitchView devices.
|
During emergence from anesthesia, from administration of neuromuscular blockade reversal agent until extubation.
|
|
Train-of-four ratio before extubation
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately before extubation following completion of surgery and recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
|
Train-of-four (TOF) ratio, reported as a decimal value from 0 to 1.0 (or percentage), measured immediately before extubation using the TetraGraph and TwitchView devices.
Higher values indicate greater recovery of neuromuscular function.
|
Immediately before extubation following completion of surgery and recovery from neuromuscular blockade.
|
|
System Usability Scale (SUS) score
Periodo de tiempo: Immediately after completion of the intraoperative procedure and device use.
|
Anesthesia care providers will evaluate device usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS), which ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability.
|
Immediately after completion of the intraoperative procedure and device use.
|
|
Leiden Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS) score
Periodo de tiempo: At completion of the surgical procedure, prior to emergence from general anesthesia.
|
Surgeon-rated surgical conditions will be assessed using the Leiden Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS), a 5-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates extremely poor surgical conditions and 5 indicates optimal surgical conditions.
Higher scores indicate better surgical conditions.
|
At completion of the surgical procedure, prior to emergence from general anesthesia.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.
Patrocinador
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.
Publicaciones Generales
- Kopman AF, Brull SJ. Etiology of Acceleromyographic Train-of-four Overshoot: A Hypothesis. Anesthesiology. 2025 Jun 1;142(6):1171-1173. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005377. Epub 2025 Apr 7. No abstract available.
- Blobner M, Frick CG, Stauble RB, Feussner H, Schaller SJ, Unterbuchner C, Lingg C, Geisler M, Fink H. Neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions (NISCO). Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):627-36. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3711-7. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
- Ahluwalia JS, Morley CJ, Mockridge JN. Computerised determination of spontaneous inspiratory and expiratory times in premature neonates during intermittent positive pressure ventilation. II: Results from 20 babies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994 Nov;71(3):F161-4. doi: 10.1136/fn.71.3.f161.
- Bussey L, Jelacic S, Togashi K, Hulvershorn J, Bowdle A. Train-of-four monitoring with the twitchview monitor electctromyograph compared to the GE NMT electromyograph and manual palpation. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Dec;35(6):1477-1483. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00615-7. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
- Matsuda K. [Mechanical properties of dental alloys for clasps]. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi. 1976 Jun;43(2):192. No abstract available. Japanese.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
9 de febrero de 2026
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
9 de febrero de 2028
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
9 de agosto de 2028
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
14 de mayo de 2026
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
9 de julio de 2026
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
15 de julio de 2026
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
15 de julio de 2026
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
9 de julio de 2026
Última verificación
1 de mayo de 2026
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- STUDY20252768
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
INDECISO
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
No
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Sí
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
No
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .