- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT00972010
Study to Evaluate Surgical Excision Margins in Malignant Breast Lumpectomies With the PEAK PlasmaBlade
A Prospective, Controlled Study To Evaluate Surgical Excision Margins in Malignant Breast Lumpectomies With the PEAK PlasmaBlade Compared to Traditional Electrosurgery
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Descrição detalhada
Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is the standard surgical treatment for breast cancer. The goal of BCT is total excision of the malignant lesion while simultaneously preserving the cosmetic appearance and functionality of the breast. Despite advances in technique and pathologic analysis; however, 20-50% of malignant breast lump excisions have cancer present to the edge of the excision margin (defined as a "positive" margin). Excisions that are found to be margin positive require a secondary excision; however, in these cases residual disease is found to be present in only 40-70% of cases. Some researchers have hypothesized that re-excision was unnecessary in a certain percentage of cases. Currently there are no routinely utilized method for intra-operative interpretation of surgical margins. Touch preps or imprint cytology has been used in the past in some centers but it is not used routinely because an experienced cytopathologist is needed to correctly interpret the slides.
The standard of care to evaluate surgical margins is based on permanent section. Margins are considered negative if there is greater than 1 mm of normal tissue between cancer cells to the excised surface. Many factors for this discrepancy have been postulated, including artifact associated with the inking process and with electrosurgery induced damage of the margin during excision (thermal injury); therefore, creating a "false positive" impression of tumor cells present at surgical margins. We propose a clinical study to evaluate the effects of thermal injury in breast cancer excision using traditional electrosurgery (i.e., the "Bovie") compared to the pulsed RF technology with the PEAK PlasmaBlade. We hypothesize that the PlasmaBlade will impart less thermal injury to the incised breast tissue (malignant and normal) and will increase the specificity of the margin status. The majority of breast cancers are removed by traditional electrocautery. We are just starting to utilize this new technology for soft tissue dissection at UCSD.
The PEAK PlasmaBlade is a family of disposable surgical cutting and coagulation devices that offer the exacting control of a scalpel and the bleeding control of traditional electrosurgery without extensive collateral damage. The PlasmaBlade is based on proprietary pulsed plasma technology. This technology represents an evolutionary leap in the advancement of radiofrequency surgical technologies, which originated with traditional electrosurgery and progressed to plasma-mediated energy devices. The PlasmaBlade tissue dissection devices are FDA-cleared and commercially available.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
California
-
La Jolla, California, Estados Unidos, 92037
- Thornton Hospital
-
La Jolla, California, Estados Unidos, 92093
- Rebecca and John Moores Cancer Center
-
San Diego, California, Estados Unidos, 92103
- UCSD Medical Center
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Filho
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria
- Women or men with an established diagnosis of an invasive ductal carcinoma
- Women or men with tumors > 1cm
- Women undergoing Breast Conservation Operations
- Women or men may have had prior chemotherapy as long as their treatment was completed >2 weeks prior to enrollment with recovery from any toxicities
Exclusion Criteria
- No established diagnosis of breast cancer
- Women or men with tumors <1 cm
- Women or men undergoing total mastectomy
- Women or men who have had prior radiation
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Prazo |
|---|---|
|
To compare the thermal injury artifact produced by traditional electrosurgery vs. the PEAK PlasmaBlade by intensive pathologic analysis both by gross inspection, touch imprint, and permanent histologic analysis.
Prazo: 1 year
|
1 year
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Sarah L Blair, MD, University of California, San Diego
Publicações e links úteis
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 090314
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .