Tea Consumption and Cognitive Performance in the Very Old
8 de setembro de 2017 atualizado por: Newcastle University
Higher Tea Consumption is Associated With Better Performance on Measures of Attention and Psychomotor Speed in the Very Old: The Newcastle 85+ Study
Studies have found a beneficial effect of tea consumption on the reduction of risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in older aged populations. However, there is a paucity of data on these associations in the very old defined as individuals aged 85 years and over. Therefore, we hypothesized that higher tea consumption was associated with better global and domain-specific cognitive function. We investigated the relationship between tea consumption in the very old and measures of global cognitive function, memory, attention and psychomotor speed.
The Newcastle 85+ Study was a longitudinal (5-years), population-based cohort study of individuals aged 85+ years in North East England, United Kingdom. The final sample included 676 community-dwelling and institutionalized men and women recruited through general medical practices.
Baseline tea consumption was assessed through a 2x24-hr multiple pass recall and longitudinal measures of global and domain specific (memory, speed and attention) cognitive function through the standardized mini-mental state examination and the cognitive drug research system. Linear mixed models, controlling for demographic (e.g. age, sex and education) and health variables were used to determine whether tea consumption was protective against cognitive decline.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Observacional
Inscrição (Real)
1042
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Newcastle upon Tyne, Reino Unido, NE17RU
- Newcastle University
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
85 anos a 85 anos (Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Sim
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Método de amostragem
Amostra Não Probabilística
População do estudo
Community-dwelling and institutionalized men and women recruited through general medical practices in North East England, UK (n=676) and born in 1921 (85 years old at baseline).
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Born in 1921
- Permanently registered with a participating general practice in Newcastle upon Tyne or North Tyneside primary care trusts in the UK
Exclusion Criteria:
- End-stage illness
- Individuals who might pose a safety risk to a nurse visiting alone, with dementia
- Clinical diagnosis of dementia at baseline
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
low to moderate tea consumption
consumption of 0.4 to 4.6 cups of tea (200 ml) per day (n=463)
|
Assess the global and domain specific (memory, speed and attention) cognitive function at baseline and over 5 years in the high vs. low/moderate tea consumption groups
|
|
High tea consumption
consumption of 4.6 to 11.9 cups of tea (200 ml) per day (n=213)
|
Assess the global and domain specific (memory, speed and attention) cognitive function at baseline and over 5 years in the high vs. low/moderate tea consumption groups
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Standardized mini-mental state examination
Prazo: Baseline
|
Measure of global cognition (Score 0-30)
|
Baseline
|
|
Rate of decline of the standardized mini-mental state examination
Prazo: Baseline to 5 years follow-up
|
Measure of global cognition (Score 0-30)
|
Baseline to 5 years follow-up
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Simple reaction time
Prazo: Baseline
|
Simple reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.
The participant is instructed to press "YES" as quickly as possible every time the word "YES" is presented on the screen.
In total, 30 "YES" stimuli are presented with varying inter-stimulus interval.
(ms)
|
Baseline
|
|
Rate of reaction speed decline
Prazo: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
Simple reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.The participant is instructed to press "YES" as quickly as possible every time the word "YES" is presented on the screen.
In total, 30 "YES" stimuli are presented with varying inter-stimulus interval.
(ms)
|
Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
|
Choice reaction time
Prazo: Baseline
|
Choice reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.
Either the word "YES" or "NO" is presented on the screen and the participant is instructed to press the corresponding button as quickly as possible.
There are 30 trials for each stimulus word, which is chosen randomly with equal probability, with varying inter-stimulus interval.
(ms)
|
Baseline
|
|
Rate of reaction choice decline
Prazo: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
Choice reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.Either the word "YES" or "NO" is presented on the screen and the participant is instructed to press the corresponding button as quickly as possible.
There are 30 trials for each stimulus word, which is chosen randomly with equal probability, with varying inter-stimulus interval.
(ms)
|
Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
|
Digit vigilance task
Prazo: Baseline
|
Digit vigilance task assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.
Target digit is randomly selected and constantly displayed to the right of the screen.
A series of digits (0-9) are presented in the centre of the screen at the rate of 150 per minute.
The participant is required to press the "YES" button as quickly as possible every time the digit in the series matches the target digit.
There are 300 digits in the series and the task lasts for 2 minutes.
(ms)
|
Baseline
|
|
Rate of digit vigilance task decline
Prazo: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
Digit vigilance task assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.
Target digit is randomly selected and constantly displayed to the right of the screen.
A series of digits (0-9) are presented in the centre of the screen at the rate of 150 per minute.
The participant is required to press the "YES" button as quickly as possible every time the digit in the series matches the target digit.
There are 300 digits in the series and the task lasts for 2 minutes.
(ms)
|
Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
|
Word recognition
Prazo: Baseline
|
Word recognition was assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.
A list of words is presented on screen for the subject to remember.
Immediately after the presentation the subject is asked to recall as many words as possible.
20 minutes later, the same list of words is presented with added distracter words.
For each word, the subject is asked to indicate whether or not it belongs o the original list by pressing 'YES' or 'NO'.
|
Baseline
|
|
Rate of word recognition decline
Prazo: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
Word recognition was assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system.
The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.A list of words is presented on screen for the subject to remember.
Immediately after the presentation the subject is asked to recall as many words as possible.
20 minutes later, the same list of words is presented with added distracter words.
For each word, the subject is asked to indicate whether or not it belongs to the original list by pressing 'YES' or 'NO'.
|
Baseline to 3 years follow-up
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Tom Kirkwood, Newcastle University
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
1 de junho de 2006
Conclusão Primária (Real)
1 de março de 2013
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
1 de março de 2013
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
14 de agosto de 2017
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
8 de setembro de 2017
Primeira postagem (Real)
12 de setembro de 2017
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
12 de setembro de 2017
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
8 de setembro de 2017
Última verificação
1 de setembro de 2017
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- UNewcastle
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
SIM
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Data request
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .