Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Tea Consumption and Cognitive Performance in the Very Old

8 września 2017 zaktualizowane przez: Newcastle University

Higher Tea Consumption is Associated With Better Performance on Measures of Attention and Psychomotor Speed in the Very Old: The Newcastle 85+ Study

Studies have found a beneficial effect of tea consumption on the reduction of risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in older aged populations. However, there is a paucity of data on these associations in the very old defined as individuals aged 85 years and over. Therefore, we hypothesized that higher tea consumption was associated with better global and domain-specific cognitive function. We investigated the relationship between tea consumption in the very old and measures of global cognitive function, memory, attention and psychomotor speed.

The Newcastle 85+ Study was a longitudinal (5-years), population-based cohort study of individuals aged 85+ years in North East England, United Kingdom. The final sample included 676 community-dwelling and institutionalized men and women recruited through general medical practices.

Baseline tea consumption was assessed through a 2x24-hr multiple pass recall and longitudinal measures of global and domain specific (memory, speed and attention) cognitive function through the standardized mini-mental state examination and the cognitive drug research system. Linear mixed models, controlling for demographic (e.g. age, sex and education) and health variables were used to determine whether tea consumption was protective against cognitive decline.

Przegląd badań

Status

Zakończony

Warunki

Typ studiów

Obserwacyjny

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

1042

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Lokalizacje studiów

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

85 lat do 85 lat (Starszy dorosły)

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Tak

Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki

Wszystko

Metoda próbkowania

Próbka bez prawdopodobieństwa

Badana populacja

Community-dwelling and institutionalized men and women recruited through general medical practices in North East England, UK (n=676) and born in 1921 (85 years old at baseline).

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Born in 1921
  • Permanently registered with a participating general practice in Newcastle upon Tyne or North Tyneside primary care trusts in the UK

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage illness
  • Individuals who might pose a safety risk to a nurse visiting alone, with dementia
  • Clinical diagnosis of dementia at baseline

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

Kohorty i interwencje

Grupa / Kohorta
Interwencja / Leczenie
low to moderate tea consumption
consumption of 0.4 to 4.6 cups of tea (200 ml) per day (n=463)
Assess the global and domain specific (memory, speed and attention) cognitive function at baseline and over 5 years in the high vs. low/moderate tea consumption groups
High tea consumption
consumption of 4.6 to 11.9 cups of tea (200 ml) per day (n=213)
Assess the global and domain specific (memory, speed and attention) cognitive function at baseline and over 5 years in the high vs. low/moderate tea consumption groups

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Standardized mini-mental state examination
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
Measure of global cognition (Score 0-30)
Baseline
Rate of decline of the standardized mini-mental state examination
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 5 years follow-up
Measure of global cognition (Score 0-30)
Baseline to 5 years follow-up

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Simple reaction time
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
Simple reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box. The participant is instructed to press "YES" as quickly as possible every time the word "YES" is presented on the screen. In total, 30 "YES" stimuli are presented with varying inter-stimulus interval. (ms)
Baseline
Rate of reaction speed decline
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
Simple reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.The participant is instructed to press "YES" as quickly as possible every time the word "YES" is presented on the screen. In total, 30 "YES" stimuli are presented with varying inter-stimulus interval. (ms)
Baseline to 3 years follow-up
Choice reaction time
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
Choice reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box. Either the word "YES" or "NO" is presented on the screen and the participant is instructed to press the corresponding button as quickly as possible. There are 30 trials for each stimulus word, which is chosen randomly with equal probability, with varying inter-stimulus interval. (ms)
Baseline
Rate of reaction choice decline
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
Choice reaction time assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.Either the word "YES" or "NO" is presented on the screen and the participant is instructed to press the corresponding button as quickly as possible. There are 30 trials for each stimulus word, which is chosen randomly with equal probability, with varying inter-stimulus interval. (ms)
Baseline to 3 years follow-up
Digit vigilance task
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
Digit vigilance task assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box. Target digit is randomly selected and constantly displayed to the right of the screen. A series of digits (0-9) are presented in the centre of the screen at the rate of 150 per minute. The participant is required to press the "YES" button as quickly as possible every time the digit in the series matches the target digit. There are 300 digits in the series and the task lasts for 2 minutes. (ms)
Baseline
Rate of digit vigilance task decline
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
Digit vigilance task assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box. Target digit is randomly selected and constantly displayed to the right of the screen. A series of digits (0-9) are presented in the centre of the screen at the rate of 150 per minute. The participant is required to press the "YES" button as quickly as possible every time the digit in the series matches the target digit. There are 300 digits in the series and the task lasts for 2 minutes. (ms)
Baseline to 3 years follow-up
Word recognition
Ramy czasowe: Baseline
Word recognition was assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box. A list of words is presented on screen for the subject to remember. Immediately after the presentation the subject is asked to recall as many words as possible. 20 minutes later, the same list of words is presented with added distracter words. For each word, the subject is asked to indicate whether or not it belongs o the original list by pressing 'YES' or 'NO'.
Baseline
Rate of word recognition decline
Ramy czasowe: Baseline to 3 years follow-up
Word recognition was assessed using the Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised system. The CDR tasks were presented on a hi-resolution Windows-based laptop computer (Motion Computing LE1600 Tablet PC with keyboard accessory) and participants responded using a two-button (NO/YES) response box.A list of words is presented on screen for the subject to remember. Immediately after the presentation the subject is asked to recall as many words as possible. 20 minutes later, the same list of words is presented with added distracter words. For each word, the subject is asked to indicate whether or not it belongs to the original list by pressing 'YES' or 'NO'.
Baseline to 3 years follow-up

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Tom Kirkwood, Newcastle University

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 czerwca 2006

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

1 marca 2013

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 marca 2013

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

14 sierpnia 2017

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

8 września 2017

Pierwszy wysłany (Rzeczywisty)

12 września 2017

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

12 września 2017

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

8 września 2017

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 września 2017

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • UNewcastle

Plan dla danych uczestnika indywidualnego (IPD)

Planujesz udostępniać dane poszczególnych uczestników (IPD)?

TAK

Kryteria dostępu do udostępniania IPD

Data request

Informacje o lekach i urządzeniach, dokumenty badawcze

Bada produkt leczniczy regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Bada produkt urządzenia regulowany przez amerykańską FDA

Nie

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Badania kliniczne na Cognitive performance and cognitive decline

Subskrybuj