Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System Hi-Fi Study
9 de março de 2021 atualizado por: Nuvectra
Clinical Trial Comparing Ultra-High Versus Traditional Pulse Widths Using the ALGOVITA® SCS System High Fidelity Stimulation in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Back and/or Leg Pain Following Spinal Surgery
The objective of this study is to obtain post-market clinical outcome data for the Algovita SCS System when used on-label, according to the applicable directions for use, using high fidelity tonic stimulation at either ultra-high pulse width or traditional pulse width for the treatment of persistent or recurrent back and/or leg pain following spinal surgery.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Rescindido
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
20
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 85712
- Pain Institute of Southern Arizona
-
-
California
-
Newport Beach, California, Estados Unidos, 92660
- Newport Beach Headache & Pain
-
Santa Rosa, California, Estados Unidos, 95401
- Summit Pain Alliance
-
-
Colorado
-
Colorado Springs, Colorado, Estados Unidos, 80919
- Spinal Diagnostics & Pain Management
-
-
Kansas
-
Overland Park, Kansas, Estados Unidos, 66210
- Mid-America PolyClinic & Interventional Pain Management Specialists
-
-
Louisiana
-
Shreveport, Louisiana, Estados Unidos, 71105
- WK River Cities Clinical Research Center
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02467
- Brigham & Women's Hospital
-
-
Ohio
-
Chillicothe, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 45601
- Adena Spine Center
-
Cleveland, Ohio, Estados Unidos, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, Estados Unidos, 02903
- Comprehensive Spine Center at Rhode Island Hospital
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos a 75 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with FBSS defined as persistent or recurrent back and/or leg pain despite one or more anatomically successful back surgeries for the same original pain.
- Age 18-75 years old at consent.
- Targeted pain intensity of ≥ 5 out of 10 on the Baseline visit NRS.
- ODI score of 41-80 out of 100 at the Baseline visit.
- Appropriate candidate for the surgical procedure and Algovita SCS therapy based on the clinical judgment of the investigator and the Algovita Instructions for Provider (IFP) in the Nuvectra product manuals.
- On stable pain medications for at least 28 days prior to consent. Stable is defined as no new or discontinued pain medications and no changes to total daily dose of any pain medications.
- Willing and capable of providing informed consent.
- Willing and able of complying with the study-related requirements, procedures, and visits.
- Speaks English as a primary language (as the Algovita patient manuals are only currently available in English).
- Has adequate cognitive ability to use the subject devices (e.g., PPC, PoP), as determined by the investigator.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has a medical/psychological/psychiatric condition/disorder that could interfere with study procedures as determined by the investigator.
- Has a coexisting pain condition that might confound pain ratings, as determined by the investigator.
- Has a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy.
- Has an existing drug pump, SCS System, or other active implantable device.
- Has any prior SCS experience.
- Pregnant or planning to become (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile, or be at least 2 years postmenopausal).
- For subjects with diabetes, HbA1c ≥ 8.5% as measured at the Baseline visit (or within the 3 months prior to the Baseline visit).
- Participating in another clinical trial that could affect the outcomes or requirements of this study as determined by the investigator.
- Involved in an injury claim under current litigation or have a pending or approved workers compensation claim.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
- Mascaramento: Triplo
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: Ultra-high pulse width
Ultra-high pulse width stimulation using the Algovita System
|
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System with associated components
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Traditional pulse width
Traditional pulse width stimulation using the Algovita System
|
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System with associated components
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness of targeted pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Week 25
|
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain from baseline, as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain. Effectiveness will be compared both descriptively and statistically between the two randomized treatment groups using crossover analysis methods. |
Week 25
|
|
Rate of serious study-related adverse events (AEs) in each treatment arm
Prazo: From Permanent Implant through Week 25
|
The rate of serious study-related AEs.
Study-related AEs are defined as any device, procedure and therapy/stimulation-related AEs.
|
From Permanent Implant through Week 25
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness of targeted pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Week 12 and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
|
Week 12 and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Effectiveness of back and/or leg pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in back and/or leg pain as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Effectiveness of targeted, back and/or leg pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will range from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain imaginable).
A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Change in targeted, back and/or leg pain compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The mean change and percent change from baseline in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS).
The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Change in targeted, back and/or leg pain compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The mean change and percent change from baseline in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will range from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain imaginable).
A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Clinician Global Impression of Change score in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The Investigator's assessment of change in the overall status of the participant using the standard Clinician Global Impression of Change ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Change in disability compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The change from baseline in disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index.
The Oswestry Disability Index is scored between 0 and 100 with higher scores indicating a greater disability.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Change in quality of life compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The change from baseline in quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, a standardized measure of health status.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Change in patient activity per the Pain Disability Index score in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The change from baseline in patient activity as measured by the Pain Disability Index score.
The Pain Disability Index is a self-report asking participants to rate how much pain interferes in seven areas of life activity using a 0 (no disability) to 10 (total disability) numeric rating scale.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change score in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
The participant's assessment of change in their overall status using the standard Patient Global Impression of Change ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Participant satisfaction per the subject satisfaction survey outcome in each treatment arm
Prazo: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
Participant satisfaction using a subject satisfaction survey (5 point Likert scale format) ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied.
|
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
|
|
Evaluation of trial success rates
Prazo: From Trial Implant to End of Trail
|
The percentage of participants that have a successful trial phase, defined as at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain compared to baseline.
|
From Trial Implant to End of Trail
|
|
Rate of surgical re-intervention of the SCS system
Prazo: From Permanent Implant through Month 24
|
Rate of surgical re-intervention of the SCS system for participants with a permanent implant.
|
From Permanent Implant through Month 24
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Ben Tranchina, Nuvectra
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
2 de novembro de 2018
Conclusão Primária (Real)
27 de abril de 2020
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
27 de abril de 2020
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
26 de julho de 2018
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
7 de agosto de 2018
Primeira postagem (Real)
9 de agosto de 2018
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
11 de março de 2021
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
9 de março de 2021
Última verificação
1 de março de 2021
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- CLRE 1092
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Sim
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Sim
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .