Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System Hi-Fi Study

9. März 2021 aktualisiert von: Nuvectra

Clinical Trial Comparing Ultra-High Versus Traditional Pulse Widths Using the ALGOVITA® SCS System High Fidelity Stimulation in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Back and/or Leg Pain Following Spinal Surgery

The objective of this study is to obtain post-market clinical outcome data for the Algovita SCS System when used on-label, according to the applicable directions for use, using high fidelity tonic stimulation at either ultra-high pulse width or traditional pulse width for the treatment of persistent or recurrent back and/or leg pain following spinal surgery.

Studienübersicht

Status

Beendet

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

20

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, Vereinigte Staaten, 85712
        • Pain Institute of Southern Arizona
    • California
      • Newport Beach, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 92660
        • Newport Beach Headache & Pain
      • Santa Rosa, California, Vereinigte Staaten, 95401
        • Summit Pain Alliance
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, Vereinigte Staaten, 80919
        • Spinal Diagnostics & Pain Management
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, Vereinigte Staaten, 66210
        • Mid-America PolyClinic & Interventional Pain Management Specialists
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, Vereinigte Staaten, 71105
        • WK River Cities Clinical Research Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, Vereinigte Staaten, 02467
        • Brigham & Women's Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Chillicothe, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 45601
        • Adena Spine Center
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Vereinigte Staaten, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, Vereinigte Staaten, 02903
        • Comprehensive Spine Center at Rhode Island Hospital

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre bis 75 Jahre (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with FBSS defined as persistent or recurrent back and/or leg pain despite one or more anatomically successful back surgeries for the same original pain.
  • Age 18-75 years old at consent.
  • Targeted pain intensity of ≥ 5 out of 10 on the Baseline visit NRS.
  • ODI score of 41-80 out of 100 at the Baseline visit.
  • Appropriate candidate for the surgical procedure and Algovita SCS therapy based on the clinical judgment of the investigator and the Algovita Instructions for Provider (IFP) in the Nuvectra product manuals.
  • On stable pain medications for at least 28 days prior to consent. Stable is defined as no new or discontinued pain medications and no changes to total daily dose of any pain medications.
  • Willing and capable of providing informed consent.
  • Willing and able of complying with the study-related requirements, procedures, and visits.
  • Speaks English as a primary language (as the Algovita patient manuals are only currently available in English).
  • Has adequate cognitive ability to use the subject devices (e.g., PPC, PoP), as determined by the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a medical/psychological/psychiatric condition/disorder that could interfere with study procedures as determined by the investigator.
  • Has a coexisting pain condition that might confound pain ratings, as determined by the investigator.
  • Has a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy.
  • Has an existing drug pump, SCS System, or other active implantable device.
  • Has any prior SCS experience.
  • Pregnant or planning to become (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile, or be at least 2 years postmenopausal).
  • For subjects with diabetes, HbA1c ≥ 8.5% as measured at the Baseline visit (or within the 3 months prior to the Baseline visit).
  • Participating in another clinical trial that could affect the outcomes or requirements of this study as determined by the investigator.
  • Involved in an injury claim under current litigation or have a pending or approved workers compensation claim.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Crossover-Aufgabe
  • Maskierung: Verdreifachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: Ultra-high pulse width
Ultra-high pulse width stimulation using the Algovita System
Gerät: Ultra-high pulse width stimulation
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System with associated components
Aktiver Komparator: Traditional pulse width
Traditional pulse width stimulation using the Algovita System
Gerät: Traditional pulse width stimulation
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System with associated components

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Effectiveness of targeted pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Week 25

The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain from baseline, as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.

Effectiveness will be compared both descriptively and statistically between the two randomized treatment groups using crossover analysis methods.
Week 25
Rate of serious study-related adverse events (AEs) in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: From Permanent Implant through Week 25
The rate of serious study-related AEs. Study-related AEs are defined as any device, procedure and therapy/stimulation-related AEs.
From Permanent Implant through Week 25

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Effectiveness of targeted pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Week 12 and Months 12, 18 and 24
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
Week 12 and Months 12, 18 and 24
Effectiveness of back and/or leg pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in back and/or leg pain as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Effectiveness of targeted, back and/or leg pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will range from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain imaginable). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in targeted, back and/or leg pain compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The mean change and percent change from baseline in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in targeted, back and/or leg pain compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The mean change and percent change from baseline in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will range from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain imaginable). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Clinician Global Impression of Change score in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The Investigator's assessment of change in the overall status of the participant using the standard Clinician Global Impression of Change ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in disability compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The change from baseline in disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. The Oswestry Disability Index is scored between 0 and 100 with higher scores indicating a greater disability.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in quality of life compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The change from baseline in quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, a standardized measure of health status.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in patient activity per the Pain Disability Index score in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The change from baseline in patient activity as measured by the Pain Disability Index score. The Pain Disability Index is a self-report asking participants to rate how much pain interferes in seven areas of life activity using a 0 (no disability) to 10 (total disability) numeric rating scale.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Patient Global Impression of Change score in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The participant's assessment of change in their overall status using the standard Patient Global Impression of Change ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Participant satisfaction per the subject satisfaction survey outcome in each treatment arm
Zeitfenster: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Participant satisfaction using a subject satisfaction survey (5 point Likert scale format) ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Evaluation of trial success rates
Zeitfenster: From Trial Implant to End of Trail
The percentage of participants that have a successful trial phase, defined as at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain compared to baseline.
From Trial Implant to End of Trail
Rate of surgical re-intervention of the SCS system
Zeitfenster: From Permanent Implant through Month 24
Rate of surgical re-intervention of the SCS system for participants with a permanent implant.
From Permanent Implant through Month 24

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Nuvectra

Mitarbeiter

Bright Research Partners

Ermittler

  • Studienleiter: Ben Tranchina, Nuvectra

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

2. November 2018

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

27. April 2020

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

27. April 2020

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

26. Juli 2018

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

7. August 2018

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

9. August 2018

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

11. März 2021

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

9. März 2021

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. März 2021

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • CLRE 1092

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Ja

Produkt, das in den USA hergestellt und aus den USA exportiert wird

Ja

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Chronischer Schmerz

Klinische Studien zur Ultra-high pulse width stimulation

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Oman

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

3
Abonnieren