Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System Hi-Fi Study

9. marts 2021 opdateret af: Nuvectra

Clinical Trial Comparing Ultra-High Versus Traditional Pulse Widths Using the ALGOVITA® SCS System High Fidelity Stimulation in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Back and/or Leg Pain Following Spinal Surgery

The objective of this study is to obtain post-market clinical outcome data for the Algovita SCS System when used on-label, according to the applicable directions for use, using high fidelity tonic stimulation at either ultra-high pulse width or traditional pulse width for the treatment of persistent or recurrent back and/or leg pain following spinal surgery.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

20

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Forenede Stater
    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, Forenede Stater, 85712
        • Pain Institute of Southern Arizona
    • California
      • Newport Beach, California, Forenede Stater, 92660
        • Newport Beach Headache & Pain
      • Santa Rosa, California, Forenede Stater, 95401
        • Summit Pain Alliance
    • Colorado
      • Colorado Springs, Colorado, Forenede Stater, 80919
        • Spinal Diagnostics & Pain Management
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, Forenede Stater, 66210
        • Mid-America PolyClinic & Interventional Pain Management Specialists
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, Forenede Stater, 71105
        • WK River Cities Clinical Research Center
    • Massachusetts
      • Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02467
        • Brigham & Women's Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Chillicothe, Ohio, Forenede Stater, 45601
        • Adena Spine Center
      • Cleveland, Ohio, Forenede Stater, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, Forenede Stater, 02903
        • Comprehensive Spine Center at Rhode Island Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 75 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with FBSS defined as persistent or recurrent back and/or leg pain despite one or more anatomically successful back surgeries for the same original pain.
  • Age 18-75 years old at consent.
  • Targeted pain intensity of ≥ 5 out of 10 on the Baseline visit NRS.
  • ODI score of 41-80 out of 100 at the Baseline visit.
  • Appropriate candidate for the surgical procedure and Algovita SCS therapy based on the clinical judgment of the investigator and the Algovita Instructions for Provider (IFP) in the Nuvectra product manuals.
  • On stable pain medications for at least 28 days prior to consent. Stable is defined as no new or discontinued pain medications and no changes to total daily dose of any pain medications.
  • Willing and capable of providing informed consent.
  • Willing and able of complying with the study-related requirements, procedures, and visits.
  • Speaks English as a primary language (as the Algovita patient manuals are only currently available in English).
  • Has adequate cognitive ability to use the subject devices (e.g., PPC, PoP), as determined by the investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a medical/psychological/psychiatric condition/disorder that could interfere with study procedures as determined by the investigator.
  • Has a coexisting pain condition that might confound pain ratings, as determined by the investigator.
  • Has a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy.
  • Has an existing drug pump, SCS System, or other active implantable device.
  • Has any prior SCS experience.
  • Pregnant or planning to become (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile, or be at least 2 years postmenopausal).
  • For subjects with diabetes, HbA1c ≥ 8.5% as measured at the Baseline visit (or within the 3 months prior to the Baseline visit).
  • Participating in another clinical trial that could affect the outcomes or requirements of this study as determined by the investigator.
  • Involved in an injury claim under current litigation or have a pending or approved workers compensation claim.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Crossover opgave
  • Maskning: Tredobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Ultra-high pulse width
Ultra-high pulse width stimulation using the Algovita System
Enhed: Ultra-high pulse width stimulation
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System with associated components
Aktiv komparator: Traditional pulse width
Traditional pulse width stimulation using the Algovita System
Enhed: Traditional pulse width stimulation
Algovita Spinal Cord Stimulation System with associated components

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Effectiveness of targeted pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Week 25

The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain from baseline, as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.

Effectiveness will be compared both descriptively and statistically between the two randomized treatment groups using crossover analysis methods.
Week 25
Rate of serious study-related adverse events (AEs) in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: From Permanent Implant through Week 25
The rate of serious study-related AEs. Study-related AEs are defined as any device, procedure and therapy/stimulation-related AEs.
From Permanent Implant through Week 25

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Effectiveness of targeted pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Week 12 and Months 12, 18 and 24
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
Week 12 and Months 12, 18 and 24
Effectiveness of back and/or leg pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in back and/or leg pain as assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Effectiveness of targeted, back and/or leg pain reduction compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The percentage of participants who experience at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will range from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain imaginable). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in targeted, back and/or leg pain compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The mean change and percent change from baseline in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will range from 0 to 10 with a higher score indicating a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in targeted, back and/or leg pain compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The mean change and percent change from baseline in targeted, back and/or leg pain as assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) will range from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (worst pain imaginable). A higher score indicates a higher level of pain.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Clinician Global Impression of Change score in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The Investigator's assessment of change in the overall status of the participant using the standard Clinician Global Impression of Change ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in disability compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The change from baseline in disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index. The Oswestry Disability Index is scored between 0 and 100 with higher scores indicating a greater disability.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in quality of life compared to baseline in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The change from baseline in quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L, a standardized measure of health status.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Change in patient activity per the Pain Disability Index score in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The change from baseline in patient activity as measured by the Pain Disability Index score. The Pain Disability Index is a self-report asking participants to rate how much pain interferes in seven areas of life activity using a 0 (no disability) to 10 (total disability) numeric rating scale.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Patient Global Impression of Change score in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
The participant's assessment of change in their overall status using the standard Patient Global Impression of Change ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Participant satisfaction per the subject satisfaction survey outcome in each treatment arm
Tidsramme: Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Participant satisfaction using a subject satisfaction survey (5 point Likert scale format) ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied.
Weeks 12 and 25, and Months 12, 18 and 24
Evaluation of trial success rates
Tidsramme: From Trial Implant to End of Trail
The percentage of participants that have a successful trial phase, defined as at least a 50 percent reduction in targeted pain compared to baseline.
From Trial Implant to End of Trail
Rate of surgical re-intervention of the SCS system
Tidsramme: From Permanent Implant through Month 24
Rate of surgical re-intervention of the SCS system for participants with a permanent implant.
From Permanent Implant through Month 24

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

Nuvectra

Samarbejdspartnere

Bright Research Partners

Efterforskere

  • Studieleder: Ben Tranchina, Nuvectra

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

2. november 2018

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

27. april 2020

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

27. april 2020

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

26. juli 2018

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

7. august 2018

Først opslået (Faktiske)

9. august 2018

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

11. marts 2021

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

9. marts 2021

Sidst verificeret

1. marts 2021

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • CLRE 1092

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

INGEN

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ja

produkt fremstillet i og eksporteret fra U.S.A.

Ja

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Kronisk smerte

Kliniske forsøg med Ultra-high pulse width stimulation

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Bulgaria

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

3
Abonner