- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT05574660
Effect of High-fat/High-sugar Diet on Food Reward Signaling
Influence of High Fat Feeding on Brain and Behaviour in Individuals at Genetic Risk of Obesity
In this randomized, single-blinded basic research study, healthy normal-weight human participants are exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack twice a day for eight weeks in addition to their regular diet. All participants are tested at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention.
At all time points the investigators acquire the following parameters:
- Body weight and composition,
- Blood parameters to control for metabolic changes,
- Visual analog scales (hunger, satiety, tiredness, etc.),
- Fat and sugar concentration preference,
- Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during a learning and a gustatory perception task.
The investigators hypothesize that the habitual consumption of a small HF/HS snack will reduce the preference for low-fat concentrations and will have an impact on brain response to the anticipation and consumption of palatable food. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize, that HF/HS diet will have an impact neuronal encoding of learning independent of food cues. The investigators expect these alterations independent of body weight gain suggesting a direct effect of HF/HS diet on neuronal circuits.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Descrição detalhada
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- right handed
- non-smoker (for the last 1 year not smoked more than 2 cigarettes per month)
- Body Mass Index between 20-27 kg/m2 (healthy weight)
Exclusion Criteria:
- serious or unstable medical illness (e.g., cancer);
- past or current history of alcoholism or consistent drug use;
- current and history of major psychiatric illness as defined by the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) criteria including eating disorders,
- medications that affect alertness (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines, chloral hydrate, haloperidol, lithium, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.) and any psychoactive drugs or anti-obesity agents;
- history of major head trauma with loss of consciousness;
- ongoing pregnancy;
- known taste or smell dysfunction;
- a diagnosis of diabetes;
- any known food allergy, certain food sensitivities (lactose);
- pregnant or nursing women,
- history of metalworking, injury with shrapnel or metal slivers, and major surgery;
- history of pacemaker or neurostimulator implantation.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Ciência básica
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet
Participants randomized to consume an HF/HS yoghurt (40.8 % kcal from fat, 45.6 % kcal from carbohydrates, 13 % kcal from protein of 79.5 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.
|
|
|
Experimental: Low-Fat/Low-Sugar (LF/LS) Diet
Participants randomized to consume an LF/LS yoghurt (17.1 % kcal from fat, 29.1 % kcal from carbohydrates, 51.9 % kcal from protein of 78 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in fat taste preference after 8-weeks dietary intervention
Prazo: Preference (wanting and liking) for different fat and sugar concentrations was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
|
In the fat and sugar concentration preference task, the preference and perception are evaluated using a series of puddings with varying fat content (0%, 3.1%, 6.9%, and 15.6 %), and sugar concentration using apple juice with varying sucrose content (0 M, 0.1 M, 0.56 M, and 1 M).
Each pudding and juice concentration is tested 12 times and the average is calculated.
"Wanting" and "Liking" are assessed for all concentrations and the change between baseline and the post-intervention is assessed in both HF/HS and LF/LS groups.
|
Preference (wanting and liking) for different fat and sugar concentrations was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
|
|
Change brain response to milkshake anticipation and milkshake consumption after 8-weeks dietary intervention
Prazo: BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) response to milkshake anticipation and consumption was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
|
To test the effect of the dietary intervention on brain responses to milkshake anticipation (milkshake predicting cue) and consumption (milkshake delivery), the investigators performed a gustatory perception task.
The BOLD response while milkshake cue presentation and milkshake delivery was compared between baseline and postintervention and compared between groups.
|
BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) response to milkshake anticipation and consumption was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
|
|
Change in neuronal encoding of prediction error processing after 8-weeks dietary intervention.
Prazo: BOLD response related to choice prediction error was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. (http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/Cogent/index.html).For further analysis, the investigators calculated the average rating across the total 12.
|
A short version of the sensory learning task as described in detail by Iglesias et al. (2019) was performed to assess associative learning independent of food rewards, while undergoing fMRI.
Within this model, the investigators computed the (signed) adaptive precision error relating to the precision-weighted choice prediction error about visual outcome, that is, the product of choice prediction error (a) and the adaptive learning rate (b).
The investigators tested the BOLD response related to choice prediction error and compared it between baseline and post-intervention and between the HF/HS and LF/LS group.
|
BOLD response related to choice prediction error was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. (http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/Cogent/index.html).For further analysis, the investigators calculated the average rating across the total 12.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Jens C Bruening, MD, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research
- Investigador principal: Dana M Small, PhD, Yale University
- Investigador principal: Marc Tittgemeyer, PhD, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HF-01
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .