Effect of High-fat/High-sugar Diet on Food Reward Signaling

October 7, 2022 updated by: Marc Tittgemeyer, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research

Influence of High Fat Feeding on Brain and Behaviour in Individuals at Genetic Risk of Obesity

In this randomized, single-blinded basic research study, healthy normal-weight human participants are exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack twice a day for eight weeks in addition to their regular diet. All participants are tested at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention.

At all time points the investigators acquire the following parameters:

  • Body weight and composition,
  • Blood parameters to control for metabolic changes,
  • Visual analog scales (hunger, satiety, tiredness, etc.),
  • Fat and sugar concentration preference,
  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) during a learning and a gustatory perception task.

The investigators hypothesize that the habitual consumption of a small HF/HS snack will reduce the preference for low-fat concentrations and will have an impact on brain response to the anticipation and consumption of palatable food. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize, that HF/HS diet will have an impact neuronal encoding of learning independent of food cues. The investigators expect these alterations independent of body weight gain suggesting a direct effect of HF/HS diet on neuronal circuits.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this randomized, single-blinded basic research study, healthy normal-weight human participants are exposed to a high-fat/high-sugar (HF/HS) snack or a low-fat/low-sugar (LF/LS) snack twice a day for eight weeks in addition to their regular diet. The investigators test the effect of this dietary intervention on body weight, metabolic parameters such as insulin sensitivity, blood cholesterol and triglycerides, the preference of fat and sugar taste, the brain response to milkshake anticipation and consumption, and as the neuronal coding of prediction error learning. Here, all participants are tested at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of dietary intervention using behavioral tasks, fMRI and blood sampling. The investigators hypothesize that the habitual consumption of a small HF/HS snack will reduce the preference for low-fat concentrations and impact brain response to the anticipation and consumption of palatable food. Moreover, the investigators hypothesize, that HF/HS diet will have an impact neuronal encoding of learning independent of food cues. The investigators expect these alterations independent of body weight gain suggesting a direct effect of HF/HS diet on neuronal circuits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • right handed
  • non-smoker (for the last 1 year not smoked more than 2 cigarettes per month)
  • Body Mass Index between 20-27 kg/m2 (healthy weight)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. serious or unstable medical illness (e.g., cancer);
  2. past or current history of alcoholism or consistent drug use;
  3. current and history of major psychiatric illness as defined by the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) criteria including eating disorders,
  4. medications that affect alertness (e.g., barbiturates, benzodiazepines, chloral hydrate, haloperidol, lithium, carbamazepine, phenytoin, etc.) and any psychoactive drugs or anti-obesity agents;
  5. history of major head trauma with loss of consciousness;
  6. ongoing pregnancy;
  7. known taste or smell dysfunction;
  8. a diagnosis of diabetes;
  9. any known food allergy, certain food sensitivities (lactose);
  10. pregnant or nursing women,
  11. history of metalworking, injury with shrapnel or metal slivers, and major surgery;
  12. history of pacemaker or neurostimulator implantation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet
Participants randomized to consume an HF/HS yoghurt (40.8 % kcal from fat, 45.6 % kcal from carbohydrates, 13 % kcal from protein of 79.5 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.
Experimental: Low-Fat/Low-Sugar (LF/LS) Diet
Participants randomized to consume an LF/LS yoghurt (17.1 % kcal from fat, 29.1 % kcal from carbohydrates, 51.9 % kcal from protein of 78 total kcal) two times a day for eight weeks in addition to their normal diet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in fat taste preference after 8-weeks dietary intervention
Time Frame: Preference (wanting and liking) for different fat and sugar concentrations was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
In the fat and sugar concentration preference task, the preference and perception are evaluated using a series of puddings with varying fat content (0%, 3.1%, 6.9%, and 15.6 %), and sugar concentration using apple juice with varying sucrose content (0 M, 0.1 M, 0.56 M, and 1 M). Each pudding and juice concentration is tested 12 times and the average is calculated. "Wanting" and "Liking" are assessed for all concentrations and the change between baseline and the post-intervention is assessed in both HF/HS and LF/LS groups.
Preference (wanting and liking) for different fat and sugar concentrations was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
Change brain response to milkshake anticipation and milkshake consumption after 8-weeks dietary intervention
Time Frame: BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) response to milkshake anticipation and consumption was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
To test the effect of the dietary intervention on brain responses to milkshake anticipation (milkshake predicting cue) and consumption (milkshake delivery), the investigators performed a gustatory perception task. The BOLD response while milkshake cue presentation and milkshake delivery was compared between baseline and postintervention and compared between groups.
BOLD (blood oxygen level-dependent) response to milkshake anticipation and consumption was assessed at baseline and after the 8-weeks intervention.
Change in neuronal encoding of prediction error processing after 8-weeks dietary intervention.
Time Frame: BOLD response related to choice prediction error was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. (http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/Cogent/index.html).For further analysis, the investigators calculated the average rating across the total 12.
A short version of the sensory learning task as described in detail by Iglesias et al. (2019) was performed to assess associative learning independent of food rewards, while undergoing fMRI. Within this model, the investigators computed the (signed) adaptive precision error relating to the precision-weighted choice prediction error about visual outcome, that is, the product of choice prediction error (a) and the adaptive learning rate (b). The investigators tested the BOLD response related to choice prediction error and compared it between baseline and post-intervention and between the HF/HS and LF/LS group.
BOLD response related to choice prediction error was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention. (http://www.vislab.ucl.ac.uk/Cogent/index.html).For further analysis, the investigators calculated the average rating across the total 12.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jens C Bruening, MD, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research
  • Principal Investigator: Dana M Small, PhD, Yale University
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Tittgemeyer, PhD, Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 9, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HF-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behavior, Eating

Clinical Trials on High-Fat/High-Sugar (HF/HS) Diet

3
Subscribe