Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Copeptin Measurement After Mannitol and Hypertonic Saline for the Diagnosis of Polyuria-polydipsia Syndrome (COMPASS)

17 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a new test using mannitol infusion can diagnose the cause of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome as accurately as the current standard test (hypertonic saline infusion) and to compare which test patients prefer. The goal is to identify a simpler and more patient-friendly diagnostic approach.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Recrutamento

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS), characterized by excessive urination and fluid intake, can have different underlying causes, including a deficiency of the hormone vasopressin (AVP-D) or excessive fluid intake without AVP-D (primary polydipsia). Correctly identifying the cause is essential, as the treatments differ and an incorrect diagnosis can negatively impact patient care.

A blood marker called copeptin is used to support the diagnosis, as it reflects vasopressin levels in the body. Currently, the most accurate method involves measuring copeptin after stimulation with hypertonic saline. However, this test is complex, requires close medical monitoring, and can be uncomfortable for patients.

Mannitol is a substance already used in routine clinical care and may offer a simpler way to stimulate copeptin release. Early results suggest that it could provide similar diagnostic accuracy with fewer side effects and better patient comfort.

This study is a randomized, cross-over, multicenter trial in which participants undergo both tests (mannitol and hypertonic saline) in random order. The study compares the diagnostic accuracy and patient preference for both methods, as well as safety and tolerability. In addition, it explores whether other clinical and laboratory measures can further improve the diagnosis of PPS.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

144

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

  • Suíça
      • Basel, Suíça, 4031
        • Recrutamento
        • University Hospital Basel
        • Investigador principal:
          • Mirjam Christ-Crain, Prof. Dr.
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Hypotonic polyuria/polydipsia syndrome defined as polyuria >40ml/kg body weight/24h and polydipsia >3l/24h; and urine osmolality <800mOsm/L or known AVP-D based on accepted criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Polyuria/polydipsia secondary to diabetes mellitus, hypercalcemia, or hypokalemia
  2. Diagnosis of AVP-R (Copeptin > 21.4 pmol/L)
  3. Evidence of acute illness
  4. Epilepsy requiring treatment
  5. Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (blood pressure >160/100mmHg at baseline
  6. eGFR < 60 ml/min/1,73 m2
  7. Cardiac failure (NYHA III-IV)
  8. Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh Class C
  9. Uncorrected adrenal or thyroidal deficiency
  10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  11. Current or unresolved urinary obstruction
  12. Enrollment in a clinical trial within the last 30 days
  13. Patients refusing or unable to give written informed consent
  14. Inability to follow study procedures

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Diagnóstico
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição cruzada
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Mannitol Infusion
Diagnostic evaluation of polyuria polydipsia syndrome through copeptin measurement after mannitol infusion.
Teste de diagnostico: Mannitol
Intravenous infusion of 1.5g/kg body weight (max. 120g) mannitol is given over 30 minutes (≙ 7.5ml/kg body weight).
Comparador Ativo: Hypertonic Saline Infusion (HIS)
Diagnostic evaluation of polyuria polydipsia syndrome through copeptin measurement after HIS
Teste de diagnostico: Hypertonic Saline
Intravenous infusion of NaCl 3% is given first as a bolus of 250ml over 15 minutes, then with an infusion rate of 0.15ml/kg body weight / minute (≙ 9ml/kg body weight/hour).

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Overall Diagnostic Accuracy
Prazo: One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)
The overall diagnostic accuracy is defined as the proportion of correct diagnoses out of all diagnoses based on the stimulated copeptin value. Final diagnosis will be made after termination of the study by two endocrine specialists who will be blinded to the copeptin results of the mannitol infusion.
One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)
Patient Test Preference
Prazo: 1 week after completion of both diagnostic tests
Patient-reported preference between mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion, assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from -2 (strong preference for hypertonic saline) to +2 (strong preference for mannitol).
1 week after completion of both diagnostic tests

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Diagnostic Performance Measures for AVP-D
Prazo: At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion for diagnosing AVP deficiency using predefined copeptin cut-offs.
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Diagnostic Performance Measures for PP
Prazo: At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion for diagnosing PP using predefined copeptin cut-offs.
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Optimal copeptin cut-off after mannitol infusion
Prazo: At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Exploratory determination and validation of optimal copeptin cut-off values for differentiating AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia following mannitol stimulation.
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Frequency and severity of clinical symptoms
Prazo: During each test day (baseline to end of monitoring period 90 minutes/ 240 minutes)
Frequency and severity of symptoms (e.g., thirst, headache, nausea, malaise) assessed using numeric rating scales during mannitol and hypertonic saline tests.
During each test day (baseline to end of monitoring period 90 minutes/ 240 minutes)
Subjective burden of each test assessed by numeric rating scale
Prazo: Immediately after each test day
Patient-reported burden of each diagnostic test assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10).
Immediately after each test day
Psychopathological assessment (STAI-T)
Prazo: Baseline
General anxiety levels is assessed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) questionnaire. The total trait score (STAI-T) ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating more pronounced anxiety.
Baseline
Autistic traits
Prazo: Baseline
Autistic traits is assessed by Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) questionnaire. The AQ consists of 50 items, with four choices for each item from "definitely agree" to "definitely disagree" and a total score from 0 to 50. A score above the proposed cut-off of 29 highlights significant traits of autism.
Baseline
Quality of Life in Posterior Pituitary Disease
Prazo: Baseline and follow-up (10 weeks )
Currently, no disease-specific tool exists to assess treatment success for either desmopressin or oxytocin (OXT) therapy in patients with arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D). To address this gap, we developed a novel multidimensional questionnaire in close collaboration with patients, patient representatives, and patient advocates. The PP-QoL consists of three parts: Part A assesses symptoms related to AVP-D (15 items), while Parts B (17 items) and C (21 items) focus on domains associated with OXT deficiency.
Baseline and follow-up (10 weeks )
Change in oxytocin/neurophysin I levels
Prazo: Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Change in circulating oxytocin and neurophysin I levels before and after each diagnostic test.
Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between psychopathology questionnaires and oxytocin levels
Prazo: Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Correlation between psychopathological questionnaires and oxytocin levels will be described using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between psychopathology questionnaire and neurophysin I levels
Prazo: Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Correlation between psychopathological questionnaires and neurophysin I levels will be described using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Validation of clinical diagnostic score
Prazo: After test day 2 and 10 weeks thereafter
Validation of a predefined diagnostic score using clinical and basal parameters
After test day 2 and 10 weeks thereafter
Change of urinary copeptin levels
Prazo: During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days
Change in urinary copeptin levels before and after mannitol and hypertonic saline stimulation.
During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days
Optimal urinary copeptin cut-offs
Prazo: 10 weeks after test day 2
Exploratory determination of optimal urinary copeptin thresholds for differential diagnosis.
10 weeks after test day 2
Sex-specific copeptin response
Prazo: During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days and at study completion
Evaluation of sex-specific differences in stimulated copeptin levels and corresponding diagnostic cut-offs.
During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days and at study completion
Cost-efficiency of diagnostic tests
Prazo: One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)
Exploratory assessment of healthcare costs associated with mannitol infusion versus hypertonic saline infusion.
One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Investigadores

  • Cadeira de estudo: Mirjam Christ-Crain, Prof. Dr., University Hospital of Basel

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

16 de junho de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2030

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2030

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

30 de março de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

4 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

6 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

18 de junho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

17 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2026-00480;kt25ChristCrain7

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever