Copeptin Measurement After Mannitol and Hypertonic Saline for the Diagnosis of Polyuria-polydipsia Syndrome (COMPASS)

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a new test using mannitol infusion can diagnose the cause of polyuria-polydipsia syndrome as accurately as the current standard test (hypertonic saline infusion) and to compare which test patients prefer. The goal is to identify a simpler and more patient-friendly diagnostic approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Polyuria-polydipsia syndrome (PPS), characterized by excessive urination and fluid intake, can have different underlying causes, including a deficiency of the hormone vasopressin (AVP-D) or excessive fluid intake without AVP-D (primary polydipsia). Correctly identifying the cause is essential, as the treatments differ and an incorrect diagnosis can negatively impact patient care.

A blood marker called copeptin is used to support the diagnosis, as it reflects vasopressin levels in the body. Currently, the most accurate method involves measuring copeptin after stimulation with hypertonic saline. However, this test is complex, requires close medical monitoring, and can be uncomfortable for patients.

Mannitol is a substance already used in routine clinical care and may offer a simpler way to stimulate copeptin release. Early results suggest that it could provide similar diagnostic accuracy with fewer side effects and better patient comfort.

This study is a randomized, cross-over, multicenter trial in which participants undergo both tests (mannitol and hypertonic saline) in random order. The study compares the diagnostic accuracy and patient preference for both methods, as well as safety and tolerability. In addition, it explores whether other clinical and laboratory measures can further improve the diagnosis of PPS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Hypotonic polyuria/polydipsia syndrome defined as polyuria >40ml/kg body weight/24h and polydipsia >3l/24h; and urine osmolality <800mOsm/L or known AVP-D based on accepted criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Polyuria/polydipsia secondary to diabetes mellitus, hypercalcemia, or hypokalemia
  2. Diagnosis of AVP-R (Copeptin > 21.4 pmol/L)
  3. Evidence of acute illness
  4. Epilepsy requiring treatment
  5. Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (blood pressure >160/100mmHg at baseline
  6. eGFR < 60 ml/min/1,73 m2
  7. Cardiac failure (NYHA III-IV)
  8. Diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, Child-Pugh Class C
  9. Uncorrected adrenal or thyroidal deficiency
  10. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  11. Current or unresolved urinary obstruction
  12. Enrollment in a clinical trial within the last 30 days
  13. Patients refusing or unable to give written informed consent
  14. Inability to follow study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mannitol Infusion
Diagnostic evaluation of polyuria polydipsia syndrome through copeptin measurement after mannitol infusion.
Intravenous infusion of 1.5g/kg body weight (max. 120g) mannitol is given over 30 minutes (≙ 7.5ml/kg body weight).
Active Comparator: Hypertonic Saline Infusion (HIS)
Diagnostic evaluation of polyuria polydipsia syndrome through copeptin measurement after HIS
Intravenous infusion of NaCl 3% is given first as a bolus of 250ml over 15 minutes, then with an infusion rate of 0.15ml/kg body weight / minute (≙ 9ml/kg body weight/hour).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Diagnostic Accuracy
Time Frame: One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)
The overall diagnostic accuracy is defined as the proportion of correct diagnoses out of all diagnoses based on the stimulated copeptin value. Final diagnosis will be made after termination of the study by two endocrine specialists who will be blinded to the copeptin results of the mannitol infusion.
One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)
Patient Test Preference
Time Frame: 1 week after completion of both diagnostic tests
Patient-reported preference between mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion, assessed using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from -2 (strong preference for hypertonic saline) to +2 (strong preference for mannitol).
1 week after completion of both diagnostic tests

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Performance Measures for AVP-D
Time Frame: At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion for diagnosing AVP deficiency using predefined copeptin cut-offs.
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Diagnostic Performance Measures for PP
Time Frame: At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of mannitol infusion and hypertonic saline infusion for diagnosing PP using predefined copeptin cut-offs.
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Optimal copeptin cut-off after mannitol infusion
Time Frame: At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Exploratory determination and validation of optimal copeptin cut-off values for differentiating AVP deficiency from primary polydipsia following mannitol stimulation.
At completion of follow-up, 10 weeks after last diagnostic test
Frequency and severity of clinical symptoms
Time Frame: During each test day (baseline to end of monitoring period 90 minutes/ 240 minutes)
Frequency and severity of symptoms (e.g., thirst, headache, nausea, malaise) assessed using numeric rating scales during mannitol and hypertonic saline tests.
During each test day (baseline to end of monitoring period 90 minutes/ 240 minutes)
Subjective burden of each test assessed by numeric rating scale
Time Frame: Immediately after each test day
Patient-reported burden of each diagnostic test assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10).
Immediately after each test day
Psychopathological assessment (STAI-T)
Time Frame: Baseline
General anxiety levels is assessed by State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) questionnaire. The total trait score (STAI-T) ranges from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating more pronounced anxiety.
Baseline
Autistic traits
Time Frame: Baseline
Autistic traits is assessed by Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) questionnaire. The AQ consists of 50 items, with four choices for each item from "definitely agree" to "definitely disagree" and a total score from 0 to 50. A score above the proposed cut-off of 29 highlights significant traits of autism.
Baseline
Quality of Life in Posterior Pituitary Disease
Time Frame: Baseline and follow-up (10 weeks )
Currently, no disease-specific tool exists to assess treatment success for either desmopressin or oxytocin (OXT) therapy in patients with arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D). To address this gap, we developed a novel multidimensional questionnaire in close collaboration with patients, patient representatives, and patient advocates. The PP-QoL consists of three parts: Part A assesses symptoms related to AVP-D (15 items), while Parts B (17 items) and C (21 items) focus on domains associated with OXT deficiency.
Baseline and follow-up (10 weeks )
Change in oxytocin/neurophysin I levels
Time Frame: Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Change in circulating oxytocin and neurophysin I levels before and after each diagnostic test.
Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between psychopathology questionnaires and oxytocin levels
Time Frame: Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Correlation between psychopathological questionnaires and oxytocin levels will be described using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between psychopathology questionnaire and neurophysin I levels
Time Frame: Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Correlation between psychopathological questionnaires and neurophysin I levels will be described using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.
Baseline and 90 minutes post-stimulation
Validation of clinical diagnostic score
Time Frame: After test day 2 and 10 weeks thereafter
Validation of a predefined diagnostic score using clinical and basal parameters
After test day 2 and 10 weeks thereafter
Change of urinary copeptin levels
Time Frame: During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days
Change in urinary copeptin levels before and after mannitol and hypertonic saline stimulation.
During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days
Optimal urinary copeptin cut-offs
Time Frame: 10 weeks after test day 2
Exploratory determination of optimal urinary copeptin thresholds for differential diagnosis.
10 weeks after test day 2
Sex-specific copeptin response
Time Frame: During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days and at study completion
Evaluation of sex-specific differences in stimulated copeptin levels and corresponding diagnostic cut-offs.
During test day 1 and test day 2 with a maximum of 3 month in between the two test days and at study completion
Cost-efficiency of diagnostic tests
Time Frame: One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)
Exploratory assessment of healthcare costs associated with mannitol infusion versus hypertonic saline infusion.
One time assessment at Follow up Visit 2 (10 weeks after baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mirjam Christ-Crain, Prof. Dr., University Hospital of Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Polydipsia

Clinical Trials on Mannitol

Subscribe