Individualized PEEP and Pulmonary Complications in On-Pump CABG
Effect of Individualized PEEP Guided by Driving Pressure and Mechanical Power on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in On-Pump CABG: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after major surgery and are frequently observed in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These complications are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality (1,2).
Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies have traditionally focused on individual parameters such as low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, and driving pressure. However, the effects of these parameters on postoperative pulmonary outcomes in cardiac surgery patients remain unclear. In particular, PEEP- and driving pressure-guided approaches are controversial in terms of feasibility and safety in patients undergoing CPB, who may be hemodynamically vulnerable.
Mechanical power is a comprehensive parameter that reflects the total energy delivered to the respiratory system per unit of time by integrating ventilatory variables such as tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. Therefore, mechanical power may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanical load applied to the lungs compared with individual ventilatory parameters. Previous studies have reported that higher mechanical power values may be associated with lung injury, postoperative pulmonary complications, and mortality (3).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of monitoring mechanical power during perioperative mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study hypothesis is that a mechanical power-based ventilation approach may reduce the incidence of PPCs compared with strategies based on conventional ventilation parameters.
Обзор исследования
Статус
Подробное описание
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after major surgery and are frequently observed in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These complications are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality (1,2).
Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies have traditionally focused on individual parameters such as low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, and driving pressure. However, the effects of these parameters on postoperative pulmonary outcomes in cardiac surgery patients remain unclear. In particular, PEEP- and driving pressure-guided approaches are controversial in terms of feasibility and safety in patients undergoing CPB, who may be hemodynamically vulnerable.
Mechanical power is a comprehensive parameter that reflects the total energy delivered to the respiratory system per unit of time by integrating ventilatory variables such as tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. Therefore, mechanical power may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanical load applied to the lungs compared with individual ventilatory parameters. Previous studies have reported that higher mechanical power values may be associated with lung injury, postoperative pulmonary complications, and mortality (3).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of monitoring mechanical power during perioperative mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study hypothesis is that a mechanical power-based ventilation approach may reduce the incidence of PPCs compared with strategies based on conventional ventilation parameters.
Тип исследования
Регистрация (Оцененный)
Фаза
- Непригодный
Контакты и местонахождение
Контакты исследования
- Имя: eralp cevikkalp
- Номер телефона: 905054554875
- Электронная почта: eralpcevikkalp@hotmail.com
Учебное резервное копирование контактов
- Имя: İrem Aydoğmuş
- Электронная почта: driremaydogmus@hotmail.com
Места учебы
-
-
nilüfer
-
Bursa, nilüfer, Турция (Туркие), 16000
- Bursa City Hospital
-
Контакт:
- eralp cevikkalp
- Номер телефона: 905054554875
- Электронная почта: eralpcevikkalp@hotmail.com
-
-
Критерии участия
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
- Взрослый
- Пожилой взрослый
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Описание
Patients with ASA physical status II-III who are scheduled to undergo elective open-heart surgery via on-pump median sternotomy will be included in the study.
Patients scheduled for emergency surgery, those planned to undergo off-pump cardiac surgery, patients with a history of myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, patients with advanced COPD, patients with an ARISCAT score of 44 or higher, patients with a BMI of 35 kg/m² or higher, patients with NYHA class IV status, patients receiving preoperative immunotherapy, and patients with severe hepatic or renal failure will be excluded from the study.
Учебный план
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Уход
- Распределение: Рандомизированный
- Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
- Маскировка: Тройной
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Экспериментальный: Mechanical Power Group
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP group
|
After hemodynamic stability is achieved, the ventilator will be switched to volume-controlled mode with 6 ml/kg tidal volume , and a recruitment maneuver will be performed by gradually increasing PEEP to 20 cmH₂O. Subsequently, during the decremental PEEP trial, PEEP will be reduced by 2 cmH₂O every 20 seconds down to 6 cmH₂O, and ΔP (Pplat-PEEP) will be calculated at each step. The PEEP level associated with the lowest ΔP on the ΔP-PEEP curve will be identified, a second recruitment maneuver will be performed, and PEEP will then be fixed at this level. Before sternotomy, the minimum PEEP value that provides the lowest driving pressure will be determined, and this value will be maintained throughout the perioperative period, except during cardiopulmonary bypass. |
|
Другой: Lung Protective Ventilation
Conventional lung-protective ventilation group
|
In volume-controlled mechanical ventilation, tidal volume will be set at 6 mL/kg and PEEP will be fixed at 5 cmH₂O.
Ventilation will be maintained with these settings throughout the perioperative period, except during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Mechanical power values will also be calculated and recorded during all these periods.
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
postoperative pulmonary complications
Временное ограничение: postoperative day 1,3,7
|
Postoperative pulmonary complications, including atelectasis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and bronchospasm, will be assessed according to the EPCO(European Perioperative Clinical Outcome) criteria.
|
postoperative day 1,3,7
|
Вторичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Inflammatory markers
Временное ограничение: Postoperative 1., 24, 48,72 hour and day 7
|
Postoperative biochemical markers, including CRP, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, procalcitonin, white blood cell count, IL-6, and TNF-α, will be evaluated.
|
Postoperative 1., 24, 48,72 hour and day 7
|
|
İCU lenght of stay
Временное ограничение: From postoperative ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
Duration of İCU lenght of stay
|
From postoperative ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Временное ограничение: Time from intubation to successfull extubation
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
|
Time from intubation to successfull extubation
|
|
30 day mortality
Временное ограничение: postoperative 30 day mortality
|
30 day mortality
|
postoperative 30 day mortality
|
|
Hospital lenght of stay
Временное ограничение: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
Hospital lenght of stay
|
From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Спонсор
Следователи
- Учебный стул: eralp cevikkalp, Burs City Hospital
Публикации и полезные ссылки
Общие публикации
- 1. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data Neto, Ary Serpa et al. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Volume 4, Issue 4, 272 - 280 2. Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. 3. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12. PMID: 27620287. 4. Li XF, Jiang RJ, Mao WJ, Yu H, Xin J, Yu H. The effect of driving pressure-guided versus conventional mechanical ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111150. Epub 2023 Jun 10. PMID: 37307653.
Даты записи исследования
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования (Оцененный)
Первичное завершение (Оцененный)
Завершение исследования (Оцененный)
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
Первый опубликованный (Действительный)
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
Последняя проверка
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- 25.03.2026 2026-6/7
- 26-AKD-57 (Другой идентификатор: Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health, Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency)
Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)
Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?
Описание плана IPD
Информация о лекарствах и устройствах, исследовательские документы
Изучает лекарственный продукт, регулируемый FDA США.
Изучает продукт устройства, регулируемый Управлением по санитарному надзору за качеством пищевых продуктов и медикаментов США.
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .