Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Individualized PEEP and Pulmonary Complications in On-Pump CABG

1 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: eralp çevikkalp, Bursa City Hospital

Effect of Individualized PEEP Guided by Driving Pressure and Mechanical Power on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in On-Pump CABG: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after major surgery and are frequently observed in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These complications are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality (1,2).

Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies have traditionally focused on individual parameters such as low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, and driving pressure. However, the effects of these parameters on postoperative pulmonary outcomes in cardiac surgery patients remain unclear. In particular, PEEP- and driving pressure-guided approaches are controversial in terms of feasibility and safety in patients undergoing CPB, who may be hemodynamically vulnerable.

Mechanical power is a comprehensive parameter that reflects the total energy delivered to the respiratory system per unit of time by integrating ventilatory variables such as tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. Therefore, mechanical power may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanical load applied to the lungs compared with individual ventilatory parameters. Previous studies have reported that higher mechanical power values may be associated with lung injury, postoperative pulmonary complications, and mortality (3).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of monitoring mechanical power during perioperative mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study hypothesis is that a mechanical power-based ventilation approach may reduce the incidence of PPCs compared with strategies based on conventional ventilation parameters.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after major surgery and are frequently observed in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These complications are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality (1,2).

Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies have traditionally focused on individual parameters such as low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, and driving pressure. However, the effects of these parameters on postoperative pulmonary outcomes in cardiac surgery patients remain unclear. In particular, PEEP- and driving pressure-guided approaches are controversial in terms of feasibility and safety in patients undergoing CPB, who may be hemodynamically vulnerable.

Mechanical power is a comprehensive parameter that reflects the total energy delivered to the respiratory system per unit of time by integrating ventilatory variables such as tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. Therefore, mechanical power may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanical load applied to the lungs compared with individual ventilatory parameters. Previous studies have reported that higher mechanical power values may be associated with lung injury, postoperative pulmonary complications, and mortality (3).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of monitoring mechanical power during perioperative mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study hypothesis is that a mechanical power-based ventilation approach may reduce the incidence of PPCs compared with strategies based on conventional ventilation parameters.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

80

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Patients with ASA physical status II-III who are scheduled to undergo elective open-heart surgery via on-pump median sternotomy will be included in the study.

Patients scheduled for emergency surgery, those planned to undergo off-pump cardiac surgery, patients with a history of myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, patients with advanced COPD, patients with an ARISCAT score of 44 or higher, patients with a BMI of 35 kg/m² or higher, patients with NYHA class IV status, patients receiving preoperative immunotherapy, and patients with severe hepatic or renal failure will be excluded from the study.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Triplicare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Mechanical Power Group
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP group
Altro: Driving pressure-based personalized PEEP strategy

After hemodynamic stability is achieved, the ventilator will be switched to volume-controlled mode with 6 ml/kg tidal volume , and a recruitment maneuver will be performed by gradually increasing PEEP to 20 cmH₂O. Subsequently, during the decremental PEEP trial, PEEP will be reduced by 2 cmH₂O every 20 seconds down to 6 cmH₂O, and ΔP (Pplat-PEEP) will be calculated at each step.

The PEEP level associated with the lowest ΔP on the ΔP-PEEP curve will be identified, a second recruitment maneuver will be performed, and PEEP will then be fixed at this level. Before sternotomy, the minimum PEEP value that provides the lowest driving pressure will be determined, and this value will be maintained throughout the perioperative period, except during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Altro: Lung Protective Ventilation
Conventional lung-protective ventilation group
Altro: Conventional lung protective mechanical ventilation strategy
In volume-controlled mechanical ventilation, tidal volume will be set at 6 mL/kg and PEEP will be fixed at 5 cmH₂O. Ventilation will be maintained with these settings throughout the perioperative period, except during cardiopulmonary bypass. Mechanical power values will also be calculated and recorded during all these periods.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
postoperative pulmonary complications
Lasso di tempo: postoperative day 1,3,7
Postoperative pulmonary complications, including atelectasis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and bronchospasm, will be assessed according to the EPCO(European Perioperative Clinical Outcome) criteria.
postoperative day 1,3,7

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Inflammatory markers
Lasso di tempo: Postoperative 1., 24, 48,72 hour and day 7
Postoperative biochemical markers, including CRP, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, procalcitonin, white blood cell count, IL-6, and TNF-α, will be evaluated.
Postoperative 1., 24, 48,72 hour and day 7
İCU lenght of stay
Lasso di tempo: From postoperative ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Duration of İCU lenght of stay
From postoperative ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Lasso di tempo: Time from intubation to successfull extubation
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time from intubation to successfull extubation
30 day mortality
Lasso di tempo: postoperative 30 day mortality
30 day mortality
postoperative 30 day mortality
Hospital lenght of stay
Lasso di tempo: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Hospital lenght of stay
From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Bursa City Hospital

Investigatori

  • Cattedra di studio: eralp cevikkalp, Burs City Hospital

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

  • 1. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data Neto, Ary Serpa et al. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Volume 4, Issue 4, 272 - 280 2. Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. 3. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12. PMID: 27620287. 4. Li XF, Jiang RJ, Mao WJ, Yu H, Xin J, Yu H. The effect of driving pressure-guided versus conventional mechanical ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111150. Epub 2023 Jun 10. PMID: 37307653.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

15 maggio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

15 giugno 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

15 luglio 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

18 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

1 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

3 giugno 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

3 giugno 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

1 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 25.03.2026 2026-6/7
  • 26-AKD-57 (Altro identificatore: Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health, Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared because of ethical and institutional restrictions related to patient confidentiality.

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Chirurgia cardiaca

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in Croatia

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

Sottoscrivi