Individualized PEEP and Pulmonary Complications in On-Pump CABG
Effect of Individualized PEEP Guided by Driving Pressure and Mechanical Power on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in On-Pump CABG: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after major surgery and are frequently observed in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These complications are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality (1,2).
Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies have traditionally focused on individual parameters such as low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, and driving pressure. However, the effects of these parameters on postoperative pulmonary outcomes in cardiac surgery patients remain unclear. In particular, PEEP- and driving pressure-guided approaches are controversial in terms of feasibility and safety in patients undergoing CPB, who may be hemodynamically vulnerable.
Mechanical power is a comprehensive parameter that reflects the total energy delivered to the respiratory system per unit of time by integrating ventilatory variables such as tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. Therefore, mechanical power may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanical load applied to the lungs compared with individual ventilatory parameters. Previous studies have reported that higher mechanical power values may be associated with lung injury, postoperative pulmonary complications, and mortality (3).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of monitoring mechanical power during perioperative mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study hypothesis is that a mechanical power-based ventilation approach may reduce the incidence of PPCs compared with strategies based on conventional ventilation parameters.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Descrição detalhada
Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality after major surgery and are frequently observed in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These complications are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer intensive care unit and hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and higher mortality (1,2).
Intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies have traditionally focused on individual parameters such as low tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure, and driving pressure. However, the effects of these parameters on postoperative pulmonary outcomes in cardiac surgery patients remain unclear. In particular, PEEP- and driving pressure-guided approaches are controversial in terms of feasibility and safety in patients undergoing CPB, who may be hemodynamically vulnerable.
Mechanical power is a comprehensive parameter that reflects the total energy delivered to the respiratory system per unit of time by integrating ventilatory variables such as tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and flow. Therefore, mechanical power may provide a more comprehensive assessment of the mechanical load applied to the lungs compared with individual ventilatory parameters. Previous studies have reported that higher mechanical power values may be associated with lung injury, postoperative pulmonary complications, and mortality (3).
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of monitoring mechanical power during perioperative mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study hypothesis is that a mechanical power-based ventilation approach may reduce the incidence of PPCs compared with strategies based on conventional ventilation parameters.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: eralp cevikkalp
- Número de telefone: 905054554875
- E-mail: eralpcevikkalp@hotmail.com
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: İrem Aydoğmuş
- E-mail: driremaydogmus@hotmail.com
Locais de estudo
-
-
nilüfer
-
Bursa, nilüfer, Turquia (Türkiye), 16000
- Bursa City Hospital
-
Contato:
- eralp cevikkalp
- Número de telefone: 905054554875
- E-mail: eralpcevikkalp@hotmail.com
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Patients with ASA physical status II-III who are scheduled to undergo elective open-heart surgery via on-pump median sternotomy will be included in the study.
Patients scheduled for emergency surgery, those planned to undergo off-pump cardiac surgery, patients with a history of myocardial infarction within the last 3 months, patients with advanced COPD, patients with an ARISCAT score of 44 or higher, patients with a BMI of 35 kg/m² or higher, patients with NYHA class IV status, patients receiving preoperative immunotherapy, and patients with severe hepatic or renal failure will be excluded from the study.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Triplo
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mechanical Power Group
Driving pressure-guided individualized PEEP group
|
After hemodynamic stability is achieved, the ventilator will be switched to volume-controlled mode with 6 ml/kg tidal volume , and a recruitment maneuver will be performed by gradually increasing PEEP to 20 cmH₂O. Subsequently, during the decremental PEEP trial, PEEP will be reduced by 2 cmH₂O every 20 seconds down to 6 cmH₂O, and ΔP (Pplat-PEEP) will be calculated at each step. The PEEP level associated with the lowest ΔP on the ΔP-PEEP curve will be identified, a second recruitment maneuver will be performed, and PEEP will then be fixed at this level. Before sternotomy, the minimum PEEP value that provides the lowest driving pressure will be determined, and this value will be maintained throughout the perioperative period, except during cardiopulmonary bypass. |
|
Outro: Lung Protective Ventilation
Conventional lung-protective ventilation group
|
In volume-controlled mechanical ventilation, tidal volume will be set at 6 mL/kg and PEEP will be fixed at 5 cmH₂O.
Ventilation will be maintained with these settings throughout the perioperative period, except during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Mechanical power values will also be calculated and recorded during all these periods.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
postoperative pulmonary complications
Prazo: postoperative day 1,3,7
|
Postoperative pulmonary complications, including atelectasis, pneumonia, respiratory failure, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, and bronchospasm, will be assessed according to the EPCO(European Perioperative Clinical Outcome) criteria.
|
postoperative day 1,3,7
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Inflammatory markers
Prazo: Postoperative 1., 24, 48,72 hour and day 7
|
Postoperative biochemical markers, including CRP, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, procalcitonin, white blood cell count, IL-6, and TNF-α, will be evaluated.
|
Postoperative 1., 24, 48,72 hour and day 7
|
|
İCU lenght of stay
Prazo: From postoperative ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
Duration of İCU lenght of stay
|
From postoperative ICU admission to ICU discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Prazo: Time from intubation to successfull extubation
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
|
Time from intubation to successfull extubation
|
|
30 day mortality
Prazo: postoperative 30 day mortality
|
30 day mortality
|
postoperative 30 day mortality
|
|
Hospital lenght of stay
Prazo: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
Hospital lenght of stay
|
From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Cadeira de estudo: eralp cevikkalp, Burs City Hospital
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- 1. Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data Neto, Ary Serpa et al. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Volume 4, Issue 4, 272 - 280 2. Jammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. 3. Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12. PMID: 27620287. 4. Li XF, Jiang RJ, Mao WJ, Yu H, Xin J, Yu H. The effect of driving pressure-guided versus conventional mechanical ventilation strategy on pulmonary complications following on-pump cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2023 Oct;89:111150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111150. Epub 2023 Jun 10. PMID: 37307653.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 25.03.2026 2026-6/7
- 26-AKD-57 (Outro identificador: Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Health, Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .
Ensaios clínicos em Cirurgia cardíaca
-
Assiut UniversityAinda não está recrutandoCardiac CT TOF