Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

Secondary Haplo HSCT for Relapse After Initial Allogeneic HSCT

2 maj 2018 uppdaterad av: University Hospital Tuebingen

Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in the Treatment of Relapse After a First Allogeneic HSCT: a Retrospective Cohort Study by the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group

Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of natural killer (NK)-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Detaljerad beskrivning

Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative HLA identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of NK-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2. We will describe and quantify the specific patient, donor, treatment, graft and outcomes characteristics associated with the course of treatment. To assess and control for the bias that is associated with the retrospective nature of this study, we will emphasize to collect clearly stated reasons for the decision to use a haploidentical transplant, e.g. as opposed to drug therapy or a second transplant from the original or an alternative HLA identical donor. This is a retrospective observational cohort study. German centers performing allogeneic HSCT are asked to contribute. Data will be validated and missing information will be further retrieved by the four principal investigators through phone. Final follow up will be performed in April 2014, 2014. To be able to supply durable data on the primary endpoints, only patients receiving a haploidentical HSCT2 between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013 will be included.

Studietyp

Observationell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

60

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

18 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Testmetod

Icke-sannolikhetsprov

Studera befolkning

Patients receiving salvage secondary haploidentical allogeneic HSCT after failure of primary allogeneic HSCT

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years at time of HSCT2
  • Malignant hematologic disease
  • Informed consent signed by the patients on the use of data in registry analyses
  • 1st allogeneic HSCT performed from any donor, including haploidentical HSCT1
  • Hematological or extramedullary relapse after HSCT1
  • Haploidentical 2nd allogeneic HSCT (i.e. >= 2 Antigen mismatch family donor) between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013

Third or higher allogeneic HSCT does not preclude analysis as long as HSCT2 was haploidentical.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Treatment related mortality (TRM) of haploidentical HSCT2
Tidsram: up to day 365
up to day 365
Toxicity of haploidentical HSCT2
Tidsram: up to day 365
NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4
up to day 365

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Tidsram
complete remission (CR) rate after haploidentical HSCT2
Tidsram: day 100
day 100
Overall survival (OS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2
Tidsram: 2 years
2 years
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical HSCT2
Tidsram: 2 years
2 years
Incidence of rejection after haploidentical HSCT2
Tidsram: 1 year
1 year
Disease free survival (DFS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2
Tidsram: 2 years
2 years

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Utredare

  • Huvudutredare: Wolfgang A Bethge, MD, University Hospital Tuebingen
  • Huvudutredare: Christoph Schmid, MD, University Hospital Augsburg
  • Huvudutredare: Johanna Tischer, MD, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital Munich
  • Huvudutredare: Maximilian Christopeit, MD, University Hospital of Halle

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart (Faktisk)

1 oktober 2013

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

30 december 2017

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

30 december 2017

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

29 oktober 2013

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

27 november 2013

Första postat (Uppskatta)

28 november 2013

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

3 maj 2018

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

2 maj 2018

Senast verifierad

1 maj 2018

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera