Secondary Haplo HSCT for Relapse After Initial Allogeneic HSCT

May 2, 2018 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

Haploidentical Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) in the Treatment of Relapse After a First Allogeneic HSCT: a Retrospective Cohort Study by the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group

Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of natural killer (NK)-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Relapse of underlying hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently treated by a second allogeneic HSCT (HSCT2). Choosing an alternative donor is often advocated to maximize chances of a graft versus tumour (GVT) effect. We and others published that success of this strategy when using an alternative HLA identical donor is limited, at least when acute leukemia is the underlying disease. The aggressivity of the rapidly proliferating leukemia seems to prevail over GVT effects. A more potent alloimmune response is observed following haploidentical HSCT, especially early after haploidentical HSCT. This might be related to a fast and large expansion of NK-cells. Their alloreactive effect might translate into higher rates of tumor control. On the other hand, non-relapse complications (treatment related mortality, TRM) might be high in advanced relapsed tumour patients with heavy pretreatment and due to delayed immune reconstitution after haploidentical HSCT. The use of a haploidentical donor for HSCT2 following a first allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical donor has been so far only systematically evaluated in small retrospective single center reports. Thus, in this multicenter study we aim to collect data on the extent to which participating centers employ haploidentical transplantation in the situation of relapse after HSCT2. We will describe and quantify the specific patient, donor, treatment, graft and outcomes characteristics associated with the course of treatment. To assess and control for the bias that is associated with the retrospective nature of this study, we will emphasize to collect clearly stated reasons for the decision to use a haploidentical transplant, e.g. as opposed to drug therapy or a second transplant from the original or an alternative HLA identical donor. This is a retrospective observational cohort study. German centers performing allogeneic HSCT are asked to contribute. Data will be validated and missing information will be further retrieved by the four principal investigators through phone. Final follow up will be performed in April 2014, 2014. To be able to supply durable data on the primary endpoints, only patients receiving a haploidentical HSCT2 between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013 will be included.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients receiving salvage secondary haploidentical allogeneic HSCT after failure of primary allogeneic HSCT

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years at time of HSCT2
  • Malignant hematologic disease
  • Informed consent signed by the patients on the use of data in registry analyses
  • 1st allogeneic HSCT performed from any donor, including haploidentical HSCT1
  • Hematological or extramedullary relapse after HSCT1
  • Haploidentical 2nd allogeneic HSCT (i.e. >= 2 Antigen mismatch family donor) between 01.07.2003 and 30.06.2013

Third or higher allogeneic HSCT does not preclude analysis as long as HSCT2 was haploidentical.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment related mortality (TRM) of haploidentical HSCT2
Time Frame: up to day 365
up to day 365
Toxicity of haploidentical HSCT2
Time Frame: up to day 365
NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4
up to day 365

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
complete remission (CR) rate after haploidentical HSCT2
Time Frame: day 100
day 100
Overall survival (OS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical HSCT2
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Incidence of rejection after haploidentical HSCT2
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Disease free survival (DFS) at 2 years after haploidentical HSCT2
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wolfgang A Bethge, MD, University Hospital Tuebingen
  • Principal Investigator: Christoph Schmid, MD, University Hospital Augsburg
  • Principal Investigator: Johanna Tischer, MD, Ludwig-Maximilians University Hospital Munich
  • Principal Investigator: Maximilian Christopeit, MD, University Hospital of Halle

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relapse of Hematological Malignancies

3
Subscribe