此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Clinical Investigation of Mandibular Implant Overdenture

2012年2月21日 更新者:Virginia Commonwealth University
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three variable dental implant attachment methodologies in conjunction with lower dental-implant retained/supported complete overdenture treatment. These three methods are all presently used by dental practitioners, but vary significantly in terms of added treatment cost and complexity. The study tests the hypothesis that the least complex and costly method provides an equivalent treatment outcome to other more complex and costly methods.

研究概览

地位

完全的

条件

详细说明

This project utilizes 30 subjects in a prospective, randomly assigned clinical study that uses a four-period, six sequence, three treatment crossover design to test the hypothesis that defined outcomes of variable implant overdenture treatments are equivalent. The project tests three overdenture treatment modalities, (1) four-implant, bar/clip-attached treatment, (2) two-implant, bar/clip-attached treatment, and (3) two-implant independently attached (O-ring) treatment. Each subject has four dental implants placed into the anterior mandible and new dentures are fabricated. After successful implant integration, subjects are randomly assigned to one of six sequences of treatment. Each treatment is followed for data collection for at least twelve months before the mandibular denture is modified to incorporate the next treatment in the sequence. Equivalence is measured in terms of prosthesis retention, stability, supporting and peri-implant tissue response, patient satisfaction/preference and treatment complications/failures.

Information from this study will assist dental practitioners during treatment planning in selecting appropriate and cost effective treatment choices. There is an inverse relationship between edentulism in the U.S. population and socioeconomic status. If less costly and simplified treatment methods are shown to provide an equivalent treatment outcome to more costly/complex methods, these simplified treatments can be used to treat a larger percentage of the edentulous population.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

30

阶段

  • 阶段2

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Virginia
      • Richmond,、Virginia、美国、23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

21年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion:

  • Adult patient;
  • Male or female;
  • At least one year of previous conventional complete denture treatment history;
  • Willing to accept the conditions of the study and informed consent freely given;
  • Ability to participate for 6 years;
  • Able to understand and respond to self-reporting measurement scales used in the study;
  • Minimum 20-mm interarch distance at the estimated vertical dimension of occlusion;
  • Adequate bone quality;
  • Adequate bone quantity to accommodate minimally four 3.75-mm diameter by 7-mm long Brånemark implants.

Exclusion:

  • Administrative or physical considerations which would seriously affect the surgical procedure or construe a hindrance for a six-year involvement;
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse;
  • Excessive smoking (1+ pack/day);
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease;
  • Inability to undergo minor oral surgery because of health or personal reasons;
  • Irradiated surgical site;
  • Unrealistic expectations of the prosthodontic treatment outcome;
  • Psychological or psychiatric conditions that could influence the subject's reaction to treatment;
  • Acute or chronic TMD problems;
  • pregnancy;
  • Class II jaw relationship;
  • Conventional dental treatment the treatment of choice.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:交叉作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:treatment modalities changed for comparison
All subjects experienced all treatment modalities being studied.
All overdenture treatment modalities were provided to each subject using a crossover design.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
大体时间
Comparison of implant overdenture clinical modalities using clinical measures to compare treatment outcomes
大体时间:6 month and 12 month
6 month and 12 month

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:David R Burns、Virginia Commonwealth University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

1998年11月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2007年1月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2007年1月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2003年8月1日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2003年8月4日

首次发布 (估计)

2003年8月5日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2012年2月22日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2012年2月21日

最后验证

2010年1月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • NIDCR-12204
  • R01DE012204 (美国 NIH 拨款/合同)

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅