Virtual Continuity and Its Impact on Complex Hospitalized Patients' Care
2015年3月27日 更新者:University of Pittsburgh
Communication between physicians caring for a patient in the hospital and that patient's primary care provider is less than optimal, and can lead to diminished health care quality and safety.
This project will lead to better communication between physicians and could decrease medication errors that tend to occur as the patient goes from hospital to home.
研究概览
详细说明
Communication between physicians caring for hospitalized patients and those patients' primary care providers (PCPs) is often suboptimal.
Hospital-based information systems can improve communication by automating information exchange between hospital physicians and PCPs, and perhaps, as a result, improve the quality and safety of health care.
MedTrak, the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) electronic physician communication tool, has proven successful and is poised to move forward with an initiative the investigators call virtual continuity, allowing PCPs to follow their patients electronically if they cannot do so physically.
Virtual continuity will include: emails to PCPs triggered by clinical events with embedded links to electronic medical record data and communication portals, medication lists electronically delivered to PCPs at admission and discharge, and immediate PCP notification of discharge with pertinent clinical details.
To evaluate virtual continuity, the investigators will examine the frequency of discharge medication errors in complex medical patients using a pre-post study design of virtual continuity compared to usual communication.
Medication errors will be ascertained using accepted methods.
The investigators will also investigate differences in rehospitalization, post discharge emergency department visit and PCP follow up rates.
The IT cost of implementing and maintaining the virtual continuity intervention will also be assessed.
Virtual continuity will allow PCPs to participate more directly in the care of their hospitalized patients.
Improved communication could lead to higher-quality patient care and greater patient care safety for hospitalized patients with complex medical problems.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
835
阶段
- 第三阶段
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh、Pennsylvania、美国、15213-2582
- UPMC Presbyterian Hospital
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Are admitted to UPMC Presbyterian General Medicine, Geriatrics, Cardiology, or Surgery inpatient services;
- Are 18 years of age or older;
- Are currently receiving 5 or more medications;
- Have 2 or more comorbid conditions present, defined using the Elixhauser comorbidity system (Med Care 1998;36:8-27 and Med Care. 2005 Nov; 43(11): 1130-9 ). These comorbidities are: congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, valvular disease, pulmonary circulation disorders, peripheral vascular disorders, hypertension, paralysis, other neurologic disorders, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes uncomplicated, diabetes complicated, hypothyroidism, renal failure, liver disease, peptic ulcer disease excluding bleeding, AIDS/HIV disease, lymphoma, metastatic cancer, solid tumor without metastasis, rheumatoid arthritis/collagen vascular diseases, coagulopathy, obesity, weight loss, fluid and electrolyte disorders, blood loss anemia, deficiency anemias, alcohol abuse, drug abuse, psychoses, and depression
- Have a Primary Care Physician who has outpatient data included on EPIC electronic health record.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Are admitted to critical care units;
- Are admitted from skilled nursing facilities;
- Have dementia;
- Were previously enrolled in the study
- Are organ transplant recipients
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:卫生服务研究
- 分配:非随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
无干预:(Usual) MedTrak system of PCP notification
MedTrak, the information system used by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), currently notifies PCPs when patients are admitted and discharged from the hospital.
|
|
|
实验性的:Automated communication tools
An enhanced version of MedTrak (the present system of PCP notification).
Electronic medical record links will be developed and used to allow automated communication with the PCP.
|
Automated communication tools will include:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Medication Errors at Hospital Discharge
大体时间:Approximately 1-30 days
|
Medication name, dose, and frequency of administration for patient pre-admission medications will be recorded.
Medications received during the hospitalization and discharge medications will be obtained by medical record review following hospital discharge.
Pre-admission medications will be compared to discharge medications and differences will be considered discharge medication variances.
Two trained pharmacists will independently review medication variances to determine clinical indications or medication errors.
|
Approximately 1-30 days
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient PCP Visits, Emergency Room Visits and Rehospitalizations Within 30 Days Post-discharge.
大体时间:Within 30 post-discharge from hospital
|
Details regarding patient PCP follow-up office appointments, ER visits and rehospitalizations occuring within 30 days post-discharge will be collected from the EMR.
|
Within 30 post-discharge from hospital
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Kenneth J Smith, MD, MS、University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA. Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2007 Sep;2(5):314-23. doi: 10.1002/jhm.228.
- Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.831.
- Halasyamani L, Kripalani S, Coleman E, Schnipper J, van Walraven C, Nagamine J, Torcson P, Bookwalter T, Budnitz T, Manning D. Transition of care for hospitalized elderly patients--development of a discharge checklist for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2006 Nov;1(6):354-60. doi: 10.1002/jhm.129.
- Coleman EA, Boult C; American Geriatrics Society Health Care Systems Committee. Improving the quality of transitional care for persons with complex care needs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Apr;51(4):556-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51186.x. No abstract available.
- Coleman EA, Mahoney E, Parry C. Assessing the quality of preparation for posthospital care from the patient's perspective: the care transitions measure. Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):246-55. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00007.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2010年8月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2013年1月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2013年1月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2011年7月15日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2011年7月18日
首次发布 (估计)
2011年7月19日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
2015年4月16日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2015年3月27日
最后验证
2015年3月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- 3130920
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.