Antiviral Efficacy of Switching to ETV Plus TDF
A Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Compare Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Switching to ETV Plus TDF Versus Maintaining LAM/LDT Plus ADF Combination in CHC With PVR to LAM/LDF Plus ADF Combination Rescue Therapy for YMDD Mutation
Switching to Entecavir(ETV) plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate(TDF) combination will result in faster and greater antiviral activity and lower rates of resistance emergence over maintaining Lamivudine(LAM)/Telbivudine(LdT)+Adefovir(ADV) combination in partial responders to LAM/LdT+ADV rescue therapy.
Earlier switching to combination with the most potent regimen will be more effective to achieve virologic response(VR) and prevent further resistance emergence.
All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.
研究概览
详细说明
- As TDF has not been approved yet in Korea, current KASL practice guideline generally recommends to add ADV in LAM-resistant or LdT-resistant patients.
- However, several local literatures reported a substantial proportion of patients treated with LAM plus ADV combination therapy showed a persistently inadequate or partial virologic response('VR') and YMDDm still maintained in spite of under rescue combination therapy.
- Due to the unavailability of TDF in Korea, ETV plus ADV combination has being considered a better salvage therapy with non-overlapping cross-resistance profiles in pts who fail to LAM plus ADV rescue therapy and local report demonstrated that the rate of VR was significantly higher with ETV+ADV switching group than LAM+ADV continuation group in partial responder to LAM plus ADV combination rescue therapy for LAM resistance.
- Hence, more earlier combination therapy with the most potent Nucleoside and Nucleotide analogue would be a promising salvage treatment for previous NA treatment failures but comparative prospective trials are limited.
- Therefore, this study will investigate the greater effectiveness and safety of switching to the most potent combination versus maintaining LAM(or LdT) plus ADV and also compare the rate of VR based on the HBV DNA cut-off level at switching - more than and less than 20,000 IU/mL.
All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.
研究类型
注册 (预期的)
阶段
- 第四阶段
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥ 20 years of age
- History of HBsAg positive for more than 6 months
- History of genotypic resistance to LAM or LdT (YMDDm)
- Partial responder (HBV DNA ≥ 60 IU/mL) currently receiving antiviral combination rescue therapy for at least 24 weeks of treatment with LAM+ADV or LdT+ADV
- Hepatitis B e Antigen(HBeAg)-positive and -negative
- Compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh A)
- Signed written informed consent after being instructed about the objective and procedure of the clinical study
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of genotypic resistance to ADV
- Most previous treatment of other than LAM+ADV and LdT+ADV
- Subjects with Alanine Aminotransferase(ALT) > 10xUpper Limit of normal(ULN)
- Co-infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV) or HIV
- Pregnant or lactating woman
- Subject who needs long-term administration of drugs including immunosuppressive agents, agents related to high risk in the hepatic/renal toxicity, agents influencing renal excretion
- History of liver transplantation or planned for liver transplantation
- Subject who was diagnosed malignant tumor and has been receiving chemotherapy
- Subject who has HCC history or who shows potential hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) finding such as suspicious region in the radiologic exam(abdominal US or CT) or serum Alpha Feto Protein(AFP) elevation
- Renal Insufficiency (CLcr < 50ml/min based on Cockcroft-Gault equation considering weight, ages and serum creatinine)
- Subject who has a liver disease other than chronic hepatitis B (e.g. hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency etc.)
- Subject who has a history of hypersensitivity to study drug or its ingredients
- Subject who is involved in other clinical trial within 60 days prior to study entry
- Subject who the investigator deems inappropriate to participate in this study
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:Group A:
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
|
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
其他名称:
|
|
实验性的:Group B
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
|
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
其他名称:
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
The proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) by real-time PCR at Week 48
大体时间:at Week 48
|
To compare the proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with that in maintaining group(Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) by real-time Polymerase chain reaction(PCR) at Week 48
|
at Week 48
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Virologic efficacy
大体时间:Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
To compare virologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
|
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
|
serologic efficacy
大体时间:Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
To compare serologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
|
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
|
biochemical efficacy
大体时间:Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
To compare biochemical response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
|
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
|
Safety issue
大体时间:Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
To compare safety issue in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48 - severity of adverse event
|
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
|
合作者和调查者
合作者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Sang Hoon Ahn, MD, PhD、Yonsei University
出版物和有用的链接
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始
初级完成 (预期的)
研究完成 (预期的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (估计)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.