Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Antiviral Efficacy of Switching to ETV Plus TDF

30 janvier 2014 mis à jour par: Sang Hoon Ahn, Yonsei University

A Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Compare Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Switching to ETV Plus TDF Versus Maintaining LAM/LDT Plus ADF Combination in CHC With PVR to LAM/LDF Plus ADF Combination Rescue Therapy for YMDD Mutation

Switching to Entecavir(ETV) plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate(TDF) combination will result in faster and greater antiviral activity and lower rates of resistance emergence over maintaining Lamivudine(LAM)/Telbivudine(LdT)+Adefovir(ADV) combination in partial responders to LAM/LdT+ADV rescue therapy.

Earlier switching to combination with the most potent regimen will be more effective to achieve virologic response(VR) and prevent further resistance emergence.

All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

  1. As TDF has not been approved yet in Korea, current KASL practice guideline generally recommends to add ADV in LAM-resistant or LdT-resistant patients.
  2. However, several local literatures reported a substantial proportion of patients treated with LAM plus ADV combination therapy showed a persistently inadequate or partial virologic response('VR') and YMDDm still maintained in spite of under rescue combination therapy.
  3. Due to the unavailability of TDF in Korea, ETV plus ADV combination has being considered a better salvage therapy with non-overlapping cross-resistance profiles in pts who fail to LAM plus ADV rescue therapy and local report demonstrated that the rate of VR was significantly higher with ETV+ADV switching group than LAM+ADV continuation group in partial responder to LAM plus ADV combination rescue therapy for LAM resistance.
  4. Hence, more earlier combination therapy with the most potent Nucleoside and Nucleotide analogue would be a promising salvage treatment for previous NA treatment failures but comparative prospective trials are limited.
  5. Therefore, this study will investigate the greater effectiveness and safety of switching to the most potent combination versus maintaining LAM(or LdT) plus ADV and also compare the rate of VR based on the HBV DNA cut-off level at switching - more than and less than 20,000 IU/mL.

All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Anticipé)

104

Phase

  • Phase 4

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

20 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 20 years of age
  2. History of HBsAg positive for more than 6 months
  3. History of genotypic resistance to LAM or LdT (YMDDm)
  4. Partial responder (HBV DNA ≥ 60 IU/mL) currently receiving antiviral combination rescue therapy for at least 24 weeks of treatment with LAM+ADV or LdT+ADV
  5. Hepatitis B e Antigen(HBeAg)-positive and -negative
  6. Compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh A)
  7. Signed written informed consent after being instructed about the objective and procedure of the clinical study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of genotypic resistance to ADV
  2. Most previous treatment of other than LAM+ADV and LdT+ADV
  3. Subjects with Alanine Aminotransferase(ALT) > 10xUpper Limit of normal(ULN)
  4. Co-infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV) or HIV
  5. Pregnant or lactating woman
  6. Subject who needs long-term administration of drugs including immunosuppressive agents, agents related to high risk in the hepatic/renal toxicity, agents influencing renal excretion
  7. History of liver transplantation or planned for liver transplantation
  8. Subject who was diagnosed malignant tumor and has been receiving chemotherapy
  9. Subject who has HCC history or who shows potential hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) finding such as suspicious region in the radiologic exam(abdominal US or CT) or serum Alpha Feto Protein(AFP) elevation
  10. Renal Insufficiency (CLcr < 50ml/min based on Cockcroft-Gault equation considering weight, ages and serum creatinine)
  11. Subject who has a liver disease other than chronic hepatitis B (e.g. hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency etc.)
  12. Subject who has a history of hypersensitivity to study drug or its ingredients
  13. Subject who is involved in other clinical trial within 60 days prior to study entry
  14. Subject who the investigator deems inappropriate to participate in this study

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Group A:
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
Autres noms:
  • Hepsera
  • Sébivo
  • Zeffix
Expérimental: Group B
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
Autres noms:
  • Viread
  • Baraclude

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
The proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) by real-time PCR at Week 48
Délai: at Week 48
To compare the proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with that in maintaining group(Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) by real-time Polymerase chain reaction(PCR) at Week 48
at Week 48

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Virologic efficacy
Délai: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare virologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
serologic efficacy
Délai: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare serologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
biochemical efficacy
Délai: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare biochemical response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
Safety issue
Délai: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare safety issue in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48 - severity of adverse event
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 août 2012

Achèvement primaire (Anticipé)

1 mai 2014

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

1 mai 2014

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

8 mai 2012

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 mai 2012

Première publication (Estimation)

15 mai 2012

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

31 janvier 2014

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

30 janvier 2014

Dernière vérification

1 janvier 2014

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner