Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Antiviral Efficacy of Switching to ETV Plus TDF

30 januari 2014 bijgewerkt door: Sang Hoon Ahn, Yonsei University

A Randomized, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Compare Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Switching to ETV Plus TDF Versus Maintaining LAM/LDT Plus ADF Combination in CHC With PVR to LAM/LDF Plus ADF Combination Rescue Therapy for YMDD Mutation

Switching to Entecavir(ETV) plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate(TDF) combination will result in faster and greater antiviral activity and lower rates of resistance emergence over maintaining Lamivudine(LAM)/Telbivudine(LdT)+Adefovir(ADV) combination in partial responders to LAM/LdT+ADV rescue therapy.

Earlier switching to combination with the most potent regimen will be more effective to achieve virologic response(VR) and prevent further resistance emergence.

All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

  1. As TDF has not been approved yet in Korea, current KASL practice guideline generally recommends to add ADV in LAM-resistant or LdT-resistant patients.
  2. However, several local literatures reported a substantial proportion of patients treated with LAM plus ADV combination therapy showed a persistently inadequate or partial virologic response('VR') and YMDDm still maintained in spite of under rescue combination therapy.
  3. Due to the unavailability of TDF in Korea, ETV plus ADV combination has being considered a better salvage therapy with non-overlapping cross-resistance profiles in pts who fail to LAM plus ADV rescue therapy and local report demonstrated that the rate of VR was significantly higher with ETV+ADV switching group than LAM+ADV continuation group in partial responder to LAM plus ADV combination rescue therapy for LAM resistance.
  4. Hence, more earlier combination therapy with the most potent Nucleoside and Nucleotide analogue would be a promising salvage treatment for previous NA treatment failures but comparative prospective trials are limited.
  5. Therefore, this study will investigate the greater effectiveness and safety of switching to the most potent combination versus maintaining LAM(or LdT) plus ADV and also compare the rate of VR based on the HBV DNA cut-off level at switching - more than and less than 20,000 IU/mL.

All subjects will orally take assigned drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline and every three months thereafter. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests, HBV DNA levels and adverse events. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Verwacht)

104

Fase

  • Fase 4

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

20 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥ 20 years of age
  2. History of HBsAg positive for more than 6 months
  3. History of genotypic resistance to LAM or LdT (YMDDm)
  4. Partial responder (HBV DNA ≥ 60 IU/mL) currently receiving antiviral combination rescue therapy for at least 24 weeks of treatment with LAM+ADV or LdT+ADV
  5. Hepatitis B e Antigen(HBeAg)-positive and -negative
  6. Compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh A)
  7. Signed written informed consent after being instructed about the objective and procedure of the clinical study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of genotypic resistance to ADV
  2. Most previous treatment of other than LAM+ADV and LdT+ADV
  3. Subjects with Alanine Aminotransferase(ALT) > 10xUpper Limit of normal(ULN)
  4. Co-infected with hepatitis C virus(HCV) or HIV
  5. Pregnant or lactating woman
  6. Subject who needs long-term administration of drugs including immunosuppressive agents, agents related to high risk in the hepatic/renal toxicity, agents influencing renal excretion
  7. History of liver transplantation or planned for liver transplantation
  8. Subject who was diagnosed malignant tumor and has been receiving chemotherapy
  9. Subject who has HCC history or who shows potential hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) finding such as suspicious region in the radiologic exam(abdominal US or CT) or serum Alpha Feto Protein(AFP) elevation
  10. Renal Insufficiency (CLcr < 50ml/min based on Cockcroft-Gault equation considering weight, ages and serum creatinine)
  11. Subject who has a liver disease other than chronic hepatitis B (e.g. hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency etc.)
  12. Subject who has a history of hypersensitivity to study drug or its ingredients
  13. Subject who is involved in other clinical trial within 60 days prior to study entry
  14. Subject who the investigator deems inappropriate to participate in this study

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Behandeling
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Actieve vergelijker: Group A:
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
Maintaining LAM/LdT+ADV combination Lamivudine 100mg / Telbivudine 600mg +Adefovir 10mg
Andere namen:
  • Hepsera
  • Sebivo
  • Zeffix
Experimenteel: Group B
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
Switching to ETV plus TDF combination Entecavir 1.0mg + Tenofovir 300mg
Andere namen:
  • Viread
  • Baraclude

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
The proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) by real-time PCR at Week 48
Tijdsspanne: at Week 48
To compare the proportion of subjects who achieve virologic response(HBV DNA < 60 IU/mL, approximately 300 copies/mL) in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with that in maintaining group(Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) by real-time Polymerase chain reaction(PCR) at Week 48
at Week 48

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Virologic efficacy
Tijdsspanne: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare virologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
serologic efficacy
Tijdsspanne: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare serologic response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
biochemical efficacy
Tijdsspanne: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare biochemical response in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
Safety issue
Tijdsspanne: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48
To compare safety issue in switching group(Entecavir plus Tenofovir) with those in maintaining group (Lamivudine/Telbivudine plus Adefovir) at Week 48 - severity of adverse event
Week 12, 24, 36, and 48

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Publicaties en nuttige links

De persoon die verantwoordelijk is voor het invoeren van informatie over het onderzoek stelt deze publicaties vrijwillig ter beschikking. Dit kan gaan over alles wat met het onderzoek te maken heeft.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 augustus 2012

Primaire voltooiing (Verwacht)

1 mei 2014

Studie voltooiing (Verwacht)

1 mei 2014

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

8 mei 2012

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

14 mei 2012

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

15 mei 2012

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)

31 januari 2014

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

30 januari 2014

Laatst geverifieerd

1 januari 2014

Meer informatie

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren