Thrombin Generation Numerical Models Validation in Haemophilic Case
2015年8月12日 更新者:Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Personalized therapy in haemophilia has not been reached yet.
Treatment is substitutive and its doses are only based on the levels of deficient factor VIII (for haemophilia A) or IX (for haemophilia B).
The bleeding severity is not only related to the factor deficiency but also to levels of other coagulation factors (e.g.
factor X, II, AT or TFPI).
It's necessary to take them into account in order to individualize treatments; and Thrombin Generation Assay (TGA) with the CAT method (Calibrated Automated Thrombography) is a good way because it measures the result of the coagulation cascade.
TGA on Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is even closer to physiological conditions than on Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) because platelet influence is represented.
It has already been shown (at least in PPP) that the bleeding tendency in haemophilic patients is usually well correlated to TG.
Some TG parameters are used to characterize the individual coagulation phenotype, the most important being the Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) and the Lag Time (LT).
A hemorrhagic profile usually provides a longer lag time and / or a lower ETP.
However, only few studies tried to determine the influence of each coagulation factor and inhibitor on TG.
They were done on Platelet Poor Plasma (PPP) or on lyophilized plasma.
So the relation between coagulation factors and the different TG parameters remains to be determined, especially in the haemophilic case.
It is possible, experimentally, to find the optimal dose of the factor to be added by measuring TG in samples with different factor VIII or IX concentrations, but this method would be time consuming and expensive, especially because it should be done for each haemophilic patient.
A better way consists in using TG numerical models.
For a set of initial factor levels they simulate the TG and its associated parameters.
It is now essential to validate the existing models, especially in haemophilic cases, in order to see whether they are reliable and can be used in clinical practice afterwards.The objective of this study is to validate thrombin generation numerical models which could predict the factor VIII or IX activity correction to reach a thrombin generation sufficient to avoid bleeding.
A comparison between the TG observed in haemophilic patients and the TG predicted by the models is needed to validate the models.
In order to define a 'safe' TG i.e. sufficient to avoid bleeding, normal ranges of TG parameters have to be measured.
研究概览
研究类型
观察性的
注册 (实际的)
40
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
-
Saint-Etienne、法国、42055
- Chu Saint-Etienne
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 至 45年 (成人)
接受健康志愿者
是的
有资格学习的性别
男性
取样方法
非概率样本
研究人群
volunteers witch work in CHU Saint-Etienne
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed consent form
- Age between 18 and 45 years old
- Male
- no smoker
Exclusion Criteria:
- other clinical research protocol participation during the 3 months before inclusion
- Personal or familial history of hemorrhagic disease (parents, brothers and sisters
- Personal history of thrombosis (arterial or venous)
- Familial history of thrombosis before 45 years old (parents, brothers and sisters)
- Drug treatments of aspirin or anti-inflammatory type during the week before sampling
- Surgery the month before sampling
- Chronic pathology responsible for inflammatory syndrome
- Infectious episode in course
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
队列和干预
团体/队列 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
Volunteers
Blood sampling : 1 blood punction of 36.5 ml for each volunteer
|
Samplings will be taken on 4 citrated S-monovette tubes, 3 citrated tubes and 1 EDTA tube, namely 36.5 ml for each volunteer
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) predicted by numerical models
大体时间:up to 12 monthes
|
ETP (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min)
measured in haemophilic patients is compared to ETP predicted by numerical models.
|
up to 12 monthes
|
|
Lag Time of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models
大体时间:up to 12 monthes
|
Lag time (min) measured in haemophilic patients is compared to the lag time predicted by numerical models
|
up to 12 monthes
|
|
Peak value of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models
大体时间:up to 12 monthes
|
Peak value (nmol thrombin) measured in haemophilic patients is compared to the peak value predicted by numerical models
|
up to 12 monthes
|
|
Time to peak (TTP) of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models
大体时间:up to 12 monthes
|
TTP (min) measured in haemophilic patients is compared to TTP predicted by numerical models
|
up to 12 monthes
|
|
Velocity Index (V) of the thrombin generation curve predicted by numerical models
大体时间:up to 12 monthes
|
Velocity Index measured in haemophilic patients is compared to TTP predicted by numerical models
|
up to 12 monthes
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Endogenous Thrombin Potential (ETP) for volunteers
大体时间:day 1
|
ETP (i.e. the aera under the thrombin generation curve, nM.min) is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)
|
day 1
|
|
Lag Time of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers
大体时间:day 1
|
Lag time (min) of the thrombin generation curve is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)
|
day 1
|
|
Peak value of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers
大体时间:day 1
|
Peak value of the thrombin generation curve is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)
|
day 1
|
|
Time to peak (TTP) of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers
大体时间:day 1
|
TTP of the thrombin generation curve is measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)
|
day 1
|
|
Velocity Index (V) of the thrombin generation curve for volunteers
大体时间:day 1
|
Velocity Index (V) of the thrombin generation curves measured by Thromboplastin Generation Tests (TGTs)
|
day 1
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Brigitte TARDY-PONCET, MD、Chu Saint-Etienne
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始
2015年3月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2015年7月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2015年7月1日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2014年11月18日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2014年11月21日
首次发布 (估计)
2014年11月25日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (估计)
2015年8月13日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2015年8月12日
最后验证
2015年8月1日
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.