此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Study Design of the Empirical Evaluation of the AISBE Program in Catalonia

2019年9月5日 更新者:Carme Hernandez、Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

The project has a threefold aim: (i) Assessment of Home Hospitalization and Early Discharge (HH/ED) deployment at Hospital Clinic over a period of 10 years (2006-2015) as a preliminary analysis fo the second aim (ii) Large scale deployment of HH/ED and Transitional Care services; and, (iii) Population-based study on cost-effectiveness of integrated care services in the urban healthcare sector of Barcelona-Esquerra (540.000 inhabitants). The central hypothesis is that the approach will show safety and effectiveness with high level of user's acceptance and health value generation leading to sustainability of the service.The preliminary data indicate that HH/ED shows potential to strengthen care coordination between highly specialized hospital-based care and home-based services involving different levels of complexity. The need for appropriately designed transitional care services has been identified as the best option, not only for an efficient transference of patients from hospital to the community after hospital discharge, but as a way to overcome well identified limitations for generalization of community-based integrated care services.

AISBE is a population-based health initiative aiming at deployment of integrated care in one urban healthcare sector (Barcelona-Esquerra, 540.000 inhabitants) in the city of Barcelona. Within this initiative, the HH/ED program carried out by Hospital Clinic provides home-based hospitalization. Moreover, the program aims to implement transitional care strategies for optimal discharge.

The current document describes three studies: (Study 1) Analysis of the period 2006-2015; (Study 2) Program-based analysis of Home Hospitalization/Early Discharge (HH/ED) , and, (Study 3) Population-based analysis of cost-effectiveness of AISBE-based services. Study 2 is a program-based analysis of Home Hospitalization/Early Discharge (HH/ED). A quasi-experimental design. That is, a non-randomized intervention group (integrated care) will be compared with a control group (usual care) using propensity score matching wherein age, gender and health risk scoring will be main matching variables. The population-based evaluation will be done using registry data obtained from the Catalan Health Surveillance System (CHSS).

The protocol evaluation follows a Triple Aim approach considering pre-defined outcome variables for: a) health and well-being, b) experience with care, and c) costs.

研究概览

详细说明

AIMS: 1) To evaluate the HH/ED as mainstream service during the last decade (2006-2015); 2) To assess healthcare value generation of during the process of large scale deployment of the HH/ED program including generation of information useful for further refinement of transitional care in AISBE; and, 3) To assess the cost-effectiveness of AISBE's integrated care services using a population-based approach. These studies will contribute to refine three core aspects of the ongoing services; that is, a) Service evaluation; b) Health risk assessment and service selection; and, c) Service workflow definition and execution.

Study 1 - It evaluates both characteristics and outcomes of the process of HH/ED deployment from 2006 to 2015 without a control group.

Study 2 - Since late 2016, HH/ED is offered as a first choice for hospitalization to patients admitted in the Emergency room of Hospital Clinic. The current program has potential for 36 home-based admissions on a 24x7 day basis. The study will cover all patients admitted in the program (estimated 1,500 candidates) using both registry data and electronic medical records. Moreover, a subset of 200 consecutive HH candidates admitted through the Emergency room at Hospital Clinic will be selected using a 1:4 ratio. They will perform a complete study adding administration of standardized questionnaires carried out during HH/ED admission, one-month and three month after HH/ED discharge.

The intervention group will receive the standard HH/ED service and it will be compared with a control group that will include the same number of patients (n=200) under conventional hospitalization. The control group will be selected from those patients admitted in the Emergency room of the Hospital Clinic, but transferred to Hospital Sagrat Cor (within AISBE) for conventional hospitalization. Inclusion of the control group will also follow 1:4 ratio. Matching between intervention and control groups will be periodically assessed by groups of 10 patients.

The study design, as described, does not include Early Discharge patients included from highly specialized programs carried out at Hospital Clinic. Consequently, an additional HH/ED group of 100 patients from those programs will be also characterized (without control group) in order to properly identify the needs of this subset of patients for transitional care.

Finally, the population-based study (Study 3) will assess the Barcelona-Esquerra as intervention group will be compared with data from the other three healthcare sectors from the city of Barcelona, taken as control groups, because they do no have well identified integrated care programs.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

400

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Barcelona、西班牙、08036
        • Hospital Clinic. Integrated Care Unit

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living in his/her house within the healthcare sector
  • Having caregiver during 24h per day
  • Having phone at home
  • Signing written acceptance to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High risk of severe clinical deterioration not treatable at home, as assessed by best medical judgment
  • Admission in a short stay unit; and, iii) severe psychiatric disorder

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:非随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Home Hospitalization
Visit every day at home
Visit every 24 hours
安慰剂比较:Conventional Hospitalization
Review Clinical History
No intervention

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Costs
大体时间:30 days
Health Care Cost
30 days

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Health and well-being
大体时间:30 days
Hospital admissions
30 days
Experience with care
大体时间:30 days
Satisfaction
30 days

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Carme Hernandez, PhD、Hospital Clinic

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2017年12月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2018年7月30日

研究完成 (实际的)

2018年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2017年4月10日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2017年4月21日

首次发布 (实际的)

2017年4月26日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年9月6日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年9月5日

最后验证

2019年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • SELFIE-HH/ED

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

Home Hospitalization的临床试验

订阅