此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Ultrasound-Guided Transversalis Fascia Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block for Analgesia After Appendectomy in Pediatrics

2026年5月25日 更新者:Salma Ashraf Rajab Elkolally、Tanta University

Ultrasound-Guided Transversalis Fascia Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block for Analgesia After Appendectomy in Pediatrics: A Prospective Randomized Study

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Transversalis Fascia Plane block versus Quadratus Lumborum block for postoperative pain relief in pediatrics undergoing appendectomy.

Primary outcomes:

• Proportion of patients needing rescue analgesia within the first 24 postoperative hours.

Secondary outcomes:

  • Visual Analogue Scale pain intensity measurements.
  • Intraoperative Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure will be recorded.
  • Time to first analgesic request for patients needing rescue analgesia (Fentanyl).
  • Block-related complications (e.g., hematoma, local anesthetic toxicity, lower limb weakness).
  • Parents' satisfaction score.

研究概览

详细说明

Appendicectomy is amongst the most commonly performed surgery, with acute appendicitis being the most frequent reason for abdominal surgical emergencies in the world . The lifetime risk of appendicitis is 7-8%, with rising incidence in the newly industrialized countries . The prevailing treatment of choice for appendicitis is appendicectomy, which can be performed either 'open' or laparoscopically .

A major contributor to the pain experienced by a patient after abdominal surgery is the incision made in the abdominal wall . Almost 80% of patients undergoing surgery experience postoperative pain, and 80% of them reported moderate-to-severe pain intensity .

Traditional methods of postoperative pain management in children, such as systemic opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs , may not always provide adequate relief, especially for more invasive procedures . These approaches can also be associated with side effects like sedation, nausea, and respiratory depression, which may complicate postoperative care and recovery . In recent years, regional anesthesia techniques have emerged as promising alternatives for postoperative pain management in various surgical populations Two specific regional blocks that have gained attention for their potential benefits in reducing postoperative pain after abdominal surgeries is the Quadratus Lumborum Block and the Transversus Facial Abdominal Plane block The Quadratus Lumborum Block targets the nerves supplying the lumbar plexus, providing analgesia to the anterior abdominal wall . It has been shown to be effective in adult patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery, offering improved postoperative pain scores and reduced opioid consumption compared to traditional pain management strategies .

Although, both Quadratus Lumborum Block and Transversus Facial Abdominal Plane block are frequently employed in pediatric anesthesia, evidence to guide clinical decisions on which block offers superior outcomes needs to be comprehensively reviewed. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Transversalis Fascia Plane block versus Quadratus Lumborum block for postoperative pain relief in pediatrics undergoing appendectomy.

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Transversalis Fascia Plane block versus Quadratus Lumborum block for postoperative pain relief in pediatrics undergoing appendectomy.

Primary outcomes:

• Proportion of patients needing rescue analgesia within the first 24 postoperative hours.

Secondary outcomes:

  • Visual Analogue Scale pain intensity measurements.
  • Intraoperative Heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure will be recorded.
  • Time to first analgesic request for patients needing rescue analgesia (Fentanyl).
  • Block-related complications (e.g., hematoma, local anesthetic toxicity, lower limb weakness).
  • Parents' satisfaction score.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

70

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Tanta、埃及
        • Tanta University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子

接受健康志愿者

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 70 patients aged between 7 and 12 years of both sexes undergoing appendectomy, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of parents to participate
  • Patients with peritonitis
  • History of allergy to bupivacaine and other amide local anesthetics
  • Infection at the site of block needle entry
  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Neurological disorders
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists ≥ III

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:预防
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:双倍的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Group I: Transversalis Fascia Plane Block versus
Patients will receive general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block in a dose of 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine administered prior to surgical excision
35 Patients will receive general anesthesia and ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block in a dose of 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine administered prior to surgical excision.
实验性的:Group II :Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block
patients will receive general anesthesia and a quadratus lumborum plane block in a dose of 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine administered prior to surgical excision.
35 patients will receive general anesthesia and a quadratus lumborum plane block in a dose of 0.4 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine administered prior to surgical excision

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
大体时间
Proportion of patients needing rescue analgesia
大体时间:within the first 24 postoperative hours.
within the first 24 postoperative hours.

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Visual Analogue Scale
大体时间:24 postoperative hours
Visual Analogue Scale pain intensity measurements.
24 postoperative hours

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年6月30日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年5月20日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年5月20日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月25日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月25日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月25日

最后验证

2025年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 36264MS975/6/25

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

It will be available if it needed

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液
  • 国际碳纤维联合会

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅