Use of Football in Programs to Reduce Stigma Toward Mental Illness: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Contact Interaction and Video-Based Approaches
2026年6月16日 更新者：Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of football-based interventions in reducing stigma toward mental illness among university students. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does participating in a contact-based education program involving football help reduce stigma toward mental illness among university students?
- What are the effects of three different intervention methods on reducing stigma toward mental illness?
Researchers will compare the traditional contact-based education program with the other two interventions to evaluate their differences in effectiveness.
Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups.
- Complete online assessments to measure attitudes toward mental illness before and after the intervention.
- Participate in qualitative interviews to provide in-depth feedback on their experiences and perceptions.
研究概览
地位
招聘中
研究类型
介入性
注册 (估计的)
210
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Ming-De Chen, Ph.D.
- 电话号码：2657 +886-73121101
- 邮箱：mdchen@kmu.edu.tw
学习地点
-
-
-
Kaohsiung City、台湾
- 招聘中
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
-
接触：
- Ming-De Chen, Ph.D.
- 电话号码：2657 +886-73121101
- 邮箱：mdchen@kmu.edu.tw
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
接受健康志愿者
是的
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- University students currently enrolled, aged between 18 and 30 years.
- In good physical condition with no contraindications to exercise (i.e., not diagnosed by a physician or advised to avoid physical activity, and with no items selected on the PAR-Q+ [Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone]).
- Able to follow the study procedures and provide signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who are unable to safely participate in football activities due to intellectual disability, pregnancy, head injury, cardiovascular disease, or other neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders.
- Individuals who are unable to effectively participate in the intervention program or complete assessments due to significant emotional disturbances, personality disorders, substance (alcohol) abuse, or severe mental illness.
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：双倍的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器：Contact-based education
Mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
|
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours, consisting of psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
|
|
实验性的：Video and contact-based education
Video viewing, mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
|
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours, including football video viewing, psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
|
|
实验性的：Football and contact-based education
Football interaction, video viewing, mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
|
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours.
The session includes football interactive activities, football video viewing, psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge
大体时间：pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), consisting of 12 items, will be used to assess the public's knowledge related to mental health stigma.
The questionnaire is divided into two parts: knowledge about mental illness and agreement with statements regarding mental health conditions.
Responses are rated on a five-point Likert scale (5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree / Don't know, 2 = Slightly disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree).
The total score ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater level of knowledge about mental health.
Items 7 to 12 are designed to assess recognition and familiarity with various mental health conditions, helping to contextualize responses to the earlier items.
|
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
|
Attitudes
大体时间：pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
The Questionnaire on Stigmatizing Attitudes Towards Mental Illness will be used in this study.
After undergoing cultural adaptation and psychometric validation, the final Chinese version consists of 16 items across four dimensions: Negative Stereotypes (5 items), Social Distance (3 items), Negative Evaluation (5 items), and Self-Stigma (3 items).
Responses are measured on a six-point Likert scale (6 = Strongly agree, 5 = Agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Slightly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree).
The total score ranges from 16 to 96, with higher scores indicating greater levels of negative stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness.
|
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
|
Intent
大体时间：pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
The Social Distance Scale will be adopted to assess participants' level of social distance toward individuals with mental illness, serving as an indicator of intent to act.
The scale consists of 8 items, which evaluate willingness to engage with people with mental illness in various situations, such as living in the same community or building, sharing a residence, dining together, forming friendships, working together, employing, or helping them.
Responses are rated on a six-point Likert scale (6 = Strongly agree, 5 = Agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Slightly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree).
Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to interact with individuals with mental illness.
This scale is considered to be particularly sensitive to measuring implicit bias.
|
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 学习椅：Ming-De Chen, Ph.D.、Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2026年3月2日
初级完成 (估计的)
2027年7月31日
研究完成 (估计的)
2027年10月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2026年5月27日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2026年6月16日
首次发布 (实际的)
2026年6月18日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2026年6月18日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2026年6月16日
最后验证
2025年7月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- KMUHIRB-F(I)-20250110
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
未定
IPD 计划说明
The data will be used to publish academic papers, it has not been determined whether it will be shared with other researchers.
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.