Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Use of Football in Programs to Reduce Stigma Toward Mental Illness: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Contact Interaction and Video-Based Approaches

16 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of football-based interventions in reducing stigma toward mental illness among university students. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does participating in a contact-based education program involving football help reduce stigma toward mental illness among university students?
  • What are the effects of three different intervention methods on reducing stigma toward mental illness?

Researchers will compare the traditional contact-based education program with the other two interventions to evaluate their differences in effectiveness.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups.
  • Complete online assessments to measure attitudes toward mental illness before and after the intervention.
  • Participate in qualitative interviews to provide in-depth feedback on their experiences and perceptions.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

210

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Ming-De Chen, Ph.D.
  • Número de teléfono: 2657 +886-73121101
  • Correo electrónico: mdchen@kmu.edu.tw

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Kaohsiung City, Taiwán
        • Reclutamiento
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
        • Contacto:
          • Ming-De Chen, Ph.D.
          • Número de teléfono: 2657 +886-73121101
          • Correo electrónico: mdchen@kmu.edu.tw

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • University students currently enrolled, aged between 18 and 30 years.
  • In good physical condition with no contraindications to exercise (i.e., not diagnosed by a physician or advised to avoid physical activity, and with no items selected on the PAR-Q+ [Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone]).
  • Able to follow the study procedures and provide signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are unable to safely participate in football activities due to intellectual disability, pregnancy, head injury, cardiovascular disease, or other neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Individuals who are unable to effectively participate in the intervention program or complete assessments due to significant emotional disturbances, personality disorders, substance (alcohol) abuse, or severe mental illness.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Doble

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Contact-based education
Mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours, consisting of psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
Experimental: Video and contact-based education
Video viewing, mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours, including football video viewing, psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
Experimental: Football and contact-based education
Football interaction, video viewing, mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours. The session includes football interactive activities, football video viewing, psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Knowledge
Periodo de tiempo: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), consisting of 12 items, will be used to assess the public's knowledge related to mental health stigma. The questionnaire is divided into two parts: knowledge about mental illness and agreement with statements regarding mental health conditions. Responses are rated on a five-point Likert scale (5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree / Don't know, 2 = Slightly disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree). The total score ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater level of knowledge about mental health. Items 7 to 12 are designed to assess recognition and familiarity with various mental health conditions, helping to contextualize responses to the earlier items.
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
Attitudes
Periodo de tiempo: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
The Questionnaire on Stigmatizing Attitudes Towards Mental Illness will be used in this study. After undergoing cultural adaptation and psychometric validation, the final Chinese version consists of 16 items across four dimensions: Negative Stereotypes (5 items), Social Distance (3 items), Negative Evaluation (5 items), and Self-Stigma (3 items). Responses are measured on a six-point Likert scale (6 = Strongly agree, 5 = Agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Slightly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree). The total score ranges from 16 to 96, with higher scores indicating greater levels of negative stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness.
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
Intent
Periodo de tiempo: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
The Social Distance Scale will be adopted to assess participants' level of social distance toward individuals with mental illness, serving as an indicator of intent to act. The scale consists of 8 items, which evaluate willingness to engage with people with mental illness in various situations, such as living in the same community or building, sharing a residence, dining together, forming friendships, working together, employing, or helping them. Responses are rated on a six-point Likert scale (6 = Strongly agree, 5 = Agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Slightly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree). Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to interact with individuals with mental illness. This scale is considered to be particularly sensitive to measuring implicit bias.
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Silla de estudio: Ming-De Chen, Ph.D., Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

2 de marzo de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de julio de 2027

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de octubre de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

27 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

16 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

18 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

18 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

16 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2025

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Descripción del plan IPD

The data will be used to publish academic papers, it has not been determined whether it will be shared with other researchers.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir