Use of Football in Programs to Reduce Stigma Toward Mental Illness: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Contact Interaction and Video-Based Approaches
2026년 6월 16일 업데이트: Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of football-based interventions in reducing stigma toward mental illness among university students. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does participating in a contact-based education program involving football help reduce stigma toward mental illness among university students?
- What are the effects of three different intervention methods on reducing stigma toward mental illness?
Researchers will compare the traditional contact-based education program with the other two interventions to evaluate their differences in effectiveness.
Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups.
- Complete online assessments to measure attitudes toward mental illness before and after the intervention.
- Participate in qualitative interviews to provide in-depth feedback on their experiences and perceptions.
연구 개요
상태
모병
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (추정된)
210
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 연락처
- 이름: Ming-De Chen, Ph.D.
- 전화번호: 2657 +886-73121101
- 이메일: mdchen@kmu.edu.tw
연구 장소
-
-
-
Kaohsiung City, 대만
- 모병
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
-
연락하다:
- Ming-De Chen, Ph.D.
- 전화번호: 2657 +886-73121101
- 이메일: mdchen@kmu.edu.tw
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
예
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- University students currently enrolled, aged between 18 and 30 years.
- In good physical condition with no contraindications to exercise (i.e., not diagnosed by a physician or advised to avoid physical activity, and with no items selected on the PAR-Q+ [Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone]).
- Able to follow the study procedures and provide signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who are unable to safely participate in football activities due to intellectual disability, pregnancy, head injury, cardiovascular disease, or other neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders.
- Individuals who are unable to effectively participate in the intervention program or complete assessments due to significant emotional disturbances, personality disorders, substance (alcohol) abuse, or severe mental illness.
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
- 마스킹: 더블
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
활성 비교기: Contact-based education
Mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
|
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours, consisting of psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
|
|
실험적: Video and contact-based education
Video viewing, mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
|
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours, including football video viewing, psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
|
|
실험적: Football and contact-based education
Football interaction, video viewing, mental health education and listening to the stories of individuals with mental illness and interactive sharing.
|
A one-time session lasting approximately 1.5 to 2.5 hours.
The session includes football interactive activities, football video viewing, psychiatric education, storytelling by individuals with mental illness, and interactive discussion.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge
기간: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
The Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), consisting of 12 items, will be used to assess the public's knowledge related to mental health stigma.
The questionnaire is divided into two parts: knowledge about mental illness and agreement with statements regarding mental health conditions.
Responses are rated on a five-point Likert scale (5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree / Don't know, 2 = Slightly disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree).
The total score ranges from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating a greater level of knowledge about mental health.
Items 7 to 12 are designed to assess recognition and familiarity with various mental health conditions, helping to contextualize responses to the earlier items.
|
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
|
Attitudes
기간: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
The Questionnaire on Stigmatizing Attitudes Towards Mental Illness will be used in this study.
After undergoing cultural adaptation and psychometric validation, the final Chinese version consists of 16 items across four dimensions: Negative Stereotypes (5 items), Social Distance (3 items), Negative Evaluation (5 items), and Self-Stigma (3 items).
Responses are measured on a six-point Likert scale (6 = Strongly agree, 5 = Agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Slightly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree).
The total score ranges from 16 to 96, with higher scores indicating greater levels of negative stigmatizing attitudes toward mental illness.
|
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
|
Intent
기간: pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
The Social Distance Scale will be adopted to assess participants' level of social distance toward individuals with mental illness, serving as an indicator of intent to act.
The scale consists of 8 items, which evaluate willingness to engage with people with mental illness in various situations, such as living in the same community or building, sharing a residence, dining together, forming friendships, working together, employing, or helping them.
Responses are rated on a six-point Likert scale (6 = Strongly agree, 5 = Agree, 4 = Slightly agree, 3 = Slightly disagree, 2 = Disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree).
Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to interact with individuals with mental illness.
This scale is considered to be particularly sensitive to measuring implicit bias.
|
pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, and at one- and six-month follow-ups.
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
수사관
- 연구 의자: Ming-De Chen, Ph.D., Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2026년 3월 2일
기본 완료 (추정된)
2027년 7월 31일
연구 완료 (추정된)
2027년 10월 31일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2026년 5월 27일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2026년 6월 16일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 6월 18일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2026년 6월 18일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2026년 6월 16일
마지막으로 확인됨
2025년 7월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- KMUHIRB-F(I)-20250110
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
미정
IPD 계획 설명
The data will be used to publish academic papers, it has not been determined whether it will be shared with other researchers.
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
Contact-Based Education에 대한 임상 시험
-
Chia-Tzu Line완전한
-
Qazvin University Of Medical Sciences완전한