此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

VIDEO LEARNING FOR EMPATHY, ETHICS AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION

2026年7月16日 更新者:FatmaOzder、Kocaeli Sağlık ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi

THE EFFECT OF A VIDEO BASED DIGITAL LEARNING INTERVENTION ON NURSING STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF EMPATHY, ETHICAL SENSITIVITY, AND FAMILY WITNESSED RESUSCITATION IN THEIR PATIENT PERSPECTIVE EXPERIENCES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

This clinical trial (randomized controlled experimental study) aims to learn about the effects of presenting the family-witnessed CPR process from a patient's perspective through 360° virtual reality and 2D video within second-year nursing students. The primary question(s) / hypotheses it aims to answer are:

  • H1: Will the content validity ratio of the developed scenario be above 0.80?
  • H2: Is the increase in empathy scores (pre-test/post-test difference) of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups?
  • H3: Is the increase in ethical sensitivity scores of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher compared to the 2D video and control groups?
  • H4: Is the change in perception scores toward family-witnessed CPR more positive in the 360° VR group compared to the other groups, and is their mean SUS (System Usability Scale) score at or above the acceptability threshold of 70?
  • H5: Is the VES (Video Engagement Skale) score of students in the 360° VR group significantly higher than that of the 2D video group? Researchers will compare the 360° immersive video (360° VR) group, the 2-dimensional (2D) video group, and the control group to see if there are effects on empathy, ethical sensitivity, perception of risks-benefits of family presence, self-confidence regarding family presence, video engagement, and system usability.

Participants will be asked to:

  • Watch the scenario reenactment involving a family-witnessed CPR process, recorded via a 360° camera (in either 360° VR or 2D format, depending on their assigned group).
  • Complete data collection tools consisting of the Introductory Information Form, "Jefferson Scale of Empathy", "Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire", "Family Presence Risk-Benefit Scale and Family Presence Self-Confidence Scale", "System Usability Scale (SUS-TR)", and "Video Engagement Skale(VES)".

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

105

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a second-year undergraduate nursing student
  • Volunteering to participate in the study and signing the informed consent form
  • Not having participated in a similar virtual reality or family-witnessed CPR study before

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a diagnosed neurological or psychiatric disorder that prevents using virtual reality glasses (such as epilepsy, severe vertigo, or motion sickness)
  • Having uncorrected visual or hearing impairments
  • Not completing all stages of the study (pre-test, intervention, or post-test)

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:360 VR Video Group
Nursing students who watch the family-witnessed CPR scenario from a patient perspective using 360-degree virtual reality.
Immersive 360-degree virtual reality video scenario of family-witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation presented from a patient perspective.
实验性的:2D Video Group
Nursing students who watch the family-witnessed CPR scenario from a patient perspective as a standard 2-dimensional video.
Standard 2-dimensional video scenario of family-witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation presented from a patient perspective.
无干预:Control Group
Nursing students who receive traditional nursing education without watching any video or VR scenario.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Jefferson Scale of Empathy Scores
大体时间:Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)
This scale evaluates the nursing students empathy levels. Higher scores indicate higher empathy levels.
Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)
Change in Ethical Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores
大体时间:Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)
This questionnaire evaluates the ethical sensitivity levels of nursing students. Higher scores indicate higher ethical sensitivity.
Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)
Change in Family Presence Risk Benefit Scale and Family Presence Self Confidence Scale Scores
大体时间:Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)
These scales evaluate students perceptions of the risks/benefits and their self-confidence regarding family presence during CPR.
Baseline (Pre-test) and right after the intervention (Post-test)
System Usability Scale Scores
大体时间:Right after the intervention (Post-test)
The System Usability Scale (SUS) evaluates the perceived usability of the 360 VR and 2D video systems. Higher scores indicate better usability.
Right after the intervention (Post-test)
Video Engagement Scale Scores
大体时间:Right after the intervention (Post-test)
The Video Engagement Scale (VES) evaluates the video engagement and immersion levels of the students. Higher scores indicate higher engagement.
Right after the intervention (Post-test)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年7月4日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年12月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年4月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月2日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月2日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月9日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月17日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月16日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅