此页面是自动翻译的，不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Recall and Perceived Applicability of Ganzouri Airway Scoring System Versus LEMON Score for Airway Assessment Among Anesthesia Residents

2026年9月20日 更新者：Ghada AboBakr Mohamed Sherif、Cairo University

Comparison of Recall and Perceived Applicability of Ganzouri Airway Scoring System Versus LEMON Score for Airway Assessment Among Anesthesia Residents; a Prospective Observational Study

Our aim is to compare the recall and perceived clinical applicability of Ganzouri airway scoring system versus LEMON score for airway assessment from residents' perspective.

研究概览

地位

招聘中

条件

干预/治疗

详细说明

Securing a patent airway stands as one of the most fundamental obligations in anesthetic practice, and the timely recognition of a potentially difficult airway prior to induction is of paramount importance for patient safety.

Two of the most widely recognized examples are the Ganzouri Airway Scoring system and the LEMON score. The Ganzouri Airway scoring system integrates seven distinct clinical parameters; mouth opening, thyromental distance, Mallampati classification, neck range of motion, ability to prognath, body weight, and history of prior difficult intubation, each carrying a weighted numerical value whose sum reflects the probability of encountering a difficult airway.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

44

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

  • 埃及
      • Cairo、埃及、12613
        • 招聘中
        • Cairo University
        • 接触：

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

25年 至 28年 (成人)

接受健康志愿者

不

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

This study was designed as a prospective observational educational study that compared the recall and perceived clinical applicability of two airway assessment scoring systems: the Ganzouri Airway Score and the LEMON Score

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled anesthesiology residents.
  • Currently training at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals.
  • Willing to participate and provide informed consent.
  • Available for entire study duration (baseline through 2-week followup).
  • First-year residents who didn't receive training in Ganzouri or LEMON Airway scoring systems.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents with prior formal training in either Ganzouri or LEMON Airway scoring systems (defined as structured lecture or workshop exceeding 30 minutes).
  • Residents who will be on leave, rotation at external sites, or otherwise unavailable during the 2-week follow-up period.
  • Refusal to participate or provide consent.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的？

设计细节

  • 观测模型：COHORT
  • 时间观点：PROSPECTIVE

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Study group

First-year residents who didn't receive training in Ganzouri or LEMON Airway scoring systems.
其他：Ganzouri Airway Scoring System

This scoring system evaluates seven parameters:

  1. Mouth opening (interincisor distance)
  2. Thyromental distance
  3. Mallampati classification
  4. Neck movement
  5. Ability to prognath (mandibular protrusion)
  6. Body weight
  7. History of difficult intubation Each parameter was scored, score interpretation from 1- 4 with increasing difficulty , ≥4 suggesting awake intubation.
其他：LEMON Score

The LEMON mnemonic represents:

  1. Look externally (facial trauma, large incisors, beard, etc.)
  2. Evaluate 3-3-2 rule (mouth opening, hyomental distance, thyroidtomouth distance)
  3. Mallampati score
  4. Obstruction (presence of airway obstruction)
  5. Neck mobility

研究衡量的是什么？

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean total immediate recall score
大体时间：Within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures

The total immediate recall score was assessed using a structured recall checklist within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures.
Within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean total delayed recall score at Day 14
大体时间：14 days after completion of the educational lectures

The total delayed recall score will be assessed using the same structured recall checklist 14 days after completion of the educational lectures.
14 days after completion of the educational lectures
Resident satisfaction
大体时间：14 days after completion of the educational lectures

Residents' satisfaction was assessed using a structured post-lecture questionnaire with five-point Likert-scale responses.
14 days after completion of the educational lectures

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

赞助

Cairo University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年9月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年12月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年9月20日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年9月20日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年9月25日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月25日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月20日

最后验证

2026年9月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • MS-225-2026 (1-7-2026)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？

是的

IPD 计划说明

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD 共享时间框架

After the end of study for one year.

IPD 共享访问标准

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅