Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Recall and Perceived Applicability of Ganzouri Airway Scoring System Versus LEMON Score for Airway Assessment Among Anesthesia Residents

20. september 2026 opdateret af: Ghada AboBakr Mohamed Sherif, Cairo University

Comparison of Recall and Perceived Applicability of Ganzouri Airway Scoring System Versus LEMON Score for Airway Assessment Among Anesthesia Residents; a Prospective Observational Study

Our aim is to compare the recall and perceived clinical applicability of Ganzouri airway scoring system versus LEMON score for airway assessment from residents' perspective.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Securing a patent airway stands as one of the most fundamental obligations in anesthetic practice, and the timely recognition of a potentially difficult airway prior to induction is of paramount importance for patient safety.

Two of the most widely recognized examples are the Ganzouri Airway Scoring system and the LEMON score. The Ganzouri Airway scoring system integrates seven distinct clinical parameters; mouth opening, thyromental distance, Mallampati classification, neck range of motion, ability to prognath, body weight, and history of prior difficult intubation, each carrying a weighted numerical value whose sum reflects the probability of encountering a difficult airway.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Anslået)

44

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiekontakt

Studiesteder

      • Cairo, Egypten, 12613
        • Rekruttering
        • Cairo University
        • Kontakt:

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

25 år til 28 år (Voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

This study was designed as a prospective observational educational study that compared the recall and perceived clinical applicability of two airway assessment scoring systems: the Ganzouri Airway Score and the LEMON Score

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled anesthesiology residents.
  • Currently training at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals.
  • Willing to participate and provide informed consent.
  • Available for entire study duration (baseline through 2-week followup).
  • First-year residents who didn't receive training in Ganzouri or LEMON Airway scoring systems.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents with prior formal training in either Ganzouri or LEMON Airway scoring systems (defined as structured lecture or workshop exceeding 30 minutes).
  • Residents who will be on leave, rotation at external sites, or otherwise unavailable during the 2-week follow-up period.
  • Refusal to participate or provide consent.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Observationsmodeller: COHORT
  • Tidsperspektiver: PROSPECTIVE

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
Study group

First-year residents who didn't receive training in Ganzouri or LEMON Airway scoring systems.

This scoring system evaluates seven parameters:

  1. Mouth opening (interincisor distance)
  2. Thyromental distance
  3. Mallampati classification
  4. Neck movement
  5. Ability to prognath (mandibular protrusion)
  6. Body weight
  7. History of difficult intubation Each parameter was scored, score interpretation from 1- 4 with increasing difficulty , ≥4 suggesting awake intubation.

The LEMON mnemonic represents:

  1. Look externally (facial trauma, large incisors, beard, etc.)
  2. Evaluate 3-3-2 rule (mouth opening, hyomental distance, thyroidtomouth distance)
  3. Mallampati score
  4. Obstruction (presence of airway obstruction)
  5. Neck mobility

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Mean total immediate recall score
Tidsramme: Within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures

The total immediate recall score was assessed using a structured recall checklist within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures.

Within 30 minutes after completion of the educational lectures

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Mean total delayed recall score at Day 14
Tidsramme: 14 days after completion of the educational lectures

The total delayed recall score will be assessed using the same structured recall checklist 14 days after completion of the educational lectures.

14 days after completion of the educational lectures
Resident satisfaction
Tidsramme: 14 days after completion of the educational lectures

Residents' satisfaction was assessed using a structured post-lecture questionnaire with five-point Likert-scale responses.

14 days after completion of the educational lectures

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

1. september 2026

Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)

1. december 2026

Studieafslutning (Anslået)

1. december 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

20. september 2026

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

20. september 2026

Først opslået (Faktiske)

25. september 2026

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

25. september 2026

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

20. september 2026

Sidst verificeret

1. september 2026

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • MS-225-2026 (1-7-2026)

Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)

Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?

JA

IPD-planbeskrivelse

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD-delingstidsramme

After the end of study for one year.

IPD-delingsadgangskriterier

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD-deling Understøttende informationstype

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt

Ingen

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt

Ingen

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner