A Comparative Study of Conventional Physiotherapy versus Robot-Assisted Gait Training Associated to Physiotherapy in Individuals with Ataxia after Stroke

Marcia Belas Dos Santos, Clarissa Barros de Oliveira, Arly Dos Santos, Cristhiane Garabello Pires, Viviana Dylewski, Ricardo Mario Arida, Marcia Belas Dos Santos, Clarissa Barros de Oliveira, Arly Dos Santos, Cristhiane Garabello Pires, Viviana Dylewski, Ricardo Mario Arida

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the influence of RAGT on balance, coordination, and functional independence in activities of daily living of chronic stroke survivors with ataxia at least one year of injury.

Methods: It was a randomized controlled trial. The patients were allocated to either therapist-assisted gait training (TAGT) or robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT). Both groups received 3 weekly sessions of physiotherapy with an estimated duration of 60 minutes each and prescribed home exercises. The following outcome measures were evaluated prior to and after the completion of the 5-month protocol treatment: BBS, TUG test, FIM, and SARA. For intragroup comparisons, the Wilcoxon test was used, and the Mann-Whitney test was used for between-group comparison.

Results: Nineteen stroke survivors with ataxia sequel after one year of injury were recruited. Both groups showed statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) in balance, functional independencein, and general ataxia symptoms. There were no statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) for between-group comparisons both at baseline and after completion of the protocol.

Conclusions: Chronic stroke patients with ataxia had significant improvements in balance and independence in activities of daily living after RAGT along with conventional therapy and home exercises. This trial was registered with trial registration number 39862414.6.0000.5505.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in assessment and rating of ataxia. P value represents intragroup differences. Requirement for a statistically significant difference: P < 0.05. P value for between-group comparison: {P = 0.82; P = 0.64}. Requirement for a statistically significant difference: P < 0.05.

References

    1. Pennycott A., Wyss D., Vallery H., Klamroth-Marganska V., Riener R. Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2012;9(1):65–13. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-65.
    1. Lloyd-Jones D., Adams R. J., Brown T. M., et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2010;121(7):948–954. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192666.
    1. Bultmann U., Pierscianek D., Gizewski E. R., et al. Functional recovery and rehabilitation of postural impairment and gait ataxia in patients with acute cerebellar stroke. Gait & Posture. 2014;39(1):563–569. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.09.011.
    1. Husemann B., Müller F., Krewer C., Heller S., Koenig E. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke. 2007;38(2):349–354. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254607.48765.cb.
    1. Krishnan C., Kotsapouikis D., Dhaher Y. Y., Rymer W. Z. Reducing robotic guidance during robot-assisted gait training improves gait function: a case report on a stroke survivor. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2013;94(6):1202–1206. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.016.
    1. Indredavik B., Rohweder G., Naalsund E., Lydersen S. Medical complications in a comprehensive stroke unit and an early supported discharge service. Stroke. 2008;39(2):414–420. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.489294.
    1. Bonnì S., Ponzo V., Caltagirone C., Koch G. Cerebellar theta burst stimulation in stroke patients with ataxia. Functional Neurology. 2014;29(1):41–45. doi: 10.11138/fneur/2014.29.1.041.
    1. Maeshima S., Osawa A., Miyazaki Y., Takeda H., Tanahashi N. Functional outcome in patients with pontine infarction after acute rehabilitation. Neurological Sciences. 2012;33(4):759–764. doi: 10.1007/s10072-011-0812-0.
    1. Datar S., Rabinstein A. A. Cerebellar hemorrhage. Neurologic Clinics. 2014;32(4):993–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.07.006.
    1. Ilg W., Golla H., Thier P., Giese M. A. Specific influences of cerebellar dysfunctions on gait. Brain. 2007;130(3):786–798. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl376.
    1. Morton S. M., Tseng Y.-W., Zackowski K. M., Daline J. R., Bastian A. J. Longitudinal tracking of gait and balance impairments in cerebellar disease. Movement Disorders. 2010;25(12):1944–1952. doi: 10.1002/mds.23169.
    1. Sawacha Z., Carraro E., Contessa P., Guiotto A., Masiero S., Cobelli C. Relationship between clinical and instrumental balance assessments in chronic post-stroke hemiparesis subjects. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2013;10(1):p. 95. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-95.
    1. Hesse S. Treadmill training with partial body weight support after stroke: a review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23(1):55–65.
    1. Cho D. Y., Park S.-W., Lee M. J., Park D. S., Kim E. J. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on the balance and gait of chronic stroke patients: focus on dependent ambulators. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2015;27(10):3053–3057. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3053.
    1. Kubota S., Nakata Y., Eguchi K., et al. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patients with limited mobility. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2013;94(6):1080–1087. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.020.
    1. Jezernik S., Colombo G., Keller T., Frueh H., Morari M. Robotic orthosis lokomat: a rehabilitation and research tool. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2003;6(2):108–115. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2003.03017.x.
    1. Wallard L., Dietrich G., Kerlirzin Y., Bredin J. Effects of robotic gait rehabilitation on biomechanical parameters in the chronic hemiplegic patients. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015;45(3):215–219. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2015.03.002.
    1. Swinnen E., Beckwée D., Meeusen R., Baeyens J.-P., Kerckhofs E. Does robot-assisted gait rehabilitation improve balance in stroke patients? A systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2014;21(2):87–100. doi: 10.1310/tsr2102-87.
    1. Tefertiller C., Pharo B., Evans N., Winchester P. Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: a review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2011;48(4):387–416. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2010.04.0055.
    1. Hornby T. G., Campbell D. D., Kahn J. H., Demott T., Moore J. L., Roth H. R. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1786–1792. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779.
    1. Israel J. F., Campbell D. D., Kahn J. H., Hornby T. G. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Physical Therapy. 2006;86(11):1466–1478. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050266.
    1. Dundar U., Toktas H., Solak O., Ulasli A. M., Eroglu S. A comparative study of conventional physiotherapy versus robotic training combined with physiotherapy in patients with stroke. Topics in Stoke Rehabilitation. 2014;21(6):453–461. doi: 10.1310/tsr2106-453.
    1. Miyamoto S. T., Lombardi Junior I., Berg K. O., Ramos L. R., Natour J. Brazilian version of the Berg balance scale. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2004;37(9):1411–1421. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2004000900017.
    1. Hafsteinsdóttir T. B., Rensink M., Schuurmans M. Clinimetric properties of the timed up and go test for patients with stroke: a systematic review. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2014;21(3):197–210. doi: 10.1310/tsr2103-197.
    1. Kim B.-R., Lee J.-Y., Kim M. J., Jung H., Lee J. Korean version of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia in ataxic stroke patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2014;38(6):742–751. doi: 10.5535/arm.2014.38.6.742.
    1. Kim B.-R., Lim J.-H., Lee S. A., et al. Usefulness of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) in ataxic stroke patients. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2011;35(6):772–780. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.6.772.
    1. Braga-Neto P., Godeiro-Junior C., Dutra L. A., Pedroso J. L., Barsottini O. G. P. Translation and validation into Brazilian version of the scale of the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria. 2010;68(2):228–230. doi: 10.1590/S0004-282X2010000200014.
    1. Taveggia G., Borboni A., Mulé C., Villafañe J. H., Negrini S. Conflicting results of robot-assisted versus usual gait training during postacute rehabilitation of stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2016;39(1):29–35. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000137.
    1. Lopes P. G., Lopes J. A. F., Brito C. M., Alfieri F. M., Rizzo Battistella L. Relationships of balance, gait performance, and functional outcome in chronic stroke patients: a comparison of left and right lesions. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:8. doi: 10.1155/2015/716042.716042
    1. de Oliveira C. B., de Medeiros I. R., Frota N. A., Greters M. E., Conforto A. B. Balance control in hemiparetic stroke patients: main tools for evaluation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development. 2008;45(8):1215–1226.
    1. Conesa L., Costa Ú., Morales E., et al. An observational report of intensive robotic and manual gait training in sub-acute stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2012;9(1):p. 13. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-13.
    1. Tong R. K., Ng M. F., Li L. S. Effectiveness of gait training using an electromechanical gait trainer, with and without functional electric stimulation, in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2006;87(10):1298–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.016.
    1. Hidler J., Nichols D., Pelliccio M., et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009;23(1):5–13. doi: 10.1177/1545968308326632.
    1. Dias D., Laíns J., Pereira A., et al. Can we improve gait skills in chronic hemiplegics? A randomised control trial with gait trainer. Europa Medicophysica. 2007;43(4):499–504.
    1. Ng M. F. W., Tong R. K. Y., Li L. S. W. A pilot study of randomized clinical controlled trial of gait training in subacute stroke patients with partial body-weight support electromechanical gait trainer and functional electrical stimulation: six-month follow-up. Stroke. 2008;39(1):154–160. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.495705.
    1. Marquer A., Barbieri G., Pérennou D. The assessment and treatment of postural disorders in cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2014;57(2):67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.01.002.
    1. Cernak K., Stevens V., Price R., Shumway-Cook A. Locomotor training using body-weight support on a treadmill in conjunction with ongoing physical therapy in a child with severe cerebellar ataxia. Physical Therapy. 2007;88(1):88–97. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20070134.
    1. Freund J. E., Stetts D. M. Use of trunk stabilization and locomotor training in an adult with cerebellar ataxia: a single system design. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 2010;26(7):447–458. doi: 10.3109/09593980903532234.
    1. Vaz D. V., Schettino R de C., Rolla de Castro T. R., Teixeira V. R., Cavalcanti Furtado S. R., de Mello Figueiredo E. Treadmill training for ataxic patients: a single-subject experimental design. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2008;22(3):234–241. doi: 10.1177/0269215507081578.
    1. Kim T. J., Seo K. M., Kim D.-K., Kang S. H. The relationship between initial trunk performances and functional prognosis in patients with stroke. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;39(1):66–73. doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.66.
    1. Mehrholz J., Werner C., Kugler J., Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke-review. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2010;(9)
    1. Uçar D. E., Paker N., Buğdaycı D. Lokomat: a therapeutic chance for patients with chronic hemiplegia. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(3):447–453. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141054.
    1. Dobkin B. H. Progressive staging of pilot studies to improve phase III trials for motor interventions. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009;23(3):197–206. doi: 10.1177/1545968309331863.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅