An automated clinical mass spectrometric method for identification and quantification of variant and wild-type amyloid-β 1-40 and 1-42 peptides in CSF

Mari L DeMarco, Quyen Nguyen, Alice Fok, Ging-Yuek Robin Hsiung, J Grace van der Gugten, Mari L DeMarco, Quyen Nguyen, Alice Fok, Ging-Yuek Robin Hsiung, J Grace van der Gugten

Abstract

Introduction: We developed an automated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method for multiplex quantification of wild-type (wt) amyloid β (Aβ) peptides 1-40 (Aβ40) and 1-42 (Aβ42) and detection of variant Aβ peptides in cerebrospinal fluid.

Methods: The multiplex Aβ HPLC-MS/MS assay was validated in a clinically accredited laboratory following regulatory guidelines, with Aβ42 calibration assigned to the ERM/IFCC certified reference material; sequence variants were additionally multiplexed into the method.

Results: Sample preparation was fully automated on a liquid handler. The assay quantified wt-Aβ42 and wt-Aβ40 and detected sequence variants, when present, within the Aβ42 sequence.

Discussion: Extension of the HPLC-MS/MS approach for quantification of wt-Aβ42 and wt-Aβ40 to include known sequence variants increases analytical accuracy of the mass spectrometric approach and enables identification of cases of autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease. Development of an automated workflow and selection of appropriate instrumentation enabled deployment of this method in routine clinical testing.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; amyloid‐β peptides; automation; autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease; cerebrospinal fluid; certified reference material; mass spectrometry; variant.

© 2020 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
The transmembrane amyloid precursor protein (APP) is cleaved by β‐ and γ‐secretase to form the 1‐40 and 1‐42 residue isoforms of amyloid beta (Aβ). In addition to proteolytic isoforms, there are known amino acid variants, both pathogenic and benign, within the Aβ42 sequence
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Manual and automated sample preparation prior to high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated comparable performance for both (A and B) amyloid β 1‐42 (Aβ42) and (C and D) amyloid β 1‐40 (Aβ40). A and C, Shaded region represents the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the slope of the linear regression. B and D, Black dashed lines represent the 95% CI of the mean difference (solid line)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Amyloid β peptide 1‐42 (Aβ42) certified reference material (CRM)‐assigned calibrators versus calibrators pre‐CRM assignment
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The multiplex amyloid beta (Aβ) high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay enabled identification of cases (A) homozygous for wild‐type amyloid‐precursor protein (wt‐APP) alleles and (B‐J) heterozygous for an Alzheimer's disease autosomal dominant APP variant, as demonstrated by the multiple reaction monitoring chromatograms. A, In the homozygous sample, a single wt‐Aβ40 peak (blue) is observed. B‐J, In the heterozygous samples, both the wt‐Aβ40 (blue) and var‐Aβ40 (magenta) peaks are observed, the latter corresponding to the following pathogenic variants: (B) Arctic (E22G), (C) Dutch (E22Q), (D) English (H6R), (E) Flemish (A21G), (F) Iowa (D23N), (G) Italian (E22K), (H) Osaka (E22∆), (I) Piedmont (L34V), and (J) Tottori (D7N)
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
ROC curves using the multiplex amyloid β (Aβ) high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry assay for: tau/Aβ42 (dark blue), Aβ42 (green), Aβ42/Aβ40 (light blue), and Aβ40 (orange) with total tau measured by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay

References

    1. Formichi P, Battisti C, Radi E, Federico A. Cerebrospinal fluid tau, a beta, and phosphorylated tau protein for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. J Cell Physiol. 2006;208:39‐46.
    1. Bateman RJ, Aisen PS, De Strooper B, et al. Autosomal‐dominant Alzheimer's disease: a review and proposal for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011;3:1.
    1. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405‐424.
    1. Jack JCR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA‐AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's Dement. 2018;14:535‐562.
    1. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Persson S, et al. CSF biomarker variability in the Alzheimer's Association quality control program. Alzheimer's Dement. 2013;9:251‐261.
    1. Bittner T, Zetterberg H, Teunissen CE, et al. Technical performance of a novel, fully automatedm electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for the quantitation of b‐amyloid (1‐42) in human cerebrospinal fluid. Alzheimer's Dement. 2016;12:517‐526.
    1. Janelidze S, Pannee J, Mikulskis A, et al. Concordance between different amyloid immunoassays and visual amyloid positron emission tomographic assessment. JAMA Neurol. 2017.
    1. Lame ME, Chambers EE, Blatnik M. Quantitation of amyloid beta peptides Ab1‐38, Ab1‐40, and Ab1‐42 in human cerebrospinal fluid by ultra‐performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anall Biochem. 2011;419:133‐139.
    1. Shaw LM, Vanderstichele H, Knapik‐Czajka M, et al. Qualification of the analytical and clinical performance of CSF biomarker analyses in ADNI. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121:597‐609.
    1. Korecka M, Waligorska T, Figurski M, et al. Qualification of a surrogate matrix‐based absolute quantification method for Amyloid‐β42 in human cerebrospinal fluid using 2d UPLC‐tandem mass spectrometry. J Alzheimer's Dis. 2014;41:441‐451.
    1. Leinenbach A, Pannee J, Dulffer T, et al. Mass spectrometry‐based candidate reference measurement procedure for quantification of amyloid‐beta in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chem. 2014;60:987‐994.
    1. Holmes DT, Romney M, Angel P, DeMarco ML. Proteomics applications in laboratory medicine and pathology: present state and future prospects. Clin Biochem. 2020. in press.
    1. Hoofnagle AN, Wener MH. The fundamental flaws of immunoassays and potential solutions using tandem mass spectrometry. J Immunol Methods. 2009;347:3‐11.
    1. Korecka M, Figurski MJ, Landau SM, et al. Analytical and clinical performance of amyloid‐beta peptides measurements in CSF of ADNIGO/2 participants by an LC‐MS/MS reference method. Clin Chem. 2020;66:587‐597.
    1. Lin PP, Chen W, Yuan F, et al. An UHPLC–MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of human amyloid beta peptides Aβ1‐38, Aβ1‐40 and Aβ1‐42 in cerebrospinal fluid using micro‐elution solid phase extraction. J Chromatogr B Analyst Technol Biomed Life Sci 2017;1070:82‐91.
    1. Weber DM, Tran D, Goldman SM, et al. High‐throughput mass spectrometry assay for quantifying β‐Amyloid 40 and 42 in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chem. 2020;65:1572‐1580.
    1. Drees JC, Stone JA, Reamer CR, et al. Falsely undetectable TSH in a cohort of South Asian euthyroid patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:1171‐1179.
    1. Servant‐Delmas A, Mercier‐Darty M, Ly TD, et al. Variable capacity of 13 hepatitis B virus surface antigen assays for the detection of HBsAg mutants in blood samples. J Clin Virol. 2012;53:338‐345.
    1. Hendrickson B, Kamili S, Timmons T, Iwen PC, Pedati C, Safranek T. Notes from the field: false‐negative hepatitis B surface antigen test results in a hemodialysis patient—Nebraska, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:311‐312.
    1. Plantier JC, Djemai M, Lemée V, et al. Census and analysis of persistent false‐negative results in serological diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:2906.
    1. CLSI . Evaluation of Precision of Quantitative Measurement Procedures; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP‐5A. 3rd ed Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.
    1. CLSI . Liquid Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry Methods; Approved Guideline. CLSI document C62‐A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.
    1. CLSI . Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EPo6‐A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2003.
    1. Kuhlmann J, Boulo S, Andreasson U, et al. Certification report: the certification of Amyloid β1‐42 in CSF in ERM®‐DA480/IFCC, ERM®‐DA481/IFCC and ERM®‐DA482/IFCC Luxembourg2017.
    1. Hoofnagle AN, Whiteaker JR, Carr SA, et al. Recommendations for the generation, quantification, storage, and handling of peptides used for mass spectrometry–based assays. Clin Chem. 2016;62:48.
    1. Korecka M, Waligorska T, Figurski M, et al. Qualification of a surrogate matrix‐based absolute quantification method for amyloid‐beta(42) in human cerebrospinal fluid using 2D UPLC‐tandem mass spectrometry. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;41:441‐451.
    1. Shaw LM, Hansson O, Manuilova E, et al. Method comparison study of the Elecsys® β‐Amyloid (1‐42) CSF assay versus comparator assays and LC‐MS/MS. Clin Biochem. 2019;72:7‐14.
    1. Janelidze S, Pannee J, Mikulskis A, et al. Concordance between different amyloid immunoassays and visual amyloid positron emission tomographic assessment. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:1492‐1501.
    1. Jack Jr CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA‐AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's Dement. 2018;14:535‐562.
    1. Ketha H, Singh RJ. Clinical assays for quantitation of insulin‐like‐growth‐factor‐1 (IGF1). Methods. 2015;81:93‐98.
    1. Goldman JS, Hahn SE, Catania JW, et al. Genetic counseling and testing for Alzheimer disease: joint practice guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Genet Med. 2011;13:597‐605.
    1. Alexander EL, Butler RK, Guimond C, Butler B, Sadovnick AD. Accuracy of reported family history and effectiveness of medical record requests in genetic counseling for Alzheimer disease. J Genet Couns. 2011;20:129‐135.
    1. Rovelet‐Lecrux A, Charbonnier C, Wallon D, et al. De novo deleterious genetic variations target a biological network centered on Aβ peptide in early‐onset Alzheimer disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:1046‐1056.
    1. Butler R, Dwosh E, Beattie BL, et al. Genetic counseling for early‐onset familial Alzheimer disease in large aboriginal kindred from a remote community in British Columbia: unique challenges and possible solutions. J Genet Couns. 2011;20:136‐142.
    1. Jia L, Fu Y, Shen L, et al. PSEN1, PSEN2, and APP mutations in 404 Chinese pedigrees with familial Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's Dement. 2020;16:178‐191.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅