Heterozygous STUB1 missense variants cause ataxia, cognitive decline, and STUB1 mislocalization

Dong-Hui Chen, Caitlin Latimer, Mayumi Yagi, Mesaki Kenneth Ndugga-Kabuye, Elyana Heigham, Suman Jayadev, James S Meabon, Christopher M Gomez, C Dirk Keene, David G Cook, Wendy H Raskind, Thomas D Bird, Dong-Hui Chen, Caitlin Latimer, Mayumi Yagi, Mesaki Kenneth Ndugga-Kabuye, Elyana Heigham, Suman Jayadev, James S Meabon, Christopher M Gomez, C Dirk Keene, David G Cook, Wendy H Raskind, Thomas D Bird

Abstract

Objective: To identify the genetic cause of autosomal dominant ataxia complicated by behavioral abnormalities, cognitive decline, and autism in 2 families and to characterize brain neuropathologic signatures of dominant STUB1-related ataxia and investigate the effects of pathogenic variants on STUB1 localization.

Methods: Clinical and research-based exome sequencing was used to identify the causative variants for autosomal dominant ataxia in 2 families. Gross and microscopic neuropathologic evaluations were performed on the brains of 4 affected individuals in these families.

Results: Mutations in STUB1 have been primarily associated with childhood-onset autosomal recessive ataxia, but here we report heterozygous missense variants in STUB1 (p.Ile53Thr and p.The37Leu) confirming the recent reports of autosomal dominant inheritance. Cerebellar atrophy on imaging and cognitive deficits often preceded ataxia. Unique neuropathologic examination of the 4 brains showed the marked loss of Purkinje cells (PCs) without microscopic evidence of significant pathology outside the cerebellum. The normal pattern of polarized somatodendritic STUB1 protein expression in PCs was lost, resulting in aberrant STUB1 localization in the distal PC dendritic arbors.

Conclusions: This study confirms a dominant inheritance pattern in STUB1-ataxia in addition to a recessive one and documents its association with cognitive and behavioral disability, including autism. In the most extensive analysis of cerebellar pathology in this disease, we demonstrate disruption of STUB1 protein in PCs as part of the underlying pathogenesis.

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.

Figures

Figure 1. Four generation pedigrees of 2…
Figure 1. Four generation pedigrees of 2 families with hereditary cerebellar ataxia and cognitive disability
If alive, current age in years is shown below the symbol. / = deceased; A = brain autopsy; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; black symbol = affected with ataxia; d = age at death. The variant or wild-type STUB1 allele is shown for individuals who were tested.
Figure 2. Neuroimaging
Figure 2. Neuroimaging
(A) MRI of patient III-1 in family A at 53 years of age showing marked midline cerebellar atrophy, mildly enlarged lateral ventricle, and normal corpus callosum. (B) MRI of patient A IV-1 at 32 years of age showing marked midline cerebellar atrophy before the onset of ataxia but having cognitive disability and autism spectrum disorder. (C and D) MRI of patient III-2 in family B at 48 years of age showing midline (C) and lateral (D) cerebellar atrophy.
Figure 3. Ataxia-related variants in STUB1
Figure 3. Ataxia-related variants in STUB1
(A) STUB1 gene showing reported variants associated with autosomal dominant and recessive ataxias and the corresponding locations in the protein. Colors indicate the TPR (turquoise), coiled-coil (purple), and E3 ubiquitin ligase (U-box) domains in STUB1. Bold = heterozygous autosomal dominant variants reported by Genis et al and De Michele et al and in this report (in red). Arrow = an intronic mutation at the donor splice site of exon 4. (B) Diagram depicts the location of the p.Ile53Thr (red amino acid) and p.Phe37Leu (yellow amino acid) missense variants within a 3-D model of a STUB1 homodimer (the functional isoform). STUB1 was modeled with PyMOL (pymol.org) using the data from the protein data bank (rcsb.org, PDB ID#2C2L). TPR = tetratricopeptide repeat.
Figure 4. Microscopic neuropathology
Figure 4. Microscopic neuropathology
Microscopic sections of the patients from both families showing marked cerebellar atrophy with thinning of the folia (H&E/LFB low magnification) and Purkinje cell (PC) loss (H&E/LFB high magnification). The loss of PCs is also highlighted by the empty baskets noted on Bielschowsky silver stain and by the severe reduction in calbindin-positive fibers (calbindin and GFAP immunostaining available on request). H&E = hematoxylin and eosin.
Figure 5. Loss of polarized STUB1 expression…
Figure 5. Loss of polarized STUB1 expression in Purkinje cells in patients with STUB1-cerebellar ataxia
Immunostaining was performed with antibodies to STUB1 (pseudocolored purple), EAAT4 (green), and calbindin (red), and all scanning acquisition and postprocessing parameters were carried out identically among the cases about the controls in each panel. In 3 different normal control individuals (A.a–A.d, B.a–B.d, C.a–C.d), STUB1 immunoreactivity was uniformly localized primarily in PC cell bodies and proximal dendrites, with little expression in distal PC dendritic arbors. (A and B) Family A with STUB1-Ile53Thr. Loss of STUB1 polarization results in aberrant expression in distal PC dendritic arbors and cell bodies in patients III-1 (A.e–A.h), IV-1 (B.e–B.h), and II-2 (B.i–B.l). Scale bars = 100 μm. (C) Family B with STUB1-Phe37Leu. In individual III-2, STUB1 was aberrantly expressed in PC distal arbors (C.e–C.h). Scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 6. STUB1 expression pattern in Purkinje…
Figure 6. STUB1 expression pattern in Purkinje cells in a number of non-STUB1-associated ataxias and cerebellar degeneration
In a normal individual (A–D), STUB1 immunoreactivity was expressed mostly in PC cell bodies and proximal dendrites (pseudocolored purple). Calbindin (red) and EAAT4 (green) immunostained PC bodies and dendrites. STUB1 localization appeared normal in PCs from SCA5 (E–H) and SCA3 (I–L). In an SCA7 case, STUB1 expression was aberrantly localized in distal PC dendritic arbors (M–P). Scale bars = 100 μm.

References

    1. Bird T. Hereditary ataxia overview. In: GeneReviews at GeneTests: Medical Genetics Information Resource [Database Online] 1993-2019. Seattle: University of Washington; 2019.
    1. Depondt C, Donatello S, Simonis N, et al. . Autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia of adult onset due to STUB1 mutations. Neurology 2014;82:1749–1750.
    1. Kanack AJ, Newsom OJ, Scaglione KM. Most mutations that cause spinocerebellar ataxia autosomal recessive type 16 (SCAR16) destabilize the protein quality-control E3 ligase CHIP. J Biol Chem 2018;293:2735–2743.
    1. Bettencourt C, de Yebenes JG, Lopez-Sendon JL, et al. . Clinical and neuropathological features of spastic ataxia in a Spanish family with novel compound heterozygous mutations in STUB1. Cerebellum 2015;14:378–381.
    1. Genis D, Ortega-Cubero S, San Nicolas H, et al. . Heterozygous STUB1 mutation causes familial ataxia with cognitive affective syndrome (SCA48). Neurology 2018;91:e1988–e1998.
    1. De Michele G, Lieto M, Galatolo D, et al. . Spinocerebellar ataxia 48 presenting with ataxia associated with cognitive, psychiatric, and extrapyramidal features: a report of two Italian families. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019;65:91–96.
    1. McDonough H, Patterson C. CHIP: a link between the chaperone and proteasome systems. Cell Stress Chaperones 2003;8:303–308.
    1. Chen D-H, Below JE, Shimamura A, et al. . Ataxia-pancytopenia syndrome is caused by missense mutations in SAMD9L. Am J Hum Genet 2016;98:1146–1158.
    1. Davydov EV, Goode DL, Sirota M, Cooper GM, Sidow A, Batzoglou S. Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6:e1001025.
    1. Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3812–3814.
    1. Sunyaev S, Ramensky V, Koch I, Lathe W III, Kondrashov AS, Bork P. Prediction of deleterious human alleles. Hum Mol Genet 2001;10:591–597.
    1. Ramensky V, Bork P, Sunyaev S. Human non-synonymous SNPs: server and survey. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:3894–3900.
    1. Kircher M, Witten DM, Jain P, O'Roak BJ, Cooper GM, Shendure J. A general framework for estimating the relative pathogenicity of human genetic variants. Nat Genet 2014;46:310–315.
    1. Chen YZ, Matsushita MM, Robertson P, et al. . Autosomal dominant familial dyskinesia and facial myokymia: single exome sequencing identifies a mutation in adenylyl cyclase 5. Arch Neurol 2012;69:630–635.
    1. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised (WAIS-R). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 1981.
    1. Ruano L, Melo C, Silva MC, Coutinho P. The global epidemiology of hereditary ataxia and spastic paraplegia: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Neuroepidemiology 2014;42:174–183.
    1. Pakdaman Y, Sanchez-Guixe M, Kleppe R, et al. . In vitro characterization of six STUB1 variants in spinocerebellar ataxia 16 reveals altered structural properties for the encoded CHIP proteins. Biosci Rep 2017;37:BSR20170251.
    1. Wang J, Al-Ouran R, Hu Y, et al. . MARRVEL: integration of human and model organism genetic resources to facilitate functional annotation of the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 2017;100:843–853.
    1. Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A, et al. . VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics 2018;35:1978–1980.
    1. Li J, Shi L, Zhang K, et al. . VarCards: an integrated genetic and clinical database for coding variants in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:D1039–D1048.
    1. Turkgenc B, Sanlidag B, Eker A, et al. . STUB1 polyadenylation signal variant AACAAA does not affect polyadenylation but decreases STUB1 translation causing SCAR16. Hum Mutat 2018;39:1344–1348.
    1. Bar-Peled O, Ben-Hur H, Biegon A, et al. . Distribution of glutamate transporter subtypes during human brain development. J Neurochem 1997;69:2571–2580.
    1. Dehnes Y, Chaudhry FA, Ullensvang K, Lehre KP, Storm-Mathisen J, Danbolt NC. The glutamate transporter EAAT4 in rat cerebellar Purkinje cells: a glutamate-gated chloride channel concentrated near the synapse in parts of the dendritic membrane facing astroglia. J Neurosci 1998;18:3606–3619.
    1. Chen DH, Meneret A, Friedman JR, et al. . ADCY5-related dyskinesia: broader spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations. Neurology 2015;85:2026–2035.
    1. Barrett MJ, Williams ES, Chambers C, Dhamija R. Autosomal recessive inheritance of ADCY5-related generalized dystonia and myoclonus. Neurol Genet 2017;3:193.
    1. Lise S, Clarkson Y, Perkins E, et al. . Recessive mutations in SPTBN2 implicate beta-III spectrin in both cognitive and motor development. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1003074.
    1. Morimoto Y, Yoshida S, Kinoshita A, et al. . Nonsense mutation in CFAP43 causes normal-pressure hydrocephalus with ciliary abnormalities. Neurology 2019;92:e2364–e2374.
    1. Rossi M, Anheim M, Durr A, et al. . The genetic nomenclature of recessive cerebellar ataxias. Mov Disord 2018;33:1056–1076.
    1. Marras C, Lang A, van de Warrenburg BP, et al. . Nomenclature of genetic movement disorders: recommendations of the international Parkinson and movement disorder society task force. Mov Disord 2016;31:436–457.
    1. Shi Y, Wang J, Li JD, et al. . Identification of CHIP as a novel causative gene for autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia. PLoS One 2013;8:e81884.
    1. Heimdal K, Sanchez-Guixe M, Aukrust I, et al. . STUB1 mutations in autosomal recessive ataxias—evidence for mutation-specific clinical heterogeneity. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014;9:146.
    1. Shi CH, Schisler JC, Rubel CE, et al. . Ataxia and hypogonadism caused by the loss of ubiquitin ligase activity of the U box protein CHIP. Hum Mol Genet 2014;23:1013–1024.
    1. Synofzik M, Schule R, Schulze M, et al. . Phenotype and frequency of STUB1 mutations: next-generation screenings in Caucasian ataxia and spastic paraplegia cohorts. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2014;9:57.
    1. Webb SJ, Sparks BF, Friedman SD, et al. . Cerebellar vermal volumes and behavioral correlates in children with autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Res 2009;172:61–67.
    1. Skefos J, Cummings C, Enzer K, et al. . Regional alterations in purkinje cell density in patients with autism. PLoS One 2014;9:e81255.
    1. Wang SS, Kloth AD, Badura A. The cerebellum, sensitive periods, and autism. Neuron 2014;83:518–532.
    1. Schmahmann JD. The cerebellum and cognition. Neurosci Lett 2019;688:62–75.
    1. Liang KJ, Carlson ES. Resistance, vulnerability and resilience: a review of the cognitive cerebellum in aging and neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
    1. Nikolay R, Wiederkehr T, Rist W, Kramer G, Mayer MP, Bukau B. Dimerization of the human E3 ligase CHIP via a coiled-coil domain is essential for its activity. J Biol Chem 2004;279:2673–2678.
    1. Al-Ramahi I, Lam YC, Chen HK, et al. . CHIP protects from the neurotoxicity of expanded and wild-type ataxin-1 and promotes their ubiquitination and degradation. J Biol Chem 2006;281:26714–26724.
    1. Scaglione KM, Zavodszky E, Todi SV, et al. . Ube2w and ataxin-3 coordinately regulate the ubiquitin ligase CHIP. Mol Cell 2011;43:599–612.
    1. Dickey CA, Yue M, Lin WL, et al. . Deletion of the ubiquitin ligase CHIP leads to the accumulation, but not the aggregation, of both endogenous phospho- and caspase-3-cleaved tau species. J Neurosci 2006;26:6985–6996.
    1. Wechsler D. WMS-R. Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corp: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1987.
    1. King FW, Bird TD. Trail making test: norms for college males and relationship to scholastic aptitude. Percept Mot Skills 1965;21:199–206.
    1. Woodcock RW, Johnson B. Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery–Revised. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside; 1989.
    1. Woodcock R, Johnson B. Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised Tests of Achievement. Chicago: Riverside Publishing; 1990.
    1. Sheslow D, Adams W. Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning (WRAML). Wilmington, DE: Jastak; 1990.
    1. Grant DA, Berg E. A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in Weigl-type card-sorting problem. J Exp Psychol 1948;38:404–411.
    1. Hooper H. Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1983.
    1. Wiens AN, Tindall AG, Crossen JR. California verbal learning test: a normative data study. J Clin Neuropsychologist 1994;8:75–90.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅