Polygenic type 2 diabetes prediction at the limit of common variant detection

Jason L Vassy, Marie-France Hivert, Bianca Porneala, Marco Dauriz, Jose C Florez, Josée Dupuis, David S Siscovick, Myriam Fornage, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Claude Bouchard, James B Meigs, Jason L Vassy, Marie-France Hivert, Bianca Porneala, Marco Dauriz, Jose C Florez, Josée Dupuis, David S Siscovick, Myriam Fornage, Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik, Claude Bouchard, James B Meigs

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) may have reached their limit of detecting common type 2 diabetes (T2D)-associated genetic variation. We evaluated the performance of current polygenic T2D prediction. Using data from the Framingham Offspring (FOS) and the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) studies, we tested three hypotheses: 1) a 62-locus genotype risk score (GRSt) improves T2D prediction compared with previous less inclusive GRSt; 2) separate GRS for β-cell (GRSβ) and insulin resistance (GRSIR) independently predict T2D; and 3) the relationships between T2D and GRSt, GRSβ, or GRSIR do not differ between blacks and whites. Among 1,650 young white adults in CARDIA, 820 young black adults in CARDIA, and 3,471 white middle-aged adults in FOS, cumulative T2D incidence was 5.9%, 14.4%, and 12.9%, respectively, over 25 years. The 62-locus GRSt was significantly associated with incident T2D in all three groups. In FOS but not CARDIA, the 62-locus GRSt improved the model C statistic (0.698 and 0.726 for models without and with GRSt, respectively; P < 0.001) but did not materially improve risk reclassification in either study. Results were similar among blacks compared with whites. The GRSβ but not GRSIR predicted incident T2D among FOS and CARDIA whites. At the end of the era of common variant discovery for T2D, polygenic scores can predict T2D in whites and blacks but do not outperform clinical models. Further optimization of polygenic prediction may require novel analytic methods, including less common as well as functional variants.

© 2014 by the American Diabetes Association.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
T2D-associated genetic loci. Loci on the x-axis are ordered by inclusion in published 17-, 40- and 62-SNP GRS. Black bars (left y-axis) indicate published DIAGRAMv3 odds ratio (OR) for T2D per risk allele at each locus. The black line plots the T2D OR in the FOS per allele increase in a GRS containing the loci up to that point on the x-axis. Points with error bars plot the C statistics (95% CI) from pooled logistic regression models for T2D in FOS including 17-, 40-, and 62-SNP GRS in demographic and clinical models. Loci used in separate β-cell and IR GRS in the present analyses are also indicated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for models predicting incident T2D with and without a 62-locus GRS among the FOS (A) and white (B) and black (C) young adults in the CARDIA Study. Graphs plot the sensitivity vs. (1 − specificity) for diabetes at each possible model cut point. The area under a ROC curve corresponds to the C statistic of that model. The full clinical model is adjusted for age, sex, parental diabetes (yes vs. no), BMI, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, HDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels.

References

    1. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, et al. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 2002;346:393–403
    1. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, et al. Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group . Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1343–1350
    1. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group . The 10-year cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for diabetes prevention: an intent-to-treat analysis of the DPP/DPPOS. Diabetes Care 2012;35:723–730
    1. Meigs JB, Shrader P, Sullivan LM, et al. . Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2208–2219
    1. Lyssenko V, Jonsson A, Almgren P, et al. . Clinical risk factors, DNA variants, and the development of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2220–2232
    1. Talmud PJ, Hingorani AD, Cooper JA, et al. . Utility of genetic and non-genetic risk factors in prediction of type 2 diabetes: Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ 2010;340:b4838–b4838
    1. van Hoek M, Dehghan A, Witteman JC, et al. . Predicting type 2 diabetes based on polymorphisms from genome-wide association studies: a population-based study. Diabetes 2008;57:3122–3128
    1. Vassy JL, Dasmahapatra PD, Meigs JB, et al. . Genotype prediction of adult type 2 diabetes from adolescence in a multiracial population. Pediatrics 2012;130:e1235–e1242
    1. Vassy JL, Durant NH, Kabagambe EK, et al. . A genotype risk score predicts type 2 diabetes from young adulthood: the CARDIA study. Diabetologia 2012;55:2604–2612
    1. Wilson PW, Meigs JB, Sullivan L, Fox CS, Nathan DM, D’Agostino RB, Sr. Prediction of incident diabetes mellitus in middle-aged adults: the Framingham Offspring Study. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1068–1074
    1. Meigs JB, Cupples LA, Wilson PW. Parental transmission of type 2 diabetes: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes 2000;49:2201–2207
    1. Morris AP, Voight BF, Teslovich TM, et al. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) Investigators. Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) Consortium. Asian Genetic Epidemiology Network–Type 2 Diabetes (AGEN-T2D) Consortium. South Asian Type 2 Diabetes (SAT2D) Consortium. DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium . Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 2012;44:981–990
    1. Hunt KA, Mistry V, Bockett NA, et al. . Negligible impact of rare autoimmune-locus coding-region variants on missing heritability. Nature 2013;498:232–235
    1. Morrison AC, Voorman A, Johnson AD, et al. Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genetic Epidemiology (CHARGE) Consortium . Whole-genome sequence-based analysis of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Nat Genet 2013;45:899–901
    1. Chatterjee N, Wheeler B, Sampson J, Hartge P, Chanock SJ, Park JH. Projecting the performance of risk prediction based on polygenic analyses of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 2013;45:400–405, 405e1–3
    1. de Miguel-Yanes JM, Shrader P, Pencina MJ, et al. MAGIC Investigators. DIAGRAM+ Investigators . Genetic risk reclassification for type 2 diabetes by age below or above 50 years using 40 type 2 diabetes risk single nucleotide polymorphisms. Diabetes Care 2011;34:121–125
    1. Ingelsson E, Langenberg C, Hivert MF, et al. MAGIC investigators . Detailed physiologic characterization reveals diverse mechanisms for novel genetic Loci regulating glucose and insulin metabolism in humans. Diabetes 2010;59:1266–1275
    1. Dimas AS, Lagou V, Barker A, et al. ; MAGIC Investigators. Impact of type 2 diabetes susceptibility variants on quantitative glycemic traits reveals mechanistic heterogeneity. Diabetes 2014;63:2158–2171
    1. Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol 1979;110:281–290
    1. Cutter GR, Burke GL, Dyer AR, et al. . Cardiovascular risk factors in young adults. The CARDIA baseline monograph. Control Clin Trials 1991;12(Suppl.):1S–77S
    1. Friedman GD, Cutter GR, Donahue RP, et al. . CARDIA: study design, recruitment, and some characteristics of the examined subjects. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:1105–1116
    1. Meigs JB, Nathan DM, Wilson PW, Cupples LA, Singer DE. Metabolic risk factors worsen continuously across the spectrum of nondiabetic glucose tolerance. The Framingham Offspring Study. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:524–533
    1. Murabito JM, Nam BH, D’Agostino RB, Sr, Lloyd-Jones DM, O’Donnell CJ, Wilson PW. Accuracy of offspring reports of parental cardiovascular disease history: the Framingham Offspring Study. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:434–440
    1. Bild DE, Jacobs DR, Jr, Liu K, et al. . Seven-year trends in plasma low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol in young adults: the CARDIA Study. Ann Epidemiol 1996;6:235–245
    1. Lettre G, Palmer CD, Young T, et al. . Genome-wide association study of coronary heart disease and its risk factors in 8,090 African Americans: the NHLBI CARe Project. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1001300.
    1. Lemaitre RN, Tanaka T, Tang W, et al. . Genetic loci associated with plasma phospholipid n-3 fatty acids: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from the CHARGE Consortium. PLoS Genet 2011;7:e1002193.
    1. Gabriel SB, Schaffner SF, Nguyen H, et al. . The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 2002;296:2225–2229
    1. Manning AK, Hivert MF, Scott RA, et al. DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium. Multiple Tissue Human Expression Resource (MUTHER) Consortium . A genome-wide approach accounting for body mass index identifies genetic variants influencing fasting glycemic traits and insulin resistance. Nat Genet 2012;44:659–669
    1. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Sr, Steyerberg EW. Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 2011;30:11–21
    1. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Sr, D’Agostino RB, Jr, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 2008;27:157–172; discussion 207–212
    1. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–845
    1. Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Stat Med 2004;23:2109–2123
    1. Wray NR, Yang J, Hayes BJ, Price AL, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat Rev Genet 2013;14:507–515
    1. Voight BF, Scott LJ, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. MAGIC investigators. GIANT Consortium Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibilty loci identified through large-scale association analysis. Nat Genet 2010;42:579–589
    1. Perry JR, Voight BF, Yengo L, et al. MAGIC. DIAGRAM Consortium. GIANT Consortium . Stratifying type 2 diabetes cases by BMI identifies genetic risk variants in LAMA1 and enrichment for risk variants in lean compared to obese cases. PLoS Genet 2012;8:e1002741.
    1. Palmer ND, McDonough CW, Hicks PJ, et al. DIAGRAM Consortium. MAGIC Investigators . A genome-wide association search for type 2 diabetes genes in African Americans. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e29202.
    1. Lewis JP, Palmer ND, Hicks PJ, et al. . Association analysis in african americans of European-derived type 2 diabetes single nucleotide polymorphisms from whole-genome association studies. Diabetes 2008;57:2220–2225
    1. Cooke JN, Ng MC, Palmer ND, et al. . Genetic risk assessment of type 2 diabetes-associated polymorphisms in African Americans. Diabetes Care 2012;35:287–292
    1. Liu CT, Ng MC, Rybin D, et al. . Transferability and fine-mapping of glucose and insulin quantitative trait loci across populations: CARe, the Candidate Gene Association Resource. Diabetologia 2012;55:2970–2984
    1. Bao W, Hu FB, Rong S, et al. . Predicting risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus with genetic risk models on the basis of established genome-wide association markers: a systematic review. Am J Epidemiol 2013;178:1197–1207
    1. Abraham G, Kowalczyk A, Zobel J, Inouye M. Performance and robustness of penalized and unpenalized methods for genetic prediction of complex human disease. Genet Epidemiol 2013;37:184–195
    1. Che R, Motsinger-Reif AA. A new explained-variance based genetic risk score for predictive modeling of disease risk. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2012;11:15.
    1. Aschard H, Chen J, Cornelis MC, Chibnik LB, Karlson EW, Kraft P. Inclusion of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions unlikely to dramatically improve risk prediction for complex diseases. Am J Hum Genet 2012;90:962–972

Source: PubMed

3
订阅