Who needs bereavement support? A population based survey of bereavement risk and support need

Samar M Aoun, Lauren J Breen, Denise A Howting, Bruce Rumbold, Beverley McNamara, Desley Hegney, Samar M Aoun, Lauren J Breen, Denise A Howting, Bruce Rumbold, Beverley McNamara, Desley Hegney

Abstract

This study identifies and describes the profiles of bereavement risk and support needs of a community sample in Australia and tests the fit of the data with the three-tiered public health model for bereavement support. Family members who were bereaved 6-24 months prior to the survey and who were clients of four funeral providers participated (May-July 2013). A postal survey was used to collect information about bereaved people's experience of caring and perceived satisfaction with any bereavement support provided. The questionnaire included a validated risk assessment screening measure for Prolonged Grief Disorder (PG-13). A total of 678 bereaved people responded. The model predicted that 60% of the sample would be low risk, 30% moderate risk, and 10% high risk. Actual figures were very close at 58.4%, 35.2% and 6.4% respectively. The analysis of the demographic characteristics, experience and impact of caring and bereavement, and satisfaction with support received from a variety of sources revealed differential experiences and needs that align with the expectation of low, moderate, and high bereavement support need, as articulated in the public health model. This is the first empirical test of the public health model of bereavement support. As there is a lack of clear evidence to guide development and allocation of bereavement support programs, the findings have the potential to inform the ability of services, community organizations and informal networks to prioritize care according to each level of bereavement need. This is essential to achieve cost-effective and equitable resource allocation.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Sources of bereavement support accessed…
Fig 1. Sources of bereavement support accessed grouped according to types of support*.
*Only categories with statistically significant differences (p

Fig 2. The Public Health Model: Predicted…

Fig 2. The Public Health Model: Predicted (in brackets) and Actual Proportions for the three…

Fig 2. The Public Health Model: Predicted (in brackets) and Actual Proportions for the three risk groups.
Fig 2. The Public Health Model: Predicted…
Fig 2. The Public Health Model: Predicted (in brackets) and Actual Proportions for the three risk groups.

References

    1. Breen LJ, O'Connor M. The fundamental paradox in the grief literature: a critical reflection. Omega (Westport). 2007; 55: 199–218.
    1. Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, et al. Prolonged grief disorder: Psychometric validation of criteria proposed for DSM-V and ICD-11. PLoS Medicine. 2009; 6: e1000121 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000121
    1. Shear MK, Simon N, Wall M, Zisook S, Neimeyer R, et al. Complicated grief and related bereavement issues for DSM-5. Depress Anxiety. 2011; 28: 103–117. 10.1002/da.20780
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5 ed. Washington, DC: APA; 2013.
    1. Maercker A, Brewin CR, Bryant RA, Cloitre M, Reed GM, et al. Proposals for mental disorders specifically associated with stress in the International Classification of Diseases-11. Lancet. 2013; 381: 1683–1685. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62191-6
    1. Ogden SP, Simmonds JG. Psychologists' and counsellors' perspectives on prolonged grief disorder and its inclusion in diagnostic manuals. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 2013; 14: 212–219.
    1. Penman EL, Breen LJ, Hewitt LY, Prigerson HG. Public attitudes about normal and pathological grief. Death Stud. 2014; 38: 510–516. 10.1080/07481187.2013.873839
    1. Lobb EA, Kristjanson LJ, Aoun SM, Monterosso L, Halkett GK, et al. Predictors of complicated grief: a systematic review of empirical studies. Death Stud. 2010; 34: 673–698.
    1. Bryant RA, Kenny L, Joscelyne A, Rawson N, Maccallum F, et al. Treating prolonged grief disorder: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014.
    1. Currier JM, Neimeyer RA, Berman JS. The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for bereaved persons: A comprehensive quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin. 2008; 134: 648–661. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.648
    1. Rosner R, Kruse J, Hagl M. A meta-analysis of interventions for bereaved children and adolescents. Death Studies. 2010; 34: 99–136.
    1. Regehr C, Sussman T. Intersections between grief and trauma: Toward an empirically based model for treating traumatic grief. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention. 2004; 4: 289–309.
    1. Lichtenthal WG, Nilsson M, Kissane DW, Breitbart W, Kacel E, et al. Underutilization of mental health services among bereaved caregivers with prolonged grief disorder. Psychiatr Serv. 2011; 62: 1225–1229. 10.1176/appi.ps.62.10.1225
    1. Wright AA, Keating NL, Balboni TA, Matulonis UA, Block SD, et al. Place of death: correlations with quality of life of patients with cancer and predictors of bereaved caregivers' mental health. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 4457–4464. 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3863
    1. Prigerson H, Ahmed I, Silverman GK, Saxena AK, Maciejewski PK, et al. Rates and risks of complicated grief among psychiatric clinic patients in Karachi, Pakistan. Death Stud. 2002; 26: 781–792.
    1. Barry LC, Kasl SV, Prigerson HG. Psychiatric disorders among bereaved persons: the role of perceived circumstances of death and preparedness for death. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002; 10: 447–457.
    1. Commonwealth of Australia (2010). National Palliative Care Strategy. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
    1. Hall C, Hudson P, Boughey A (2012). Bereavement support standards for specialist palliative care services In: Do Health, editor. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria.
    1. National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization (2008). Guidelines for bereavement care in hospice 2 ed. Alexandria, VA: National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization.
    1. Palliative Care Australia (2005). Standards for providing quality palliative care for all Australians Deakin West, ACT: Palliative Care Australia.
    1. World Health Organization (2007). WHO guide for effective programmes: Palliative care Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Palliative Care Australia (2010). National Standards Assessment Program: National quality report Deakin West, ACT: Palliative Care Australia.
    1. Abbott J, O'Connor M, Payne S. An Australian survey of palliative care and hospice bereavement services. Australian Journal of Cancer Nursing. 2008; 9: 12–17.
    1. Agnew A, Manktelow R, Taylor B, Jones L. Bereavement needs assessment in specialist palliative care: a review of the literature. Palliative Medicine. 2010; 24: 46–59. 10.1177/0269216309107013
    1. Foliart DE, Clausen M, Siljestrom C. Bereavement practices among California hospices: results of a statewide survey. Death Stud. 2001; 25: 461–467.
    1. Mather MA, Good PD, Cavenagh JD, Ravenscroft PJ. Survey of bereavement support provided by Australian palliative care services. Medical Journal of Australia. 2008; 188: 228–230.
    1. Breen LJ. The effect of caring on post-bereavement outcome: Research gaps and practice priorities. Progress in Palliative Care. 2012; 20: 27–30.
    1. Breen LJ, Aoun SM, O'Connor M, Rumbold B. Bridging the gaps in palliative care bereavement support: An international perspective. Death Studies. 2013; 38: 54–61. 10.1080/07481187.2012.725451
    1. Aoun SM, Breen LJ, O'Connor M, Rumbold B, Nordstrom C. A public health approach to bereavement support services in palliative care. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 2012; 36: 14–16. 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00825.x
    1. Aoun SM, Breen LJ, Rumbold B, Howting D. Reported experiences of bereavement support in Western Australia: a pilot study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014; 38: 473–479. 10.1111/1753-6405.12177
    1. Rumbold B, Aoun S. Bereavement and palliative care: A public health perspective. Progress in Palliative Care. 2014; 22: 131–135.
    1. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Hall S, Koffman J, McCrone P, et al. (2012). Factors influencing participation in a cancer mortality followback survey. P447. Poster session presented at: 7th World Research Congress of the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC), 7–9 June 2012. Trondheim, Norway.
    1. Hunt K, Shlomo N, Addington-Hall J. Participant recruitment in sensitive surveys: a comparative trial of 'opt in' versus 'opt out' approaches. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2013; 13: 3 10.1186/1471-2288-13-3
    1. Koffman J, Higginson IJ, Hall S, Riley J, McCrone P, et al. Bereaved relatives' views about participating in cancer research. Palliat Med. 2012; 26: 379–383. 10.1177/0269216311405091
    1. Zhang B, El-Jawahri A, Prigerson HG. Update on bereavement research: evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of complicated bereavement. J Palliat Med. 2006; 9: 1188–1203.
    1. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277–1288.
    1. Aoun S, O'Connor M, Breen L (2012). Palliative care bereavement support scoping study: Consultations with service providers Perth: WA Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care, Curtin University.
    1. Relf M, Lines C (2005). Who uses bereavement care? 7th International Conference on Grief and Bereavement in Contemporary Society. London, UK.
    1. Mayland CR, Williams EM, Ellershaw JE. Assessing quality of care for the dying: the development and initial validation of a postal self-completion questionnaire for bereaved relatives. Palliat Med. 2012; 26: 897–907.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅