Transplantation of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood promotes functional recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury in Wistar rats

L P Rodrigues, D Iglesias, F C Nicola, D Steffens, L Valentim, A Witczak, G Zanatta, M Achaval, P Pranke, C A Netto, L P Rodrigues, D Iglesias, F C Nicola, D Steffens, L Valentim, A Witczak, G Zanatta, M Achaval, P Pranke, C A Netto

Abstract

Cell transplantation is a promising experimental treatment for spinal cord injury. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood in promoting functional recovery when transplanted after a contusion spinal cord injury. Female Wistar rats (12 weeks old) were submitted to spinal injury with a MASCIS impactor and divided into 4 groups: control, surgical control, spinal cord injury, and one cell-treated lesion group. Mononuclear cells from umbilical cord blood of human male neonates were transplanted in two experiments: a) 1 h after surgery, into the injury site at a concentration of 5 x 10(6) cells diluted in 10 µL 0.9% NaCl (N = 8-10 per group); b) into the cisterna magna, 9 days after lesion at a concentration of 5 x 10(6) cells diluted in 150 µL 0.9% NaCl (N = 12-14 per group). The transplanted animals were immunosuppressed with cyclosporin-A (10 mg/kg per day). The BBB scale was used to evaluate motor behavior and the injury site was analyzed with immunofluorescent markers to label human transplanted cells, oligodendrocytes, neurons, and astrocytes. Spinal cord injury rats had 25% loss of cord tissue and cell treatment did not affect lesion extension. Transplanted cells survived in the injured area for 6 weeks after the procedure and both transplanted groups showed better motor recovery than the untreated ones (P < 0.05). The transplantation of mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord blood promoted functional recovery with no evidence of cell differentiation.

Figures

Figure 1. Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB)…
Figure 1. Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale scores after treatment with mononuclear cells 1 h (Panel A) and 9 days (Panel B) after rat spinal cord injury. Data are reported as means ± SD for 8-14 rats in each group. BBB scale, scores range from 0 (complete paralysis) to 21 (normal gait). *P ≤ 0.05 for the control and sham groups compared to the injured and treated groups. **P ≤ 0.05 for the injured group compared to the treated group (ANOVA followed by the Mann-Whitney test).
Figure 2. Volume of the thoracic spinal…
Figure 2. Volume of the thoracic spinal cord lesions of the group treated 1 h (Panel A) or 9 days (Panel B) after spinal cord injury. Data are reported as means ± SD for 5 rats in each group. *P ≤ 0.05, difference between the control groups and the spinal cord injured group (Mann-Whitney test). #P ≤ 0.05, difference between the control groups and treated group (Duncan test).
Figure 3. Identification of transplanted cells expressing…
Figure 3. Identification of transplanted cells expressing human-specific anti-nucleus and mitotic cell antigen (NUMA). Mononuclear cells from human umbilical cord (arrowheads) present at the lesion site, at the T9 level, administered into the injury site 1 h (A) and into the cistern magna 9 days (B) after the lesion.
Figure 4. Immunofluorescence staining for antinucleus and…
Figure 4. Immunofluorescence staining for antinucleus and mitotic cell antigen (NUMA) (A, D, G), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (B), synaptophysin (E), and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (NG2) (H) in sections of spinal cord at the T9 level of animals transplanted with mononuclear cells from umbilical cord blood 1 h after the lesion. Overlapping of the antibodies is represented as: C, NUMA (green) and GFAP (red); F, NUMA (green) and synaptophysin (red); I, NUMA (green) and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (NG2) (red). Arrowheads indicate: NUMA-positive cells (A, D, G); positive cells when labeled with GFAP (B), synaptophysin (E), and NG2 (H); doublelabeling with NUMA and GFAP (C), synaptophysin (F), and NG2 (I).
Figure 5. Immunofluorescence staining for nucleus and…
Figure 5. Immunofluorescence staining for nucleus and mitotic cell antigen (NUMA) (A, D, G), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) (B), synaptophysin (E) and chondroitin sulfate proteoglican (NG2) (H) in sections of spinal cord at the T9 level of animals transplanted with mononuclear cells from umbilical cord blood 9 days after the lesion. Overlapping of the antibodies is represented as: C, NUMA (green) and GFAP (red); F, NUMA (green) and synaptophysin (red); I, NUMA (green) and NG2 (red). Arrowheads indicate: NUMA-positive cells (A, D, G); positive cells when labeled with GFAP (B), synaptophysin (E), and NG2 (H); double-labeling with NUMA and GFAP (C), synaptophysin (F), and NG2 (I).

References

    1. Becker D, Sadowsky CL, McDonald JW. Restoring function after spinal cord injury. Neurologist. 2003;9:1–15.
    1. National Spinal Cord Injury Database (NSCID) . Accessed September 12, 2010.
    1. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) Census of 2000. Rio de Janeiro [Internet document] . Accessed September 12, 2010.
    1. Tator CH, Fehlings MG. Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:15–26.
    1. McDonald JW, Howard MJ. Repairing the damaged spinal cord: a summary of our early success with embryonic stem cell transplantation and remyelination. Prog Brain Res. 2002;137:299–309.
    1. Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. Graded histological and locomotor outcomes after spinal cord contusion using the NYU weight-drop device versus transection. Exp Neurol. 1996;139:244–256.
    1. Gruner JA. A monitored contusion model of spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9:123–126.
    1. Coutts M, Keirstead HS. Stem cells for the treatment of spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2008;209:368–377.
    1. Horner PJ, Gage FH. Regenerating the damaged central nervous system. Nature. 2000;407:963–970.
    1. Osaka M, Honmou O, Murakami T, Nonaka T, Houkin K, Hamada H. Intravenous administration of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow after contusive spinal cord injury improves functional outcome. Brain Res. 2010;1343:226–235.
    1. McDonald JW, Becker D, Holekamp TF, Howard M, Liu S, Lu A. Repair of the injured spinal cord and the potential of embryonic stem cell transplantation. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:383–393.
    1. Secco M, Zucconi E, Vieira NM, Fogaca LL, Cerqueira A, Carvalho MD. Multipotent stem cells from umbilical cord: cord is richer than blood! Stem Cells. 2008;26:146–150.
    1. Harris DT. Cord blood stem cells: a review of potential neurological applications. Stem Cell Rev. 2008;4:269–274.
    1. van de Ven C, Collins D, Bradley MB, Morris E, Cairo MS. The potential of umbilical cord blood multipotent stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissue and cell regeneration. Exp Hematol. 2007;35:1753–1765.
    1. Saporta S, Kim JJ, Willing AE, Fu ES, Davis CD, Sanberg PR. Human umbilical cord blood stem cells infusion in spinal cord injury: engraftment and beneficial influence on behavior. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2003;12:271–278.
    1. Kao CH, Chen SH, Chio CC, Lin MT. Human umbilical cord blood-derived CD34+ cells may attenuate spinal cord injury by stimulating vascular endothelial and neurotrophic factors. Shock. 2008;29:49–55.
    1. Dasari VR, Spomar DG, Li L, Gujrati M, Rao JS, Dinh DH. Umbilical cord blood stem cell mediated downregulation of fas improves functional recovery of rats after spinal cord injury. Neurochem Res. 2008;33:134–149.
    1. Weeks J, Hart RP. SCI-Base: an open-source spinal cord injury animal experimentation database. Lab Anim. 2004;33:35–41.
    1. Canabarro R, Sporleder H, Gomes T, Zanatta G, Scribel L, Freitas F. Immunophenotypic evaluation, and physiological and laboratory corelations of hematopoietic stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Biocell. 2007;31:397–403.
    1. Pranke P, Hendrikx J, Debnath G, Alespeiti G, Rubinstein P, Nardi N. Immunophenotype of hematopoietic stem cells from placental/umbilical cord blood after culture. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005;38:1775–1789.
    1. Andrews MR, Stelzner DJ. Evaluation of olfactory ensheathing and Schwann cells after implantation into a dorsal injury of adult rat spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24:1773–1792.
    1. Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12:1–21.
    1. Arteni NS, Pereira LO, Rodrigues AL, Lavinsky D, Achaval ME, Netto CA. Lateralized and sex-dependent behavioral and morphological effects of unilateral neonatal cerebral hypoxia-ischemia in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2010;210:92–98.
    1. Mestriner RG, Pagnussat AS, Boisserand LS, Valentim L, Netto CA. Skilled reaching training promotes astroglial changes and facilitated sensorimotor recovery after collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage. Exp Neurol. 2011;227:53–61.
    1. Chopp M, Zhang XH, Li Y, Wang L, Chen J, Lu D. Spinal cord injury in rat: treatment with bone marrow stromal cell transplantation. Neuroreport. 2000;11:3001–3005.
    1. Vaquero J, Zurita M, Oya S, Santos M. Cell therapy using bone marrow stromal cells in chronic paraplegic rats: systemic or local administration? Neurosci Lett. 2006;398:129–134.
    1. Lee KH, Suh-Kim H, Choi JS, Jeun SS, Kim EJ, Kim SS. Human mesenchymal stem cell transplantation promotes functional recovery following acute spinal cord injury in rats. Acta Neurobiol Exp. 2007;67:13–22.
    1. Nandoe Tewarie RD, Hurtado A, Ritfeld GJ, Rahiem ST, Wendell DF, Barroso MM. Bone marrow stromal cells elicit tissue sparing after acute but not delayed transplantation into the contused adult rat thoracic spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:2313–2322.
    1. Urdzikova L, Jendelova P, Glogarova K, Burian M, Hajek M, Sykova E. Transplantation of bone marrow stem cells as well as mobilization by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor promotes recovery after spinal cord injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:1379–1391.
    1. Park WB, Kim SY, Lee SH, Kim HW, Park JS, Hyun JK. The effect of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on the recovery of bladder and hindlimb function after spinal cord contusion in rats. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11:119.
    1. Rossi SL, Nistor G, Wyatt T, Yin HZ, Poole AJ, Weiss JH. Histological and functional benefit following transplantation of motor neuron progenitors to the injured rat spinal cord. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11852.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅