A cultural experience to support mental health in people aged 16-24 during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to a typical museum website: study protocol of an online randomised controlled trial

Rebecca J Syed Sheriff, Matti Vuorre, Evgenia Riga, Andrew K Przybylski, Helen Adams, Catherine J Harmer, John R Geddes, Rebecca J Syed Sheriff, Matti Vuorre, Evgenia Riga, Andrew K Przybylski, Helen Adams, Catherine J Harmer, John R Geddes

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence of common mental disorders in adolescents and young adults, and their association with poor health and socio-economic outcomes throughout the lifespan, many young people do not seek or receive help for such disorders. There is growing interest in the community sector in supporting mental health in young people; however, there is little by way of experimental research in this area. During the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown, we designed an online cultural experience to reduce anxiety and depression and support mental health in people aged 16-24.

Methods/design: The O-ACE POP (Online Active Community Engagement Proof of Principle) study is a UK-based online randomised controlled trial of an online cultural experience named Ways of Being, involving human centred narratives and viewpoints, compared with a typical museum website (the Ashmolean Museum). We aim to compare efficacy on affect, symptoms of epression and anxiety, flourishing and loneliness as well as investigating potential mechanisms of action.

Discussion: The COVID-19 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to design an innovative approach to supporting mental health in young adults. Findings derived from this study will allow us to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention and will inform the design of studies to further refine the resource and test it further.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04663594. Registered on 11 December 2020 (submitted in same form 27 November 2020). Protocol v1.0: 27 November 2020. Date recruitment began: 4 December 2020. Recruitment complete (estimate): February 2021.

Keywords: Anxiety; Culture; Depression; Experimental medicine; Randomised controlled trial; Web-based intervention; Youth.

Conflict of interest statement

AKP was supported by grants from the Huo Family Foundation and the Economic and Social Research Council (ES/T008709/1).

ER’s role is funded by the NIHR Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme (16/127/17).

RJSS, MV, HA, CH and JRG report no conflicts of interest.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments. FERT, Facial Expression Recognition Task; PILT, Probabilistic Instrumental Learning Task; K10, Kessler Distress Scale

References

    1. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):593–602. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593.
    1. Demyttenaere K, Bruffaerts R, Posada-Villa J, Gasquet I, Kovess V, Lepine JP, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S, de Girolamo G, Morosini P, Polidori G, Kikkawa T, Kawakami N, Ono Y, Takeshima T, Uda H, Karam EG, Fayyad JA, Karam AN, Mneimneh ZN, Medina-Mora ME, Borges G, Lara C, de Graaf R, Ormel J, Gureje O, Shen Y, Huang Y, Zhang M, Alonso J, Haro JM, Vilagut G, Bromet EJ, Gluzman S, Webb C, Kessler RC, Merikangas KR, Anthony JC, von Korff M, Wang PS, Brugha TS, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Lee S, Heeringa S, Pennell BE, Zaslavsky AM, Ustun TB, Chatterji S, WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA. 2004;291(21):2581–2590. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.21.2581.
    1. Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR, Klein DN, Gotlib IH. Natural course of adolescent major depressive disorder in a community sample: predictors of recurrence in young adults. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(10):1584–1591. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.10.
    1. Nock MK, Hwang I, Sampson N, Kessler RC, Angermeyer M, Beautrais A, Borges G, Bromet E, Bruffaerts R, de Girolamo G, de Graaf R, Florescu S, Gureje O, Haro JM, Hu C, Huang Y, Karam EG, Kawakami N, Kovess V, Levinson D, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Tomov T, Viana MC, Williams DR. Cross-national analysis of the associations among mental disorders and suicidal behavior: findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. PLoS Med. 2009;6(8):e1000123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.
    1. Wolpert M, Dalzell K, Ullman R, Garland L, Cortina M, Hayes D, Patalay P, Law D. Strategies not accompanied by a mental health professional to address anxiety and depression in children and young people: a scoping review of range and a systematic review of effectiveness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(1):46–60. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30465-6.
    1. Rickwood DJ, Deane FP, Wilson CJ. When and how do young people seek professional help for mental health problems? Med J Aust. 2007;187(S7):S35–S39. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01334.x.
    1. Gulliver A, Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young people: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2010;10(1):113. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-10-113.
    1. Auerbach RP, Mortier P, Bruffaerts R, Alonso J, Benjet C, Cuijpers P, Demyttenaere K, Ebert DD, Green JG, Hasking P, Murray E, Nock MK, Pinder-Amaker S, Sampson NA, Stein DJ, Vilagut G, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC, WHO WMH-ICS Collaborators WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018;127(7):623–638. doi: 10.1037/abn0000362.
    1. Kim H, Munson MR, McKay MM. Engagement in mental health treatment among adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Child Adolesc Soc Work J. 2012;29(3):241–266. doi: 10.1007/s10560-012-0256-2.
    1. Vizard TDJ, White E, Beynon B. Coronavirus and depression in adults, Great Britain. Off Natl Stat. 2020. .
    1. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–1070. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
    1. Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2004;43(Pt 3):245–265. doi: 10.1348/0144665031752934.
    1. Andrews G, Slade T. Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25(6):494–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00310.x.
    1. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–976. doi: 10.1017/S0033291702006074.
    1. Andrews G, Issakidis C, Carter G. Shortfall in mental health service utilisation. Br J Psychiatry. 2001;179(5):417–425. doi: 10.1192/bjp.179.5.417.
    1. Diener E, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indicators Res. 2009;97:143–156. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y.
    1. Romano I, Ferro MA, Patte KA, Diener E, Leatherdale ST. Measurement invariance of the flourishing scale among a large sample of Canadian adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):7800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217800.
    1. Pontinen HM, Swails JA. UCLA Loneliness Scale. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, editors. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 1–3.
    1. Hays RD, DiMatteo MR. A short-form measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1987;51(1):69–81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6.
    1. Measuring loneliness: guidance for use of the national indicators on surveys. Office of National Statistics. 2018.
    1. Harmer CJ, Cowen PJ, Goodwin GM. Efficacy markers in depression. J Psychopharmacol. 2011;25(9):1148–1158. doi: 10.1177/0269881110367722.
    1. Pessiglione M, Seymour B, Flandin G, Dolan RJ, Frith CD. Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature. 2006;442(7106):1042–1045. doi: 10.1038/nature05051.
    1. Walsh AEL, Browning M, Drevets WC, Furey M, Harmer CJ. Dissociable temporal effects of bupropion on behavioural measures of emotional and reward processing in depression. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1742).
    1. Walsh AEL, Huneke NTM, Brown R, Browning M, Cowen P, Harmer CJ. A Dissociation of the acute effects of bupropion on positive emotional processing and reward processing in healthy volunteers. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00482.
    1. Fofana F, Bazeley P, Regnault A. Applying a mixed methods design to test saturation for qualitative data in health outcomes research. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234898.
    1. NVivo qualitative data analysis software . QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 12 ed. 2018.
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, Moore L, O'Cathain A, Tinati T, Wight D, Baird J. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350(mar19 6):h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
    1. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2017.
    1. Prescott C. Internet access – households and individuals, Great Britain: 2020. Off Natl Stat. 2020.
    1. Blank GAD, William H, Lefkowitz J. Perceived threats to privacy online: the Internet in Britain, the Oxford Internet Surve. SSRN; 2019.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅