Ultrasound as a screening tool for performing caudal epidural injections

Mahshid Nikooseresht, Masoud Hashemi, Seyed Amir Mohajerani, Farideh Shahandeh, Mahvash Agah, Mahshid Nikooseresht, Masoud Hashemi, Seyed Amir Mohajerani, Farideh Shahandeh, Mahvash Agah

Abstract

Background: The caudal approach to the epidural space has been used for decades to treat low back pain caused by lumbosacral root compression. The use of fluoroscopy during epidural steroid injection is the preferred method for placing the needle more accurately in the sacral hiatus, but it carries the risk of radiation hazard.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the anatomical structure of the sacral hiatus and the feasibility of caudal epidural injections under ultrasound guidance.

Patients and methods: Two hundred and forty patients (male = 100, female = 140) with low back pain and sciatica who were candidates for caudal epidural injection were enrolled into this study. Ultrasound images of the sacral hiatus and bilateral cornua were obtained by a real-time linear array ultrasound transducer. The distance between bilateral cornua and the anterior and posterior wall of the sacrum were measured at the base (sacral hiatus). Under the guide of ultrasonography, we defined the injection successful if turbulence of medication fluid was observed in the sacral canal, but correct placement of the needle and injectant was confirmed on fluoroscopic view as the gold standard technique.

Results: The epidurogram showed that the injection was successful in 230 of the 240 patients (95.8%). In eight patients, the injection was not in the correct place in the sacral canal. The sacral hiatus could not be identified by ultrasound images in only two patients who had a closed sacral hiatus identified by fluoroscopy. The mean distance of the sacral hiatus was 4.7 ± 1.7 mm and the mean distance between bilateral cornua was 18.0 ± 2.8 mm. The mean duration of the procedure was 10.8 ± 6.8 minutes. No major complication was observed in the next month.

Conclusions: In conclusion, ultrasound could be used as a safe, fast and reliable modality to observe the anatomic variation of the sacral hiatus and to perform caudal epidural injections.

Keywords: Anesthesia, Caudal; Low Back Pain; Ultrasonography.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Transverse view of the sacral hiatus by ultrasound; the bilateral cornua are seen as reverse U-shaped structures.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Longitudinal view of the sacral hiatus by ultrasound, two points refer to the diameter of the sacral canal at the apex.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Needle in the sacral canal on the longitudinal view; arrowheads refer to the needle.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Fluoroscopic view of the contrast injected in the sacral canal
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Turbulence of the injected fluid in the sacral canal; T=Turbulence, the dashed line indicates the needle in the sacral hiatus.

References

    1. Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Koinig H, Kapral S, Weinstabl C, Mayer N. Ultrasonographic guidance improves sensory block and onset time of three-in-one blocks. Anesth Analg. 1997;85(4):854–7.
    1. Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Wallner T, Koinig H, Mayer N, Kapral S. Ultrasonographic guidance reduces the amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23(6):584–8.
    1. Abdi S, Datta S, Trescot AM, Schultz DM, Adlaka R, Atluri SL, et al. Epidural steroids in the management of chronic spinal pain: a systematic review. Pain Physician. 2007;10(1):185–212.
    1. Renfrew DL, Moore TE, Kathol MH, el-Khoury GY, Lemke JH, Walker CW. Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1991;12(5):1003–7.
    1. el-Khoury GY, Ehara S, Weinstein JN, Montgomery WJ, Kathol MH. Epidural steroid injection: a procedure ideally performed with fluoroscopic control. Radiology. 1988;168(2):554–7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.2969118.
    1. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, McManus CD, Damron KS. Evaluation of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2004;7(1):81–92.
    1. Lewis MP, Thomas P, Wilson LF, Mulholland RC. The 'whoosh' test. A clinical test to confirm correct needle placement in caudal epidural injections. Anaesthesia. 1992;47(1):57–8.
    1. Stitz MY, Sommer HM. Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(13):1371–6.
    1. Blanchais A, Le Goff B, Guillot P, Berthelot JM, Glemarec J, Maugars Y. Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural glucocorticoid injections. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77(5):440–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.04.016.
    1. Carette S, Leclaire R, Marcoux S, Morin F, Blaise GA, St-Pierre A, et al. Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(23):1634–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706053362303.
    1. Yoon JS, Sim KH, Kim SJ, Kim WS, Koh SB, Kim BJ. The feasibility of color Doppler ultrasonography for caudal epidural steroid injection. Pain. 2005;118(1-2):210–4. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.014.
    1. Chen CP, Wong AM, Hsu CC, Tsai WC, Chang CN, Lin SC, et al. Ultrasound as a screening tool for proceeding with caudal epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):358–63. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.019.
    1. Klocke R, Jenkinson T, Glew D. Sonographically guided caudal epidural steroid injections. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22(11):1229–32.
    1. Chen CP, Tang SF, Hsu TC, Tsai WC, Liu HP, Chen MJ, et al. Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(1):181–4.
    1. Raghunathan K, Schwartz D, Connelly NR. Determining the accuracy of caudal needle placement in children: a comparison of the swoosh test and ultrasonography. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18(7):606–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02529.x.
    1. Macchi V, Porzionato A, Morra A, Stecco C, De Caro R. Radiologic anatomy of the sacral canal. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;108:5–8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_2.
    1. Porzionato A, Macchi V, Parenti A, De Caro R. Surgical anatomy of the sacral hiatus for caudal access to the spinal canal. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;108:1–3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_1.
    1. Aggarwal A, Kaur H, Batra YK, Aggarwal AK, Rajeev S, Sahni D. Anatomic consideration of caudal epidural space: a cadaver study. Clin Anat. 2009;22(6):730–7. doi: 10.1002/ca.20832.
    1. Mustafa MS, Mahmoud OM, El Raouf HH, Atef HM. Morphometric study of sacral hiatus in adult human Egyptian sacra: Their significance in caudal epidural anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012;6(4):350–7. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.105862.
    1. Najman IE, Frederico TN, Segurado AV, Kimachi PP. Caudal epidural anesthesia: an anesthetic technique exclusive for pediatric use? Is it possible to use it in adults? What is the role of the ultrasound in this context? Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011;61(1):95–109. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70011-3.
    1. Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S. An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain. 2004;20(1):51–4.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅