Assessment of factors affecting the difficulty of caudal epidural injections in adults using ultrasound

Young Hoon Kim, Hue Jung Park, Sungkun Cho, Dong Eon Moon, Young Hoon Kim, Hue Jung Park, Sungkun Cho, Dong Eon Moon

Abstract

Background: In unaided caudal epidural block (CEB), incorrect needle insertion has been reported to occur in 15% to 38% of attempts.

Objective: To statistically analyze the anatomical variables affecting difficult CEB using ultrasonographic measurement.

Methods: Preprocedural ultrasonography was performed and the following measurements were obtained in 146 patients: the distance from the skin to the apex of the sacral hiatus; the depth of the sacral canal at the apex of the sacral hiatus; the length of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the apex of the sacral hiatus and sacral base; the distance from the skin to the apex of the sacral cornu; and the distance between the apexes of bilateral cornua. One clinician, unaware of the ultrasonographic findings, performed the injections using the landmark technique. The procedures were videotaped and were subsequently reviewed by an independent investigator.

Results: The means (± SDs) of the abovementioned measurements were 12.1±3.7 mm, 6.1±2.1 mm, 25.9±7.4 mm, 10.0±4.0 mm and 16.4±3.2&nbsp;mm, respectively. Injections failed in 16 (11%) patients and were defined as difficult in 21 (14.4%) patients. The depth of the sacral canal at the apex of sacral hiatus (P<0.001) and the length of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the apex of the sacral hiatus and sacral base (P=0.001) were significant predictors of difficult CEB. Of all patients, 85.7% and 75.2% were correctly classified as difficult or not difficult, respectively. The cutoff values of the depth of the sacral canal at the apex of the sacral hiatus and the length of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the apex of the sacral hiatus and the sacral base to predict a difficult CEB were 3.7 mm and 17.6 mm, respectively.

Conclusions: Both the depth of the sacral canal at the apex of the sacral hiatus and the length of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the apex of the sacral hiatus and sacral base are significant variables affecting the difficulty of the CEB.

Figures

Figure 1)
Figure 1)
Longitudinal view of the sacral hiatus. The top panel is an ultrasound image showing how the distance from the skin to the apex of sacral hiatus (i), the depth of the sacral canal at the apex of sacral hiatus (ii) and the length of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the apex of sacral hiatus and sacral base (iii) were measured. The bottom panel is a schematic diagram showing the apex of the sacral hiatus, sacrococcygeal ligament, sacral canal and sacral base
Figure 2)
Figure 2)
Transverse view of the sacral hiatus. The top panel is an ultrasound image showing how the distance from skin to the apex of sacral cornu (iv) and the distance between apices of bilateral cornua (v) were measured. The bottom panel is a schematic diagram showing the sacral cornua, sacrococcygeal ligament, caudal epidural space and sacral base
Figure 3)
Figure 3)
Ultrasonographic longitudinal image of difficult caudal epidural block. Ossification of the sacrococcygeal ligament is shown. The arrowheads indicate a needle. SL Short length of the sacrococcygeal ligament between the apex of the sacral hiatus and the sacral base

References

    1. Conn A, Buenaventura RM, Datta S, Abdi S, Diwan S. Systematic review of caudal epidural injections in the management of chronic low back pain. Pain Physician. 2009;12:109–35.
    1. Lewis MP, Thomas P, Wilson LF, Mulholland RC. The ‘whoosh’ test. A clinical test to confirm correct needle placement in caudal epidural injections. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:57–8.
    1. Chen CP, Wong AM, Hsu CC, et al. Ultrasound as a screening tool for proceeding with caudal epidural injections. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:358–63.
    1. Tsui BC, Tarkkila P, Gupta S, Kearney R. Confirmation of caudal needle placement using nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:374–8.
    1. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, McManus CD, Damron KS. Evaluation of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2004;7:81–92.
    1. Blanchais A, Le Goff B, Guillot P, et al. Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural glucocorticoid injections. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77:440–4.
    1. Chen CP, Tang SF, Hsu TC, et al. Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004;101:181–4.
    1. Shin KM, Park JH, Kil HK, et al. Caudal epidural block in children: Comparison of needle insertion parallel with caudal canal versus conventional two-step technique. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38:525–9.
    1. Park JH, Koo BN, Kim JY, et al. Determination of the optimal angle for needle insertion during caudal block in children using ultrasound imaging. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:946–9.
    1. Aggarwal A, Aggarwal A, Harjeet, Sahni D. Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31:793–800.
    1. Sekiguchi M, Yabuki S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S. An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: A basis for successful caudal epidural block. Clin J Pain. 2004;20:51–4.
    1. Klocke R, Jenkinson T, Glew D. Sonographically guided caudal epidural steroid injections. J Ultrasound Med. 2003;22:1229–32.
    1. Norenberg A, Johanson DC, Gravenstein JS. Racial differences in sacral structure important in caudal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1979;50:549–51.
    1. Aggarwal A, Kaur H, Batra YK, et al. Anatomic consideration of caudal epidural space: A cadaver study. Clin Anat. 2009;22:730–7.
    1. Woon JT, Stringer MD. Clinical anatomy of the coccyx: A systematic review. Clin Anat. 2012;25:158–67.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅