Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance phenotype as assessed by patient antimalarial drug levels and its association with pfmdr1 polymorphisms

Maja Malmberg, Pedro E Ferreira, Joel Tarning, Johan Ursing, Billy Ngasala, Anders Björkman, Andreas Mårtensson, José P Gil, Maja Malmberg, Pedro E Ferreira, Joel Tarning, Johan Ursing, Billy Ngasala, Anders Björkman, Andreas Mårtensson, José P Gil

Abstract

Background: Multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum is a major threat to global malaria control. Parasites develop resistance by gradually acquiring genetic polymorphisms that decrease drug susceptibility. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which parasites with different genetic characteristics are able to withstand individual drug blood concentrations.

Methods: We analyzed 2 clinical trials that assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine. As a proof of concept, we used measured day 7 lumefantrine concentrations to estimate the concentrations at which reinfections multiplied. P. falciparum multidrug resistance gene 1 (pfmdr1) genotypes of these parasites were then correlated to drug susceptibility.

Results: Reinfecting parasites with the pfmdr1 N86/184F/D1246 haplotype were able to withstand lumefantrine blood concentrations 15-fold higher than those with the 86Y/Y184/1246Y haplotype.

Conclusions: By estimating drug concentrations, we were able to quantify the contribution of pfmdr1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms to reduced lumefantrine susceptibility. The method can be applied to all long-half-life antimalarial drugs, enables early detection of P. falciparum with reduced drug susceptibility in vivo, and represents a novel way for unveiling molecular markers of antimalarial drug resistance.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Estimated lumefantrine (LUM) concentrations for reinfecting Plasmodium falciparum carrying different pfmdr1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at codons 86, 184, and 1246. Each reinfection is represented 3 times, once for each SNP. Only pure infections (concerning the pfmdr1 SNPs) were included in the analysis. According to the Mann–Whitney rank sum test, there was a significant difference between N86 and 86Y (P < .001), 184F and Y184 (P < .001), and D1246 and 1246Y (P = .006; Table 2). Black lines, median values; grey lines, interquartile ranges.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Estimated lumefantrine concentrations for reinfecting Plasmodium falciparum carrying different pfmdr1 haplotypes at codons 86, 184, and 1246. Each open circle represents a reinfection. Only haplotypes with ≥3 observations were considered for analysis. Median values were 31.4 nM (interquartile range [IQR], 10.5–76.1 nM) for NFD, 15.8 nM (IQR, 2.53–46.0 nM) for NYD, 2.16 nM (IQR, 0.293–3.77 nM) for YYY, and 0.678 nM (IQR, 0.108–3.87 nM) for YYD (Table 2). Black lines, median values; grey lines, interquartile ranges.

References

    1. Sisowath C, Stromberg J, Martensson A, et al. In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 86N coding alleles by artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem) J Infect Dis. 2005;191:1014–7.
    1. Sisowath C, Ferreira PE, Bustamante LY, et al. The role of pfmdr1 in Plasmodium falciparum tolerance to artemether-lumefantrine in Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:736–42.
    1. Sisowath C, Petersen I, Veiga MI, et al. In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum parasites carrying the chloroquine-susceptible pfcrt K76 allele after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine in Africa. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:750–7.
    1. Holmgren G, Hamrin J, Svard J, Martensson A, Gil JP, Bjorkman A. Selection of pfmdr1 mutations after amodiaquine monotherapy and amodiaquine plus artemisinin combination therapy in East Africa. Infection, Genetics and Evolution : Infect Genet Evol. 2007;7:562–9.
    1. Humphreys GS, Merinopoulos I, Ahmed J, et al. Amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine select distinct alleles of the Plasmodium falciparum mdr1 gene in Tanzanian children treated for uncomplicated malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:991–7.
    1. Martensson A, Ngasala B, Ursing J, et al. Influence of consecutive-day blood sampling on polymerase chain reaction-adjusted parasitological cure rates in an antimalarial-drug trial conducted in Tanzania. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:597–601.
    1. Juliano JJ, Ariey F, Sem R, et al. Misclassification of drug failure in Plasmodium falciparum clinical trials in southeast Asia. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:624–8.
    1. White NJ, Stepniewska K, Barnes K, Price RN, Simpson J. Simplified antimalarial therapeutic monitoring: using the day-7 drug level? Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:159–63.
    1. Ngasala BE, Malmberg M, Carlsson AM, et al. Efficacy and effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine after initial and repeated treatment in children <5 years of age with acute uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in rural Tanzania: a randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:873–82.
    1. Ngasala BE, Malmberg M, Carlsson AM, et al. Effectiveness of artemether-lumefantrine provided by community health workers in under-five children with uncomplicated malaria in rural Tanzania: an open label prospective study. Malar J. 2011;10:64.
    1. Blessborn D, Romsing S, Annerberg A, et al. Development and validation of an automated solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatographic method for determination of lumefantrine in capillary blood on sampling paper. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007;45:282–7.
    1. Hietala SF, Martensson A, Ngasala B, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of artemether and lumefantrine during combination treatment in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Tanzania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:4780–8.
    1. Tarning J, McGready R, Lindegardh N, et al. Population pharmacokinetics of lumefantrine in pregnant women treated with artemether-lumefantrine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:3837–46.
    1. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, van Vugt M, et al. Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1570–7.
    1. Gadalla NB, Adam I, Elzaki SE, et al. Increased pfmdr1 copy number and sequence polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Sudanese malaria patients treated with artemether-lumefantrine. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:5408–11.
    1. Mwai L, Kiara SM, Abdirahman A, et al. In vitro activities of piperaquine, lumefantrine, and dihydroartemisinin in Kenyan Plasmodium falciparum isolates and polymorphisms in pfcrt and pfmdr1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:5069–73.
    1. Mita T, Tanabe K, Kita K. Spread and evolution of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance. Parasitol Int. 2009;58:201–9.
    1. Hastings IM, Ward SA. Coartem (artemether-lumefantrine) in Africa: the beginning of the end? J Infect Dis. 2005;192:1303–4. author reply 4–5.
    1. Carlsson AM, Ngasala BE, Dahlstrom S, et al. Plasmodium falciparum population dynamics during the early phase of anti-malarial drug treatment in Tanzanian children with acute uncomplicated malaria. Malar J. 2011;10:380.
    1. Djimde AA, Tekete M, Abdulla S, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of a new pediatric formulation of artemether-lumefantrine in African children with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3994–9.
    1. Domanski D, Percy AJ, Yang J, et al. MRM-based multiplexed quantitation of 67 putative cardiovascular disease biomarkers in human plasma. Proteomics. 2012;12:1222–43.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅