An Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Older Adults With Complex Chronic Conditions: Cost-Utility Analysis

Rafael N Miranda, Aunima R Bhuiya, Zak Thraya, Rebecca Hancock-Howard, Brian Cf Chan, Carolyn Steele Gray, Walter P Wodchis, Kednapa Thavorn, Rafael N Miranda, Aunima R Bhuiya, Zak Thraya, Rebecca Hancock-Howard, Brian Cf Chan, Carolyn Steele Gray, Walter P Wodchis, Kednapa Thavorn

Abstract

Background: eHealth technologies for self-management can improve quality of life, but little is known about whether the benefits gained outweigh their costs. The electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) mobile app and portal system supports patients with multiple chronic conditions to collaborate with primary health care providers to set and monitor health-related goals.

Objective: This study aims to estimate the cost of ePRO and the cost utility of the ePRO intervention compared with usual care provided to patients with multiple chronic conditions and complex needs living in the community, from the perspective of the publicly funded health care payer in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We developed a decision tree model to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for the ePRO tool versus usual care over a time horizon of 15 months. Resource utilization and effectiveness of the ePRO tool were drawn from a randomized clinical trial with 6 family health teams involving 45 participants. Unit costs associated with health care utilization (adjusted to 2020 Canadian dollars) were drawn from literature and publicly available sources. A series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.

Results: The total cost of the ePRO tool was CAD $79,467 (~US $ 63,581; CAD $1733 [~US $1386] per person). Compared with standard care, the ePRO intervention was associated with higher costs (CAD $1710 [~US $1368]) and fewer QALYs (-0.03). The findings were consistent with the clinical evidence, suggesting no statistical difference in health-related quality of life between ePRO and usual care groups. However, the tool would be considered a cost-effective option if it could improve by at least 0.03 QALYs. The probability that the ePRO is cost-effective was 17.3% at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD $50,000 (~US $40,000)/QALY.

Conclusions: The ePRO tool is not a cost-effective technology at the commonly used WTP value of CAD $50,000 (~US $40,000)/QALY, but long-term and the societal impacts of ePRO were not included in this analysis. Further research is needed to better understand its impact on long-term outcomes and in real-world settings. The present findings add to the growing evidence about eHealth interventions' capacity to respond to complex aging populations within finite-resourced health systems.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02917954; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT02917954.

Keywords: Canada; North America; aging; chronic condition; chronic disease; community; complex care; cost; cost-effectiveness; decision tree; eHealth; elder; model; multimorbidity; older adult; patient reported outcome; primary care; sensitivity analysis.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Funding for this study is through a Canadian Federal Grant (CIHR; FN-143559), with the salaries of authors RHH, BCFC, CSG, WPW, and KT being funded through their academic and scientific positions at their respective institutions.

©Rafael N Miranda, Aunima R Bhuiya, Zak Thraya, Rebecca Hancock-Howard, Brian CF Chan, Carolyn Steele Gray, Walter P Wodchis, Kednapa Thavorn. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 20.04.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
One-way sensitivity analysis (tornado diagram). ePRO: electronic patient-reported outcome; EV: expected value; IT: information technology; NMB: net monetary benefit; QALY: quality-adjusted life year;.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Probabilistic sensitivity analysis. WTP: willingness-to-pay threshold.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. ePRO: electronic patient-reported outcome.

References

    1. Wodchis WP, Austin PC, Henry DA. A 3-year study of high-cost users of health care. CMAJ. 2016 Feb 16;188(3):182–188. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150064. cmaj.150064
    1. Navickas R, Petric V, Feigl AB, Seychell M. Multimorbidity: What do we know? What should we do? J Comorb. 2016 Feb 17;6(1):4–11. doi: 10.15256/joc.2016.6.72. joc.2016.6.72
    1. Thavorn K, Maxwell CJ, Gruneir A, Bronskill SE, Bai Y, Koné Pefoyo Anna J, Petrosyan Y, Wodchis WP. Effect of socio-demographic factors on the association between multimorbidity and healthcare costs: a population-based, retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 06;7(10):e017264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017264. bmjopen-2017-017264
    1. Ioakeim-Skoufa I, Poblador-Plou B, Carmona-Pírez Jonás, Díez-Manglano Jesús, Navickas R, Gimeno-Feliu LA, González-Rubio Francisca, Jureviciene E, Dambrauskas L, Prados-Torres A, Gimeno-Miguel A. Multimorbidity Patterns in the General Population: Results from the EpiChron Cohort Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 14;17(12):4242. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124242. ijerph17124242
    1. Griffith LE, Gruneir A, Fisher K, Panjwani D, Gafni A, Patterson C, Markle-Reid M, Ploeg J. Insights on multimorbidity and associated health service use and costs from three population-based studies of older adults in Ontario with diabetes, dementia and stroke. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 16;19(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4149-3. 10.1186/s12913-019-4149-3
    1. Schaink AK, Kuluski K, Lyons RF, Fortin M, Jadad AR, Upshur R, Wodchis WP. A scoping review and thematic classification of patient complexity: offering a unifying framework. J Comorb. 2012 Oct 10;2(1):1–9. doi: 10.15256/joc.2012.2.15.
    1. Bayliss E, Bosworth H, Noel P, Wolff J, Damush T, Mciver L. Supporting self-management for patients with complex medical needs: recommendations of a working group. Chronic Illn. 2007 Jun 29;3(2):167–75. doi: 10.1177/1742395307081501.3/2/167
    1. Burgers JS, Voerman GE, Grol R, Faber MJ, Schneider EC. Quality and coordination of care for patients with multiple conditions: results from an international survey of patient experience. Eval Health Prof. 2010 Sep 27;33(3):343–64. doi: 10.1177/0163278710375695.0163278710375695
    1. Steele Gray C, Wodchis WP, Upshur R, Cott C, McKinstry B, Mercer S, Palen TE, Ramsay T, Thavorn K, Project Collaborators And Technology Partner‚ QoC Health Inc Supporting Goal-Oriented Primary Health Care for Seniors with Complex Care Needs Using Mobile Technology: Evaluation and Implementation of the Health System Performance Research Network, Bridgepoint Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jun 24;5(2):e126. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5756. v5i2e126
    1. Steele Gray C, Chau E, Tahsin F, Harvey S, Loganathan M, McKinstry B, Mercer SW, Nie JX, Palen TE, Ramsay T, Thavorn K, Upshur R, Wodchis WP. Assessing the Implementation and Effectiveness of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Older Adults With Complex Care Needs: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 02;23(12):e29071. doi: 10.2196/29071. v23i12e29071
    1. Iribarren SJ, Cato K, Falzon L, Stone PW. What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170581. PONE-D-16-26479
    1. Ontario Ministry of Health Family Health Teams. Ontario Ministry of Health. [2021-07-23].
    1. Steele Gray C, Gravesande J, Hans PK, Nie JX, Sharpe S, Loganathan M, Lyons R, Cott C. Using Exploratory Trials to Identify Relevant Contexts and Mechanisms in Complex Electronic Health Interventions: Evaluating the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool. JMIR Form Res. 2019 Feb 27;3(1):e11950. doi: 10.2196/11950. v3i1e11950
    1. Steele Gray C, Khan AI, Kuluski K, McKillop I, Sharpe S, Bierman AS, Lyons RF, Cott C. Improving Patient Experience and Primary Care Quality for Patients With Complex Chronic Disease Using the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool: Adopting Qualitative Methods Into a User-Centered Design Approach. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Feb 18;5(1):e28. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5204. v5i1e28
    1. Steele Gray C, Gill A, Khan AI, Hans PK, Kuluski K, Cott C. The Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool: Testing Usability and Feasibility of a Mobile App and Portal to Support Care for Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability in Primary Care Settings. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 02;4(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5331. v4i2e58
    1. Steele Gray C, Miller D, Kuluski K, Cott C. Tying eHealth Tools to Patient Needs: Exploring the Use of eHealth for Community-Dwelling Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014 Nov 26;3(4):e67. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3500. v3i4e67
    1. Steele Gray C, Irfan Khan A, McKillop I, Sharpe S, Cott C. User-centred co-design with multiple user groups: The case of the electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) mobile application and portal. Int J Integr Care. 2019 Aug 08;19(4):439. doi: 10.5334/ijic.s3439.
    1. Steele Gray C, Gill A, Khan AI, Hans PK, Kuluski K, Cott C. The Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Tool: Testing Usability and Feasibility of a Mobile App and Portal to Support Care for Patients With Complex Chronic Disease and Disability in Primary Care Settings. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 02;4(2):e58. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5331. v4i2e58
    1. Hans PK, Gray CS, Gill A, Tiessen J. The provider perspective: investigating the effect of the Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) mobile application and portal on primary care provider workflow. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2017 Sep 13;19(02):151–164. doi: 10.1017/s1463423617000573.
    1. Osborne R. Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly Validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2003 Feb;56(2):138–147. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00601-7.
    1. Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher MJ. Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2005 May;14(5):487–96. doi: 10.1002/hec.944.
    1. Thavorn K, Wodchis W, Maxwell C, Koné A, Gruneir A, Bronskill S. Economic Burden of Multimorbidity in Ontario's Health Care System. Canadian Association for Health Services and Policy Research (CAHSPR) 2013
    1. Legislative Assembly of Ontario . Physician Billing. Toronto, ON, Canada: Queen’s Printer for Ontario; 2016. 2016 Annual Report of the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario.
    1. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Salary Benchmarks for Interdisciplinary Health Care Providers. Family Health Teams: Guide to Interdisciplinary Provider Compensation. 2010. [2021-07-23]. .
    1. Lindsay A, Hibbard JH, Boothroyd DB, Glaseroff A, Asch SM. Patient Activation Changes as a Potential Signal for Changes in Health Care Costs: Cohort Study of US High-Cost Patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Dec 5;33(12):2106–2112. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4657-6. 10.1007/s11606-018-4657-6
    1. Glazier RH, Redelmeier Donald A. Building the patient-centered medical home in Ontario. JAMA. 2010 Jun 02;303(21):2186–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.753.303/21/2186
    1. Hibbard J, Stockard J, Mahoney E, Tusler M. Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):1005–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x. HESR269
    1. Barker I, Steventon A, Williamson R, Deeny SR. Self-management capability in patients with long-term conditions is associated with reduced healthcare utilisation across a whole health economy: cross-sectional analysis of electronic health records. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Dec 23;27(12):989–999. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007635. bmjqs-2017-007635
    1. Greene J, Hibbard JH, Sacks R, Overton V, Parrotta CD. When patient activation levels change, health outcomes and costs change, too. Health Aff (Millwood) 2015 Mar;34(3):431–7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0452.34/3/431
    1. Ryan D, Price D, Musgrave SD, Malhotra S, Lee AJ, Ayansina D, Sheikh A, Tarassenko L, Pagliari C, Pinnock H. Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012 Mar 23;344(mar23 1):e1756–e1756. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1756.
    1. Luxton DD, Hansen RN, Stanfill K. Mobile app self-care versus in-office care for stress reduction: a cost minimization analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Oct 14;20(8):431–435. doi: 10.1177/1357633x14555616.
    1. Maddison R, Pfaeffli L, Whittaker R, Stewart R, Kerr A, Jiang Y, Kira G, Leung W, Dalleck L, Carter K, Rawstorn J. A mobile phone intervention increases physical activity in people with cardiovascular disease: Results from the HEART randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jun 09;22(6):701–9. doi: 10.1177/2047487314535076.2047487314535076
    1. Hagberg LA, Brekke HK, Bertz F, Winkvist A. Cost-utility analysis of a randomized controlled weight loss trial among lactating overweight/obese women. BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 15;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-38. 1471-2458-14-38
    1. Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Drummond M, McCabe C. Whither trial-based economic evaluation for health care decision making? Health Econ. 2006 Jul;15(7):677–87. doi: 10.1002/hec.1093.
    1. Nundy S, Dick JJ, Chou C, Nocon RS, Chin MH, Peek ME. Mobile phone diabetes project led to improved glycemic control and net savings for Chicago plan participants. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014 Feb;33(2):265–72. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0589. 33/2/265
    1. Kuluski K, Gill A, Naganathan G, Upshur R, Jaakkimainen RL, Wodchis WP. A qualitative descriptive study on the alignment of care goals between older persons with multi-morbidities, their family physicians and informal caregivers. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 08;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-133. 1471-2296-14-133
    1. Reuben DB, Tinetti ME. Goal-Oriented Patient Care — An Alternative Health Outcomes Paradigm. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar;366(9):777–779. doi: 10.1056/nejmp1113631.
    1. Maddigan SL, Majumdar SR, Johnson JA. Understanding the complex associations between patient-provider relationships, self-care behaviours, and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: a structural equation modeling approach. Qual Life Res. 2005 Aug;14(6):1489–500. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-0586-z.
    1. Armstrong KA, Semple JL, Coyte PC. Replacing ambulatory surgical follow-up visits with mobile app home monitoring: modeling cost-effective scenarios. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 22;16(9):e213. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3528. v16i9e213
    1. Wittenborn JS, Clemons T, Regillo C, Rayess N, Liffmann Kruger D, Rein D. Economic Evaluation of a Home-Based Age-Related Macular Degeneration Monitoring System. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 May 01;135(5):452–459. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0255. 2613353

Source: PubMed

3
订阅