Compensation models for community health workers: Comparison of legal frameworks across five countries

Madeleine Ballard, Carey Westgate, Rebecca Alban, Nandini Choudhury, Rehan Adamjee, Ryan Schwarz, Julia Bishop, Meg McLaughlin, David Flood, Karen Finnegan, Ash Rogers, Helen Olsen, Ari Johnson, Daniel Palazuelos, Jennifer Schechter, Madeleine Ballard, Carey Westgate, Rebecca Alban, Nandini Choudhury, Rehan Adamjee, Ryan Schwarz, Julia Bishop, Meg McLaughlin, David Flood, Karen Finnegan, Ash Rogers, Helen Olsen, Ari Johnson, Daniel Palazuelos, Jennifer Schechter

Abstract

Background: Despite the life-saving work they perform, community health workers (CHWs) have long been subject to global debate about their remuneration. There is now, however, an emerging consensus that CHWs should be paid. As the discussion evolves from whether to financially remunerate CHWs to how to do so, there is an urgent need to better understand the types of CHW payment models and their implications.

Methods: This study examines the legal framework on CHW compensation in five countries: Brazil, Ghana, Nigeria, Rwanda, and South Africa. In order to map the characteristics of each approach, a review of the regulatory framework governing CHW compensation in each country was undertaken. Law firms in each of the five countries were engaged to support the identification and interpretation of relevant legal documents. To guide the search and aid in the creation of uniform country profiles, a standardized set of questions was developed, covering: (i) legal requirements for CHW compensation, (ii) CHW compensation mechanisms, and (iii) CHW legal protections and benefits.

Results: The five countries profiled represent possible archetypes for CHW compensation: Brazil (public), Ghana (volunteer-based), Nigeria (private), Rwanda (cooperatives with performance based incentives) and South Africa (hybrid public/private). Advantages and disadvantages of each model with respect to (i) CHWs, in terms of financial protection, and (ii) the health system, in terms of ease of implementation, are outlined.

Conclusions: While a strong legal framework does not necessarily translate into high-quality implementation of compensation practices, it is the first necessary step. Certain approaches to CHW compensation - particularly public-sector or models with public sector wage floors - best institutionalize recommended CHW protections. Political will and long-term financing often remain challenges; removing ecosystem barriers - such as multilateral and bilateral restrictions on the payment of salaries - can help governments institutionalize CHW payment.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest.

Copyright © 2021 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Ballard M, Madore A, Johnson A, Keita Y, Haag E, Palazuelos D, et al. Concept note: Community health workers. Cambridge: Harvard Business Publishing; 2018.
    1. McPake B, Edoka I, Witter S, Kielmann K, Taegtmeyer M, Dieleman M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of community-based practitioner programmes in Ethiopia, Indonesia and Kenya. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:631-639A. 10.2471/BLT.14.144899
    1. Lewin S, Munabi-Babigumira S, Glenton C, Daniels K, Bosch-Capblanch X, Van Wyk BE, et al. Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3:CD004015. 10.1002/14651858.CD004015.pub3
    1. Dahn B, Woldemariam A, Perry H, Maeda A, von Glahn D, Panjabi R, et al. Strengthening primary health care through community health workers: investment case and financing recommendations. Geneva: Office of UN Secretary General’s Special Envoy for Financing the Health Millennium Development Goals and for Malaria. 2015.
    1. Bhattacharyya K, Winch P, LeBan K, Tien M. Community health worker incentives and disincentives: how they affect motivation, retention, and sustainability. Arlington: BASICS II; 2001.
    1. Kironde S, Bajunirwe F.Lay workers in directly observed treatment (DOT) programmes for tuberculosis in high burden settings: should they be paid? A review of behavioural perspectives. Afr Health Sci. 2002;2:73-8.
    1. Maes K.“Volunteers are not paid because they are priceless”: community health worker capacities and values in an AIDS treatment intervention in urban Ethiopia. Med Anthropol Q. 2015;29:97-115. 10.1111/maq.12136
    1. For example:Swechhya B, Kamaraj R.Female community health volunteers program in Nepal: perceptions, attitudes and experiences on volunteerism among female community health volunteers. Int J Interdiscip Multidiscip Stud. 2014;1:9-15.
    1. Ballard M, Bonds M, Burey J, Dini HSF, Foth J, Furth R, et al. Community Health Worker Assessment and Improvement Matrix (CHW AIM): Updated Program Functionality Matrix for Optimizing Community Health Programs. 2018. Available: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27361.76644. Accessed: 10 December 2020.10.13140/RG.2.2.27361.76644
    1. International Labour Organization. Decent Work. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. The United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO guideline on health policy and system support to optimize community health worker programmes. World Health Organization; 2018.
    1. Addati L, Cattaneo U, Esquivel V, Valarino I. Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. Op. cit. 2018.
    1. Maes K, Closser S, Tesfaye Y, Abesha R.Psychosocial distress among unpaid community health workers in rural Ethiopia: Comparing leaders in Ethiopia’s Women’s Development Army to their peers. Soc Sci Med. 2019;230:138-46. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.005
    1. Perry H. Health for the People: National Community Health Worker Programs from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. Washington D.C.: USAID; 2020.
    1. Community Health Impact Coalition Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Financing Alliance for Health Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Delbecq AL, de Ven V.A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci. 1971;7:466-92. 10.1177/002188637100700404
    1. TrustLaw Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Ballard M, Montgomery P.Systematic review of interventions for improving the performance of community health workers in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014216. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014216
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A.Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10:45-53. 10.1177/135581960501000110
    1. Article 6 of Law No. 11,350/2006. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Chamber of Deputies. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. 1988.
    1. Diário da Câmara dos Deputados. Lei Nº 11.350. 2006 October 5. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Ministério da Saúde. PORTARIA Nº 2.488. 2011 October 21. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Article 16 of Law No. 11,350/2006. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Article 9-A, paragraph 3, of Law No. 11,350/2006. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Diário da Câmara dos Deputados. Lei Nº 9.608. 1998 February 18. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Chamber of Deputies. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. 1988.
    1. Act L. 2003 (Act 651). Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Government of Ghana. National Community based Health Planning and Services Policy (CHPS). March 2016. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Trade Unions Act, Chapter T14, LFN. 2004 (as amended by the Trade Union (Amendment) Act 2005). Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. The Nigerian Labour Act cap L1 LFN 2004. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Community Health Practitioners. (Registration, etc.) Act, Chapter C19, LFN. 2004. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. The Nigerian Labour Act cap L1 LFN 2004. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Central CHW. Rwanda Community Health Worker Program. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Rwanda Ministry of Health. National Community Health Policy. Kigali. June 2015. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Rwanda Ministry of Health. National Community Health Strategic Plan. Kigali. 2013. Available: . Accessed: 10 June 2019.
    1. Rwanda Ministry of Health. Health Sector Policy. Kigali. January 2015. Available: .
    1. Shapira G, Kalisa I, Condo J, Humuza J, Mugeni C, Nkunda D, et al. Effects of performance incentives for community health worker cooperatives in Rwanda. The World Bank; 2017.
    1. For example, in July of 2020, CHWs in South Africa’s most populous province, Gauteng, were recognized as employees by the Department of Health: More Than 8k Community Healthcare Workers To Be Converted To Employees In July. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. South Africa Department of Health. Policy Framework and Strategy for Ward-Based Primary Healthcare Outreach Teams. Pretoria. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. Public Health and Social Development Sectoral Bargaining Council. Agreement on the Standardisation of Remuneration for Community Health Workers in the Department of Health. 12 June 2018. Available: . Accessed: 10 December 2020.
    1. The LRA, BCEA, Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 and the Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993.
    1. Cometto G, Ford N, Pfaffman-Zambruni J, Akl EA, Lehmann U, McPake B, et al. Health policy and system support to optimise community health worker programmes: an abridged WHO guideline. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6:e1397-404. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30482-0
    1. Unless otherwise indicated, information on CHW job demands and hours adapted from: Perry H. Health for the People: National Community Health Worker Programs from Afghanistan to Zimbabwe. Washington D.C.: USAID; 2020.
    1. Ntsua S, Tapsoba P, Asare GQ, Nyonator FK. Repositioning community-based family planning in Ghana: A case study of Community-based Health Planning and Services (CHPS). Washington D.C.: Population Council, 2012.
    1. Okoroafor S, Ngobua S, Titus M, Opubo I.Applying the workload indicators of staffing needs method in determining frontline health workforce staffing for primary level facilities in Rivers state Nigeria. Glob Health Res Policy. 2019;4:35. 10.1186/s41256-019-0125-z
    1. D’Aquino L, Mahieu A. Rwanda: Comprehensive Evaluation of The Community Health Program in Rwanda. London, United Kingdom: London School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene; 2016.
    1. Farmer P. Pathologies of power: Health, Human Rights and the New War on the Poor. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2003.
    1. Ballard M, Schwarz R.Employing practitioner expertise in optimizing community healthcare systems. Healthc (Amst). 2019;7:100334. 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2018.08.003
    1. Lu C, Palazuelos D, Luan Y, Sachs SE, Mitnick CD, Rhatigan J, et al. Development assistance for community health workers in 114 low-and middle-income countries, 2007–2017. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98:30. 10.2471/BLT.19.235499
    1. Farmer P. Partner to the Poor: a Paul Farmer Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2010.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅