Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser

Olivier Traxer, Etienne Xavier Keller, Olivier Traxer, Etienne Xavier Keller

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the operating modes of the Holmium:YAG laser and Thulium fiber laser. Additionally, currently available literature on Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy is reviewed.

Materials and methods: Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles relating to the operating modes of Holmium:YAG and Thulium fiber lasers, including systematic review of articles on Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy.

Results: The laser beam emerging from the Holmium:YAG laser involves fundamental architectural design constraints compared to the Thulium fiber laser. These differences translate into multiple potential advantages in favor of the Thulium fiber laser: four-fold higher absorption coefficient in water, smaller operating laser fibers (50-150 µm core diameter), lower energy per pulse (as low as 0.025 J), and higher maximal pulse repetition rate (up to 2000 Hz). Multiple comparative in vitro studies suggest a 1.5-4 times faster stone ablation rate in favor of the Thulium fiber laser.

Conclusions: The Thulium fiber laser overcomes the main limitations reported with the Holmium:YAG laser relating to lithotripsy, based on preliminary in vitro studies. This innovative laser technology seems particularly advantageous for ureteroscopy and may become an important milestone for kidney stone treatment.

Keywords: Holmium:YAG laser; Innovation; Lithotripsy; Thulium fiber laser; Urinary stone.

Conflict of interest statement

Prof. Olivier Traxer is a consultant for Coloplast, Rocamed, Olympus, EMS, Boston Scientific and IPG Medical.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Absorption coefficient of liquid water at room temperature (22 °C) in the near-infrared range (red line). The Thulium fiber laser has been adapted to operate at 1940 nm, a wavelength close to a water absorption peak (approximatively 14 mm−1). Comparatively, the wavelength of the Holmium:YAG laser (2120 nm) has a much lower absorption coefficient in liquid water (approximatively 3 mm−1)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of the operating mode of a Holmium:YAG laser cavity. a Broad-spectrum white light is emitted from a flashlamp (typically Xenon or Krypton). b The white light interacts with the Holmium ions that are chemically bound to the YAG crystal and excites Holmium-electrons into higher-energy quantum states. b This interaction results in the emission of new photons with a characteristic wavelength of 2120 nm. Additional white light emitted from the flashlamp adds to Holmium ions excitation, a process referred to as “laser pumping”. c The radiation is reflected between the mirrors of the laser cavity. d, e: Because prior laser pumping excited numerous Holmium ions to higher-energy states, the reflected radiation will interact with the excited Holmium ions and stimulate emission of multiple additional photons at 2120 nm. This phenomenon is referred to as “light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (LASER)”. f A transient opening of the cavity releases the radiation in the form of a pulsed laser beam
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Schematic representation of Holmium:YAG laser generators. Low-power generators are made out of a single laser cavity (gray box) that emits its laser beam (pink) in line with the output connector and the proximal end of the laser fiber (blue). High-power generators incorporate multiple laser cavities (gray boxes) and require a complex alignment of laser beams (pink) to the output connector for safe transmission to the delivery fiber (blue). A vapor-compression refrigeration system (yellow box) is necessary for cooling of high-power Holmium:YAG generators
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Schematic representation of a Thulium fiber laser. Laser pumping is achieved by electronically modulating diode lasers (pink boxes). A Thulium-doped, 10–20 µm core diameter, 10–30 m long silica fiber (red tube with green spots) is used as a gain medium for the generation of a laser beam. The uniform laser beam at the output connector allows for the use of laser fibers as small as 50 µm (blue)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Relationship between fiber core diameter, cross-sectional area and energy density. a When the core diameter is divided by two, the cross-sectional area is divided by four. b When the core diameter is divided by two, the energy density is increased by four

References

    1. Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE. Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg Med. 1992;12(4):353–363.
    1. Sayer J, Johnson DE, Price RE, Cromeens DM. Ureteral lithotripsy with the Holmium:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1993;11(2):61–65.
    1. Teichman JM, Vassar GJ, Bishoff JT, Bellman GC. Holmium:YAG Lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol. 1998;159(1):17–23.
    1. Keller EX, De Coninck V, Audouin M, Doizi S, Bazin D, Daudon M, Traxer O. Fragments and Dust after Holmium Laser Lithotripsy with or without “Moses Technology”: How are they different? J Biophotonics. 2018
    1. Kronenberg P, Traxer O. The truth about laser fiber diameters. Urology. 2014;84(6):1301–1307.
    1. Kronenberg P, Traxer O. Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers. World J Urol. 2015;33(4):463–469.
    1. Emiliani E, Talso M, Haddad M, Pouliquen C, Derman J, Cote JF, Doizi S, Millan F, Berthe L, Audouin M, Traxer O. The true ablation effect of Holmium YAG laser on soft tissue. J Endourol. 2018;32(3):230–235.
    1. Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1996;47(1):48–51.
    1. Bach T, Muschter R, Sroka R, Gravas S, Skolarikos A, Herrmann TR, Bayer T, Knoll T, Abbou CC, Janetschek G, Bachmann A, Rassweiler JJ. Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):317–325.
    1. Sea J, Jonat LM, Chew BH, Qiu J, Wang B, Hoopman J, Milner T, Teichman JM. Optimal power settings for Holmium:YAG Lithotripsy. J Urol. 2012;187(3):914–919.
    1. Kronenberg P, Traxer O. In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy—a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters. BJU Int. 2014;114(2):261–267.
    1. Dauw CA, Simeon L, Alruwaily AF, Sanguedolce F, Hollingsworth JM, Roberts WW, Faerber GJ, Wolf JS, Jr, Ghani KR. Contemporary practice patterns of flexible ureteroscopy for treating renal stones: results of a worldwide survey. J Endourol. 2015;29(11):1221–1230.
    1. Doizi S, Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O. Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean? Nat Rev Urol. 2018
    1. Weiss B, Shah O. Evaluation of dusting versus basketing—can new technologies improve stone-free rates? Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(12):726–733.
    1. Aldoukhi AH, Roberts WW, Hall TL, Ghani KR. Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the new stone age: dust or bust? Front Surg. 2017;4:57.
    1. Tracey J, Gagin G, Morhardt D, Hollingsworth J, Ghani KR. Ureteroscopic high-frequency dusting utilizing a 120-W Holmium laser. J Endourol. 2018;32(4):290–295.
    1. Turk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Knoll T (2018) EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Last update March 2018. . Accessed 25 Sep 2018
    1. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–482.
    1. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM, Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, Part II. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1161–1169.
    1. Fried NM, Irby PB. Advances in laser technology and fibre-optic delivery systems in lithotripsy. Nat Rev Urol. 2018
    1. Soret J-L. Sur les spectres d’absorption ultra-violets des terres de la gadolinite. C R Acad Sci. 1878;87:1062.
    1. Soret J-L. Sur le spectre des terres faisant partie du groupe de l’yttria. C R Acad Sci. 1879;89:521.
    1. Cleve PT. Sur deux nouveaux éléments dans l’erbine. C R Acad Sci. 1879;89(9):478–480.
    1. Jansen ED, van Leeuwen TG, Motamedi M, Borst C, Welch AJ. Temperature dependence of the absorption coefficient of water for midinfrared laser radiation. Lasers Surg Med. 1994;14(3):258–268.
    1. Talso M, Emiliani E, Haddad M, Berthe L, Baghdadi M, Montanari E, Traxer O. Laser fiber and flexible ureterorenoscopy: the safety distance concept. J Endourol. 2016;30(12):1269–1274.
    1. Hale GM, Querry MR. Optical constants of water in the 200-nm to 200-µm wavelength region. Appl Opt. 1973;12(3):555–563.
    1. Chan KF, Vassar GJ, Pfefer TJ, Teichman JM, Glickman RD, Weintraub ST, Welch AJ. Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: a dominant photothermal ablative mechanism with chemical decomposition of urinary calculi. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;25(1):22–37.
    1. Vassar GJ, Chan KF, Teichman JM, Glickman RD, Weintraub ST, Pfefer TJ, Welch AJ. Holmium:YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism. J Endourol. 1999;13(3):181–190.
    1. Albagli D, Perelman LT, Janes GS, Von Rosenberg C, Itzkan I, Feld MS. Inertially confined ablation of biological tissue. Lasers Life Sci. 1994;6(1):55–68.
    1. Fried D, Zuerlein M, Featherstone JDB, Seka W, Duhn C, McCormack SM. IR laser ablation of dental enamel: mechanistic dependence on the primary absorber. Appl Surf Sci. 1998;127–129:852–856.
    1. Altshuler GB, Belikov AV, Sinelnik YA. A laser-abrasive method for the cutting of enamel and dentin. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(5):435–444.
    1. Khan SR, Hackett RL. Role of organic matrix in urinary stone formation: an ultrastructural study of crystal matrix interface of calcium oxalate monohydrate stones. J Urol. 1993;150(1):239–245.
    1. Vordos N, Giannakopoulos S, Vansant EF, Kalaitzis C, Nolan JW, Bandekas DV, Karavasilis I, Mitropoulos AC, Touloupidis S. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and nitrogen porosimetry (NP): two novel techniques for the evaluation of urinary stone hardness. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(10):1779–1785.
    1. Nandakumar V, Krishnasamy K, Dhavamani J, Shroff S, Doble M. Comparative characterization of renal calculi from patients with clinical disorders. Clin Biochem. 2012;45(13–14):1097–1098.
    1. Chan KF, Pfefer TJ, Teichman JM, Welch AJ. A perspective on laser lithotripsy: the fragmentation processes. J Endourol. 2001;15(3):257–273.
    1. Fried NM. Recent advances in infrared laser lithotripsy. Biomed Optics Express. 2018
    1. Hardy LA, Irby PB, Fried NM. Scanning electron microscopy of real and artificial kidney stones before and after Thulium fiber laser ablation in air and water. Proc SPIE. 2018
    1. Haddad M, Emiliani E, Rouchausse Y, Coste F, Doizi S, Berthe L, Buttice S, Somani B, Traxer O. Impact of the curve diameter and laser settings on laser fiber fracture. J Endourol. 2017;31(9):918–921.
    1. Nazif OA, Teichman JM, Glickman RD, Welch AJ. Review of laser fibers: a practical guide for urologists. J Endourol. 2004;18(9):818–829.
    1. Scott NJ, Cilip CM, Fried NM. Thulium fiber laser ablation of urinary stones through small-core optical fibers. IEEE J Sel Top Quant. 2009;15(2):435–440.
    1. Jackson SD, Lauto A. Diode-pumped fiber lasers: a new clinical tool? Lasers Surg Med. 2002;30(3):184–190.
    1. Blackmon RL, Hutchens TC, Hardy LA, Wilson CR, Irby PB, Fried NM. Thulium fiber laser ablation of kidney stones using a 50-μm-core silica optical fiber. Opt Eng. 2014
    1. Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Malcolm AR, Fraundorfer MR. Combination holmium and Nd:YAG laser ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience. J Endourol. 1995;9(2):151–153.
    1. Humphreys MR, Shah OD, Monga M, Chang YH, Krambeck AE, Sur RL, Miller NL, Knudsen BE, Eisner BH, Matlaga BR, Chew BH. Dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy—which technique is more efficacious? A prospective multicenter trial from the EDGE research consortium. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1272–1276.
    1. Matlaga BR, Chew B, Eisner B, Humphreys M, Knudsen B, Krambeck A, Lange D, Lipkin M, Miller NL, Monga M, Pais V, Sur RL, Shah O. Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: a review of dusting vs fragmentation with extraction. J Endourol. 2018;32(1):1–6.
    1. Pasqui F, Dubosq F, Tchala K, Tligui M, Gattegno B, Thibault P, Traxer O. Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. Eur Urol. 2004;45(1):58–64.
    1. Kronenberg P, Traxer O. V1718 laser fibers, pulse energy and retropulsion-what we can see and what we can’t. J Urol. 2013;189(4):e707.
    1. Lee H, Ryan RT, Kim J, Choi B, Arakeri NV, Teichman JM, Welch AJ. Dependence of calculus retropulsion dynamics on fiber size and radiant exposure during Ho:YAG lithotripsy. J Biomech Eng. 2004;126(4):506–515.
    1. Spore SS, Teichman JM, Corbin NS, Champion PC, Williamson EA, Glickman RD. Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: optimal power settings. J Endourol. 1999;13(8):559–566.
    1. Wilson C, Kennedy JD, Irby P, Fried N. Miniature ureteroscope distal tip designs for potential use in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. J Biomed Opt. 2018;23(7):1–9.
    1. Keller EX, De Coninck V, Traxer O. Next generation fiberoptic and digital ureteroscopes. Urol Clin North Am. 2019
    1. Mues AC, Teichman JM, Knudsen BE. Quantification of holmium:yttrium aluminum garnet optical tip degradation. J Endourol. 2009;23(9):1425–1428.
    1. Wollin DA, Ackerman A, Yang C, Chen T, Simmons WN, Preminger GM, Lipkin ME. Variable pulse duration from a new Holmium:YAG laser: the effect on stone comminution, fiber tip degradation, and retropulsion in a dusting model. Urology. 2017;103:47–51.
    1. Hardy LA, Kennedy JD, Wilson CR, Irby PB, Fried NM. Analysis of thulium fiber laser induced bubble dynamics for ablation of kidney stones. J Biophotonics. 2017;10(10):1240–1249.
    1. Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Holmium:YAG (lambda = 2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda = 1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42(3):232–236.
    1. Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16(7):071403.
    1. Hardy LA, Wilson CR, Irby PB, Fried NM. Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy in an in vitro ureter model. J Biomed Opt. 2014;19(12):128001.
    1. Wilson CR, Hardy LA, Irby PB, Fried NM. Microscopic analysis of laser-induced proximal fiber tip damage during holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. Opt Eng. 2016
    1. Fried NM. Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: an in vitro analysis of stone fragmentation using a modulated 110-watt Thulium fiber laser at 1.94 microm. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37(1):53–58.
    1. Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy using tapered fibers. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42(1):45–50.
    1. Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Enhanced thulium fiber laser lithotripsy using micro-pulse train modulation. J Biomed Opt. 2012;17(2):028002.
    1. Hutchens TC, Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Detachable fiber optic tips for use in thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. J Biomed Opt. 2013
    1. Hutchens TC, Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM. Hollow steel tips for reducing distal fiber burn-back during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(7):078001.
    1. Hardy LA, Wilson CR, Irby PB, Fried NM. Rapid thulium fiber laser lithotripsy at pulse rates up to 500 Hz using a stone basket. IEEE J Sel Top Quant. 2014;20(5):138–141.
    1. Wilson CR, Hardy LA, Irby PB, Fried NM. Collateral damage to the ureter and Nitinol stone baskets during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. Lasers Surg Med. 2015;47(5):403–410.
    1. Wilson CR, Hardy LA, Kennedy JD, Irby PB, Fried NM. Miniature ball-tip optical fibers for use in thulium fiber laser ablation of kidney stones. J Biomed Opt. 2016;21(1):18003.
    1. Hutchens TC, Gonzalez DA, Irby PB, Fried NM. Fiber optic muzzle brake tip for reducing fiber burnback and stone retropulsion during thulium fiber laser lithotripsy. J Biomed Opt. 2017;22(1):18001.
    1. Gonzalez DA, Hardy LA, Hutchens TC, Irby P, Fried D. Thulium fiber laser-induced vapor bubble dynamics using bare, tapered, ball, hollow steel, and muzzle brake fiber optic tips. Opt Eng. 2018
    1. Isner JM, Lucas AR, Fields CD. Laser therapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Br J Hosp Med. 1988;40(3):172–178.
    1. Blackmon RL, Case JR, Trammell SR, Irby PB, Fried NM. Fiber-optic manipulation of urinary stone phantoms using holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(2):28001.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅