Pan-genome and comparative genome analyses of propionibacterium acnes reveal its genomic diversity in the healthy and diseased human skin microbiome

Shuta Tomida, Lin Nguyen, Bor-Han Chiu, Jared Liu, Erica Sodergren, George M Weinstock, Huiying Li, Shuta Tomida, Lin Nguyen, Bor-Han Chiu, Jared Liu, Erica Sodergren, George M Weinstock, Huiying Li

Abstract

Propionibacterium acnes constitutes a major part of the skin microbiome and contributes to human health. However, it has also been implicated as a pathogenic factor in several diseases, including acne, one of the most common skin diseases. Its pathogenic role, however, remains elusive. To better understand the genetic landscape and diversity of the organism and its role in human health and disease, we performed a comparative genome analysis of 82 P. acnes strains, 69 of which were sequenced by our group. This collection covers all known P. acnes lineages, including types IA, IB, II, and III. Our analysis demonstrated that although the P. acnes pan-genome is open, it is relatively small and expands slowly. The core regions, shared by all the sequenced genomes, accounted for 88% of the average genome. Comparative genome analysis showed that within each lineage, the strains isolated from the same individuals were more closely related than the ones isolated from different individuals, suggesting that clonal expansions occurred within each individual microbiome. We also identified the genetic elements specific to each lineage. Differences in harboring these elements may explain the phenotypic and functional differences of P. acnes in functioning as a commensal in healthy skin and as a pathogen in diseases. Our findings of the differences among P. acnes strains at the genome level underscore the importance of identifying the human microbiome variations at the strain level in understanding its association with diseases and provide insight into novel and personalized therapeutic approaches for P. acnes-related diseases.

Importance: Propionibacterium acnes is a major human skin bacterium. It plays an important role in maintaining skin health. However, it has also been hypothesized to be a pathogenic factor in several diseases, including acne, a common skin disease affecting 85% of teenagers. To understand whether different strains have different virulent properties and thus play different roles in health and diseases, we compared the genomes of 82 P. acnes strains, most of which were isolated from acne or healthy skin. We identified lineage-specific genetic elements that may explain the phenotypic and functional differences of P. acnes as a commensal in health and as a pathogen in diseases. By analyzing a large number of sequenced strains, we provided an improved understanding of the genetic landscape and diversity of the organism at the strain level and at the molecular level that can be further applied in the development of new and personalized therapies.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
P. acnes pan-genome. (A) A power law regression for new genes (n) discovered with the addition of new genome sequences (N). (B) A power law regression for total genes (n) accumulated with the addition of new genome sequences (N). Circles are the medians of n for 200 simulations. Error bars indicate the standard deviations for the 200 simulations.
FIG 2
FIG 2
A phylogenetic tree of 82 P. acnes strains and the distance matrix among the strains. A phylogenetic tree of 82 P. acnes strains was constructed based on the 123,223 SNPs in the core regions (2.20 Mb). The distances between strains were calculated as nucleotide substitution rates at all SNP sites, colored according to the scale bar. The strains from the same individuals (SSIs) belonging to the same lineages are marked with “+.”
FIG 3
FIG 3
SNP distribution in the core regions. (A) SNP frequencies (percentages of polymorphic sites) of the genes in the core regions. (B) K-S statistics for genes that had higher SNP frequencies with more than two standard deviations (SD). (C) Nonsynonymous mutation frequencies of the genes in the core regions. (D) K-S statistics for genes that had higher nonsynonymous mutation frequencies with more than 2 standard deviations.
FIG 4
FIG 4
P. acnes strains within each lineage share unique noncore genomic regions. Rows represent 82 P. acnes genomes, and columns represent 314 noncore regions that are longer than 500 bp. The genomes and the noncore regions were clustered based on similarity. The width of each block plotted is not proportional to the genomic length of each noncore region. The presence of a noncore region is colored in yellow, and the absence is colored in blue. The color schemes used for RT and clades are the same as in Fig. 2.

References

    1. Grice EA, Segre JA. 2011. The skin microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9:244–253
    1. White GM. 1998. Recent findings in the epidemiologic evidence, classification, and subtypes of acne vulgaris. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 39:S34–S37
    1. Li H. 2010. Metagenomic study of the human skin microbiome associated with acne. Nat. Precedings
    1. Fitz-Gibbon S, Tomida S, Chiu BH, Nguyen L, Du C, Liu M, Elashoff D, Erfe MC, Loncaric A, Kim J, Modlin RL, Miller JF, Sodergren E, Craft N, Weinstock GM, Li H. 2013. Propionibacterium acnes strain populations in the human skin microbiome associated with acne. J. Invest. Dermatol.
    1. Chambers HF, Deleo FR. 2009. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:629–641
    1. Chase-Topping M, Gally D, Low C, Matthews L, Woolhouse M. 2008. Super-shedding and the link between human infection and livestock carriage of Escherichia coli O157. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6:904–912
    1. Johnson JL, Cummins CS. 1972. Cell wall composition and deoxyribonucleic acid similarities among the anaerobic coryneforms, classical propionibacteria, and strains of Arachnia propionica. J. Bacteriol. 109:1047–1066
    1. McDowell A, Valanne S, Ramage G, Tunney MM, Glenn JV, McLorinan GC, Bhatia A, Maisonneuve JF, Lodes M, Persing DH, Patrick S. 2005. Propionibacterium acnes types I and II represent phylogenetically distinct groups. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:326–334
    1. Valanne S, McDowell A, Ramage G, Tunney MM, Einarsson GG, O’Hagan S, Wisdom GB, Fairley D, Bhatia A, Maisonneuve JF, Lodes M, Persing DH, Patrick S. 2005. CAMP factor homologues in Propionibacterium acnes: a new protein family differentially expressed by types I and II. Microbiology 151:1369–1379
    1. McDowell A, Perry AL, Lambert PA, Patrick S. 2008. A new phylogenetic group of Propionibacterium acnes. J. Med. Microbiol. 57:218–224
    1. Lomholt HB, Kilian M. 2010. Population genetic analysis of Propionibacterium acnes identifies a subpopulation and epidemic clones associated with acne. PLoS One 5:e12277
    1. McDowell A, Gao A, Barnard E, Fink C, Murray PI, Dowson CG, Nagy I, Lambert PA, Patrick S. 2011. A novel multilocus sequence typing scheme for the opportunistic pathogen Propionibacterium acnes and characterization of type I cell surface-associated antigens. Microbiology 157:1990–2003
    1. McDowell A, Barnard E, Nagy I, Gao A, Tomida S, Li H, Eady A, Cove J, Nord CE, Patrick S. 2012. An expanded multilocus sequence typing scheme for Propionibacterium acnes: investigation of “pathogenic," “commensal” and antibiotic resistant strains. PLoS One 7:e41480
    1. Brüggemann H, Henne A, Hoster F, Liesegang H, Wiezer A, Strittmatter A, Hujer S, Dürre P, Gottschalk G. 2004. The complete genome sequence of Propionibacterium acnes, a commensal of human skin. Science 305:671–673
    1. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium 2012. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486:215–221
    1. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium 2012. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486:207–214
    1. Human Microbiome Jumpstart Reference Strains Consortium. Nelson KE, Weinstock GM, Highlander SK, Worley KC, Creasy HH, Wortman JR, Rusch DB, Mitreva M, Sodergren E, Chinwalla AT, Feldgarden M, Gevers D, Haas BJ, Madupu R, Ward DV, Birren BW, Gibbs RA, Methe B, Petrosino JF, Strausberg RL, Sutton GG, White OR, Wilson RK, Durkin S, Giglio MG, Gujja S, Howarth C, Kodira CD, Kyrpides N, Mehta T, Muzny DM, Pearson M, Pepin K, Pati A, Qin X, Yandava C, Zeng Q, Zhang L, Berlin AM, Chen L, Hepburn TA, Johnson J, McCorrison J, Miller J, Minx P, Nusbaum C, Russ C, Sykes SM, Tomlinson CM, Young S, Warren WC, Badger J, Crabtree J, Markowitz VM, Orvis J, Cree A, Ferriera S, Fulton LL, Fulton RS, Gillis M, Hemphill LD, Joshi V, Kovar C, Torralba M, Wetterstrand KA, Abouellleil A, Wollam AM, Buhay CJ, Ding Y, Dugan S, FitzGerald MG, Holder M, Hostetler J, Clifton SW, Allen-Vercoe E, Earl AM, Farmer CN, Liolios K, Surette MG, Xu Q, Pohl C, Wilczek-Boney K, Zhu D, Zhu D. 2010. A catalog of reference genomes from the human microbiome. Science 328:994–999
    1. Brzuszkiewicz E, Weiner J, Wollherr A, Thürmer A, Hüpeden J, Lomholt HB, Kilian M, Gottschalk G, Daniel R, Mollenkopf HJ, Meyer TF, Brüggemann H. 2011. Comparative genomics and transcriptomics of Propionibacterium acnes. PLoS One 6:e21581
    1. Hunyadkürti J, Feltóti Z, Horváth B, Nagymihály M, Vörös A, McDowell A, Patrick S, Urbán E, Nagy I. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Propionibacterium acnes type IB strain 6609. J. Bacteriol. 193:4561–4562
    1. Horváth B, Hunyadkürti J, Vörös A, Fekete C, Urbán E, Kemény L, Nagy I. 2012. Genome sequence of Propionibacterium acnes type II strain ATCC 11828. J. Bacteriol. 194:202–203
    1. Vörös A, Horváth B, Hunyadkürti J, McDowell A, Barnard E, Patrick S, Nagy I. 2012. Complete genome sequences of three Propionibacterium acnes isolates from the type IA(2) cluster. J. Bacteriol. 194:1621–1622
    1. McDowell A, Hunyadkürti J, Horváth B, Vörös A, Barnard E, Patrick S, Nagy I. 2012. Draft genome sequence of an antibiotic-resistant Propionibacterium acnes strain, PRP-38, from the novel type IC cluster. J. Bacteriol. 194:3260–3261
    1. Niazi SA, Clarke D, Do T, Gilbert SC, Mannocci F, Beighton D. 2010. Propionibacterium acnes and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from refractory endodontic lesions are opportunistic pathogens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3859–3869
    1. Tettelin H, Riley D, Cattuto C, Medini D. 2008. Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11:472–477
    1. Schloissnig S, Arumugam M, Sunagawa S, Mitreva M, Tap J, Zhu A, Waller A, Mende DR, Kultima JR, Martin J, Kota K, Sunyaev SR, Weinstock GM, Bork P. 2013. Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome. Nature 493:45–50
    1. Ross JI, Snelling AM, Carnegie E, Coates P, Cunliffe WJ, Bettoli V, Tosti G, Katsambas A, Del Galvan P, Pulgar JI, Rollman O, Torok L, Eady EA, Cove JH. 2003. Antibiotic-resistant acne: lessons from Europe. Br. J. Dermatol. 148:467–478
    1. Jackson AP, Thomas GH, Parkhill J, Thomson NR. 2009. Evolutionary diversification of an ancient gene family (rhs) through C-terminal displacement. BMC Genomics 10:584.
    1. Horvath P, Barrangou R. 2010. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327:167–170
    1. Harris SR, Feil EJ, Holden MT, Quail MA, Nickerson EK, Chantratita N, Gardete S, Tavares A, Day N, Lindsay JA, Edgeworth JD, de Lencastre H, Parkhill J, Peacock SJ, Bentley SD. 2010. Evolution of MRSA during hospital transmission and intercontinental spread. Science 327:469–474
    1. Croucher NJ, Harris SR, Fraser C, Quail MA, Burton J, van der Linden M, McGee L, von Gottberg A, Song JH, Ko KS, Pichon B, Baker S, Parry CM, Lambertsen LM, Shahinas D, Pillai DR, Mitchell TJ, Dougan G, Tomasz A, Klugman KP, Parkhill J, Hanage WP, Bentley SD. 2011. Rapid pneumococcal evolution in response to clinical interventions. Science 331:430–434
    1. Chin CS, Sorenson J, Harris JB, Robins WP, Charles RC, Jean-Charles RR, Bullard J, Webster DR, Kasarskis A, Peluso P, Paxinos EE, Yamaichi Y, Calderwood SB, Mekalanos JJ, Schadt EE, Waldor MK. 2011. The origin of the Haitian cholera outbreak strain. N Engl J. Med. 364:33–42
    1. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8:195–202
    1. Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18:821–829
    1. Borodovsky M, McIninch J. 1993. Recognition of genes in DNA sequence with ambiguities. Biosystems 30:161–171
    1. Salzberg SL, Delcher AL, Kasif S, White O. 1998. Microbial gene identification using interpolated Markov models. Nucleic Acids Res. 26:544–548
    1. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12.
    1. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28:2731–2739
    1. Grissa I, Vergnaud G, Pourcel C. 2007. CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:W52–W57
    1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410
    1. de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. 2004. Open source clustering software. Bioinformatics 20:1453–1454
    1. Saldanha AJ. 2004. Java TreeView—extensible visualization of microarray data. Bioinformatics 20:3246–3248

Source: PubMed

3
订阅