Inhibition of mTOR signaling and clinical activity of metformin in oral premalignant lesions

J Silvio Gutkind, Alfredo A Molinolo, Xingyu Wu, Zhiyong Wang, Daniela Nachmanson, Olivier Harismendy, Ludmil B Alexandrov, Beverly R Wuertz, Frank G Ondrey, Denise Laronde, Leigha D Rock, Miriam Rosin, Charles Coffey, Valerie D Butler, Lisa Bengtson, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Julie E Bauman, Stephen M Hewitt, Ezra Ew Cohen, H-H Sherry Chow, Scott M Lippman, Eva Szabo, J Silvio Gutkind, Alfredo A Molinolo, Xingyu Wu, Zhiyong Wang, Daniela Nachmanson, Olivier Harismendy, Ludmil B Alexandrov, Beverly R Wuertz, Frank G Ondrey, Denise Laronde, Leigha D Rock, Miriam Rosin, Charles Coffey, Valerie D Butler, Lisa Bengtson, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Julie E Bauman, Stephen M Hewitt, Ezra Ew Cohen, H-H Sherry Chow, Scott M Lippman, Eva Szabo

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe aberrant activation of the PI3K/mTOR signaling circuitry is one of the most frequently dysregulated signaling events in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Here, we conducted a single-arm, open-label phase IIa clinical trial in individuals with oral premalignant lesions (OPLs) to explore the potential of metformin to target PI3K/mTOR signaling for HNSCC prevention.METHODSIndividuals with OPLs, but who were otherwise healthy and without diabetes, underwent pretreatment and posttreatment clinical exam and biopsy. Participants received metformin for 12 weeks (week 1, 500 mg; week 2, 1000 mg; weeks 3-12, 2000 mg daily). Pretreatment and posttreatment biopsies, saliva, and blood were obtained for biomarker analysis, including IHC assessment of mTOR signaling and exome sequencing.RESULTSTwenty-three participants were evaluable for response. The clinical response rate (defined as a ≥50% reduction in lesion size) was 17%. Although lower than the proposed threshold for favorable clinical response, the histological response rate (improvement in histological grade) was 60%, including 17% complete responses and 43% partial responses. Logistic regression analysis revealed that when compared with never smokers, current and former smokers had statistically significantly increased histological responses (P = 0.016). Remarkably, a significant correlation existed between decreased mTOR activity (pS6 IHC staining) in the basal epithelial layers of OPLs and the histological (P = 0.04) and clinical (P = 0.01) responses.CONCLUSIONTo our knowledge this is the first phase II trial of metformin in individuals with OPLs, providing evidence that metformin administration results in encouraging histological responses and mTOR pathway modulation, thus supporting its further investigation as a chemopreventive agent.TRIAL REGISTRATIONNCT02581137FUNDINGNIH contract HHSN261201200031I, grants R01DE026644 and R01DE026870.

Keywords: Clinical Trials; Head and neck cancer; Signal transduction.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1. CONSORT diagram.
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram.
The study (M4OC Prevent) was a phase IIa single-arm, open-label trial of individuals with oral leukoplakia or erythroplakia to explore the potential of metformin for oral cancer prevention (NCT02581137). The primary endpoint was to determine whether 12–14 weeks of metformin intervention is associated with the clinical response of OPLs. The secondary endpoints included histologic response to metformin in the target lesion, pretreatment and posttreatment tissue-based biomarkers of molecular targets and dysregulated molecular mechanisms, modulation of circulating metabolic biomarkers, and serum and saliva metformin concentrations. A brief summary of the trial workflow, schedule of baseline evaluation, intervention, and postintervention evaluation, and agent used (metformin) is depicted.
Figure 2. Biomarker analysis.
Figure 2. Biomarker analysis.
Examples of lesions positive and negative for p53 are shown in the 2 boxes of the first column. In the positive lesions, the expression is limited to the nuclei of the dysplastic proliferating cells. Examples of high and low EGFR expression levels are depicted (second column). All lesions tested negative for p16 and expressed OCT3 throughout the epithelial layers (third column). Examples of positive and negative PTEN lesions are depicted (fourth column). Please see the corresponding data for each individual participant in Table 2.
Figure 3. Metformin concentration in blood and…
Figure 3. Metformin concentration in blood and saliva and serum biomarkers.
Correlation analysis of metformin levels in serum and saliva in individuals treated with metformin.
Figure 4. Clinical and histological response to…
Figure 4. Clinical and histological response to metformin.
(A) A waterfall plot of the clinical response to treatment is shown, depicting the percentage of change in lesion size. Histological responses are also indicated based on the column color. The individual participant responses as well as the smoking status are depicted following the same numbering as in Figure 1. (B) Summary of the clinical and histological responses of all participants evaluated. (C) Statistical analysis of the histological response in relationship to the smoking status (*P = 0.016, Fisher’s exact test). CR, complete response; PR, partial response; NC, no change; PD, progressive disease.
Figure 5. Impact of metformin on proliferation…
Figure 5. Impact of metformin on proliferation and mTOR pathway signaling in oral premalignant lesions.
(A and B) Quantification of the IHC of the proliferation marker KI67 (A) and pS6 (surrogate indicator of the mTOR pathway activity) (B) was evaluated and reported as the percentage of positive cells for Ki67 and H score for pS6 before and after metformin treatment. Statistical significance (nonparametric Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-rank test) is indicated, and examples of staining before and after treatment are included in each case, with a higher magnification on the right. Notice the absence of pS6 staining in the basal layer of the oral premalignant lesion after metformin treatment. (C) Statistical analysis of the histological (left) and clinical (right) response in relationship to the changes in basal pS6 levels. Statistical significance is indicated (ordinal logistic regression). CR, complete response; PR, partial response; NC, no change; PD, progressive disease.

References

    1. Siegel RL, et al. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.
    1. Pulte D, Brenner H. Changes in survival in head and neck cancers in the late 20th and early 21st century: a period analysis. Oncologist. 2010;15(9):994–1001. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0289.
    1. Slaughter DP, et al. Field cancerization in oral stratified squamous epithelium; clinical implications of multicentric origin. Cancer. 1953;6(5):963–968. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195309)6:5<963::AID-CNCR2820060515>;2-Q.
    1. Hong WK, et al. 13-cis-retinoic acid in the treatment of oral leukoplakia. N Engl J Med. 1986;315(24):1501–1505. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612113152401.
    1. Papadimitrakopoulou VA, et al. Randomized trial of 13-cis retinoic acid compared with retinyl palmitate with or without beta-carotene in oral premalignancy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(4):599–604. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.1850.
    1. William WN, Jr , et al. Erlotinib and the risk of oral cancer: the erlotinib prevention of oral cancer (EPOC) randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(2):209–216. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4364.
    1. Bauman JE, Grandis J. Oral cancer chemoprevention-the end of EPOC, the beginning of an epoch of molecular selection. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(2):178–179. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.4637.
    1. Warnakulasuriya S, et al. Oral epithelial dysplasia classification systems: predictive value, utility, weaknesses and scope for improvement. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008;37(3):127–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00584.x.
    1. Iglesias-Bartolome R, et al. Exploiting the head and neck cancer oncogenome: widespread PI3K-mTOR pathway alterations and novel molecular targets. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):722–725. doi: 10.1158/-13-0239.
    1. Lui VWY, et al. Frequent mutation of the PI3K pathway in head and neck cancer defines predictive biomarkers. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):761–769. doi: 10.1158/-13-0103.
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Nature. 2015;517(7536):576–582. doi: 10.1038/nature14129.
    1. Molinolo AA, et al. Dissecting the Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling network: emerging results from the head and neck cancer tissue array initiative. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(17):4964–4973. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1041.
    1. Molinolo AA, et al. mTOR as a molecular target in HPV-associated oral and cervical squamous carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(9):2558–2568. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2824.
    1. Raimondi AR, et al. Rapamycin prevents early onset of tumorigenesis in an oral-specific K-ras and p53 two-hit carcinogenesis model. Cancer Res. 2009;69(10):4159–4166. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4645.
    1. Czerninski R, et al. Targeting mammalian target of rapamycin by rapamycin prevents tumor progression in an oral-specific chemical carcinogenesis model. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2009;2(1):27–36. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0147.
    1. Patel V, et al. Decreased lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis by mTOR inhibition in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71(22):7103–7112. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3192.
    1. Saito K, et al. Longitudinal imaging studies of tumor microenvironment in mice treated with the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049456.
    1. Squarize CH, et al. Chemoprevention and treatment of experimental Cowden’s disease by mTOR inhibition with rapamycin. Cancer Res. 2008;68(17):7066–7072. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0922.
    1. Sun Z-J, et al. Chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic actions of mTOR inhibitor in genetically defined head and neck squamous cell carcinoma mouse model. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(19):5304–5313. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1371.
    1. Day TA, et al. Inhibition of mTOR signaling and clinical activity of Rapamycin in head and neck cancer in a window of opportunity trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(4):1156–1164. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2024.
    1. Cohen EE, et al. Phase I studies of sirolimus alone or in combination with pharmacokinetic modulators in advanced cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(17):4785–4793. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0110.
    1. Viollet B, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: an overview. Clin Sci (Lond) 2012;122(6):253–270. doi: 10.1042/CS20110386.
    1. Pollak M. Metformin and other biguanides in oncology: advancing the research agenda. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2010;3(9):1060–1065. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0175.
    1. Quinn BJ, et al. Repositioning metformin for cancer prevention and treatment. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2013;24(9):469–480. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2013.05.004.
    1. Pollak MN. Investigating metformin for cancer prevention and treatment: the end of the beginning. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(9):778–790. doi: 10.1158/-12-0263.
    1. Pierotti MA, et al. Targeting metabolism for cancer treatment and prevention: metformin, an old drug with multi-faceted effects. Oncogene. 2013;32(12):1475–1487. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.181.
    1. Vitale-Cross L, et al. Metformin prevents the development of oral squamous cell carcinomas from carcinogen-induced premalignant lesions. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2012;5(4):562–573. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0502.
    1. Madera D, et al. Prevention of tumor growth driven by PIK3CA and HPV oncogenes by targeting mTOR signaling with metformin in oral squamous carcinomas expressing OCT3. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2015;8(3):197–207. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-0348.
    1. Wang Z, et al. Syngeneic animal models of tobacco-associated oral cancer reveal the activity of in situ anti-CTLA-4. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5546. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13471-0.
    1. Tseng CH. Metformin may reduce oral cancer risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. Oncotarget. 2016;7(2):2000–2008. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6626.
    1. Yen YC, et al. Effect of metformin on the incidence of head and neck cancer in diabetics. Head Neck. 2015;37(9):1268–1273. doi: 10.1002/hed.23743.
    1. Sandulache VC, et al. Association between metformin use and improved survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 2014;36(7):1039–1043. doi: 10.1002/hed.23409.
    1. Taylor D, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of p53 protein accumulation in head and neck cancer: correlation with p53 gene alterations. Hum Pathol. 1999;30(10):1221–1225. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(99)90041-2.
    1. Adelstein DJ, et al. Head and neck squamous cell cancer and the human papillomavirus: summary of a National Cancer Institute State of the Science Meeting, November 9–10, 2008, Washington, DC. Head Neck. 2009;31(11):1393–1422. doi: 10.1002/hed.21269.
    1. Izumi H, et al. Pathway-specific genome editing of PI3K/mTOR tumor suppressor genes reveals that PTEN loss contributes to cetuximab resistance in head and neck cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19(7):1562–1571. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-1036.
    1. Costello M, et al. Discovery and characterization of artifactual mutations in deep coverage targeted capture sequencing data due to oxidative DNA damage during sample preparation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(6):e67. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1443.
    1. Wood HM, et al. The genomic road to invasion-examining the similarities and differences in the genomes of associated oral pre-cancer and cancer samples. Genome Med. 2017;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0442-0.
    1. Lee JJ, et al. Predicting cancer development in oral leukoplakia: ten years of translational research. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(5):1702–1710.
    1. Reichart PA, Philipsen HP. Oral erythroplakia--a review. Oral Oncol. 2005;41(6):551–561. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2004.12.003.
    1. Arnaoutakis D, et al. Recurrence patterns and management of oral cavity premalignant lesions. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(8):814–817. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.04.008.
    1. Braakhuis BJ, et al. Expanding fields of genetically altered cells in head and neck squamous carcinogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15(2):113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2004.08.004.
    1. Pollak M. The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(3):159–169. doi: 10.1038/nrc3215.
    1. Higurashi T, et al. Metformin for chemoprevention of metachronous colorectal adenoma or polyps in post-polypectomy patients without diabetes: a multicentre double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(4):475–483. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00565-3.
    1. Hashibe M, et al. Interaction between tobacco and alcohol use and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(2):541–550. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0347.
    1. Armstrong WB, et al. Bowman birk inhibitor concentrate and oral leukoplakia: a randomized phase IIb trial. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2013;6(5):410–418. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0004.
    1. Papadimitrakopoulou VA, et al. Pilot randomized phase II study of celecoxib in oral premalignant lesions. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(7):2095–2101. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4024.
    1. Lippman SM, et al. Comparison of low-dose isotretinoin with beta carotene to prevent oral carcinogenesis. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(1):15–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301073280103.
    1. Nguyen MM, et al. Bioactivity and prostate tissue distribution of metformin in a preprostatectomy prostate cancer cohort. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018;27(6):557–562. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000394.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅